Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

Xeno, the man is correct. There is a short on this topology. You cannot have a PNP-NPN joined base transistor topology with the PNP's emiiter connected to possitive potential (+12v eg). This simple.

As far as the resistors initially shown in T-1000 topology is for reverse biasing transistors bases thus having firmer open-shut times (its a common darlighton transistor arrangement) but in this dual pair, i doubt if there is any gain.

Again, in initial T-1000 schematic, a pair of resistors is missing or the signal transistors will be blown out due to no current restriction flown from them to power transistor's bases.

Baroutologos, in that case i apologize to TheCell, the mistake is then on my side.
Thing is that it simulates without indication of a short, but everything that i have
not built myself like this case, i cannot know if it works outside of the simulator in particular in regards to gain.
The inverters that i usually build have the emitters of the first pair connected to the bases of the second pair which is pretty common.
Plus i had to assume that T-1000's schematic is valid, because his circuit does the job for him and he did not object to the new schematic.
So the question remains, how does the transistor driver in their circuit really look like?
Maybe gain is not useful here, because even if the driver voltage would only be 4.5 Volt RMS, the primary coil has a resistance of 0.1 milliOhm ...

[e2matrix]

@e2matrix
That second part is the voltage multiplier.  I would hang on to that, they are hard to find.
Most flybacks today have the multiplier built in to the same case, so you can't get it out.
You have the perfect flyback for this project, because that one should put out AC before the multiplier,
so you can connect the AV Plug directly to it.

AbbaRue,  Thanks for that info.  I had a feeling this would be a useful thing to keep and also thought that might be a voltage multiplier or final step up transformer.  Now if I can just figure out the pin out on the flyback I'll get a start on this. 

[energia9]

Cut out core, 1st wind is done.

[baroutologos]

Baroutologos, in that case i apologize to TheCell, the mistake is then on my side.
Thing is that it simulates without indication of a short, but everything that i have
not built myself like this case, i cannot know if it works outside of the simulator in particular in regards to gain.
The inverters that i usually build have the emitters of the first pair connected to the bases of the second pair which is pretty common.
Plus i had to assume that T-1000's schematic is valid, because his circuit does the job for him and he did not object to the new schematic.
So the question remains, how does the transistor driver in their circuit really look like?

I do not want to play it smart ass, just know it from experience. You can breadboard it easily and see.

We can have many combos so as to have a darlighton arrangement in driving the power transistors of this inverter
(even though it is a bit of a nice puzzle how this topology can be assembled to work so as eventually to have a pair of PNP and NPN signal transistors bases connected together.)

ps: Personally by far the most efficient, reliable and auto-resonance inverter is made by assembling a Royer osccilator setup. Works splendid but for replication shake do not deviate from original

[energia9]

Where is Wesley and T-1000?