Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[iceweller]

Before release full schematics of device i will recommend read this book, it is very important to know!

Thiaoouba ENG: http://www.failiem.lv/down.php?i=nmupmg&n=Thiaoouba_ENG.pdf
Thiaoouba RUS: http://www.failiem.lv/down.php?i=nedvgl&n=Thiaoouba_RUS.pdf

   Cosmo, any feedback on the "hidden" component under the flyback (SR)?

[MrPayback]

MrPayback
Quote,
NMR frequency of the barium ferrite

----------------------------------------
Can you say what this frequency is ? {about]

This seems to me to be a HUGE contribution you have shared here!

Thank you,

Chet

Thank you Chet. You are so pleasant and down to Earth, they should make you a moderator since you have the sanity and fairness  required to do the job.

The frequency is going to depend on several factors such as the magnets and the coils wrapped around them. The important factors are that the coils and ring magnets are in a resonant state. You need to heterodyne at least two frequencies to create that harmonic to create the effect and keep it stable and you need to extract those photons that fly off the ferrite core with the HV spark gap coil.

It is a circus that must be performed precisely in order to get the energy. So the answer is there is no easy answer other than you need to be able to tune the circuit using the method I have described in previous posts. The frequency is > 100 KHZ so a 555 is not going to get you there since you are too many octaves away from where you need to be. You can however see the effect beginning to pop up using a 555 and a small pulse transformer.

Perhaps I can put together a small schematic so people can see how the moment you tune to the frequency of the ferrite, the frequency changes but if you use another 555 to sweep the first 555, then you can hit that sweet spot and maintain it.

I have located the exact magnets that SR is using and will receive them in a few days. The power transformer located under the coil is going to be a bit more difficult to find but can be built from scratch if needed.

According to SR, the device works like the Sparky Sweet vacuum triode and you are exploiting the time of magnetic domain shift. He also "conditions the magnets" to fracture the domains according to some Russians that are working with him.

At a general level right now I can see the effect, can tune to and stay on the frequency and can get for more energy out than one would expect possible. I'll update you in the future when I have something simple to replicate. There are probably 1000 different ways to build this device.

[LtBolo]

Can you say what this frequency is ? {about]

NMRs are not fixed, but vary greatly based on the magnetic field strength the molecule is in. At very low field strength, NMR frequencies are very, very low (kHz)...but...the mechanical Q of the resonances is likewise low, and they don't ring well at all. The engineering problem is in raising the magnetic field strength to a level that will produce a good Q, while keeping the frequency low enough to be manageable. It is indeed a tricky thing to manage if your goal is to resonate at a specific frequency.

That said, I don't really know what the benefit of hitting a material at its NMR is. When we were exploring the ferrite thing some months ago, I never could get results that were meaningful. I certainly could have been doing it wrong. Would be very nice if one of the guys that claim to have the answer...and have results to back the theory...would school the rest of us.

[MrPayback]

NMRs are not fixed, but vary greatly based on the magnetic field strength the molecule is in. At very low field strength, NMR frequencies are very, very low (kHz)...but...the mechanical Q of the resonances is likewise low, and they don't ring well at all. The engineering problem is in raising the magnetic field strength to a level that will produce a good Q, while keeping the frequency low enough to be manageable. It is indeed a tricky thing to manage if your goal is to resonate at a specific frequency.

That said, I don't really know what the benefit of hitting a material at its NMR is. When we were exploring the ferrite thing some months ago, I never could get results that were meaningful. I certainly could have been doing it wrong. Would be very nice if one of the guys that claim to have the answer...and have results to back the theory...would school the rest of us.

I spent a month experimentally figuring out what you just posted. Would be nice if you would post your experiments and results and school the rest of us.

Odd how you can hold just the right type and strength of magnet near a resonant coil and get much more output huh? Magnecoaster?

I must 50 different magnets and found two that worked at all and 1 that worked well to produce that effect. I think Utkin covered that in one of his free energy documents  - something about a bent or deformed magnetic field.

Notice how on the end of the Kapanadze and SR coils you have that end that sticks out but it does not have any coil over it?

[LtBolo]

I was experimenting on the theory that SR was using a spark discharge to vibrate the ferrite molecules, which lowered the permeability of the ferrite, thus increasing current per 0.5dLi^2. I was not so very interested in what frequency the ferrite was resonating, but that it simply was resonating, and while doing so permeability dropped.

After lots of time in the lab, I was never able to prove that permeability dropped, so I discontinued the line of experimentation. The sad thing was that it made so dang much sense as a theory. I will not blindly chase something however, and unless I have a very good reason to believe that a theory is true, I'll stop pretty quickly if I don't get experimental validation. I didn't.

The only thing I was able to prove conclusively is that ferrite saturates pretty quickly when sparked, but I'm pretty sure that wasn't news.