Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 312 Guests are viewing this topic.

baroutologos

Hello @ all and especially verPie.

I was pondering in the already discussed issue of "wave riding" or ranchet effect.
this is can be very conventional if someone puts the oscope accross an inductor wound on ferrite core that it is subjected to two frequencies (voltage amplitudes can vary)

It may be very unconventional if the same oscillogram results from a probe coil (not connected to anything except scope) wound on the same core.
How this is explained by magnetic flux terms inside ferrite?

Flux oscillates back and forth? Domains oscillate in a "macro" way due to LF flux and in a micro way due to HF stimulus?


jbignes5

Quote from: TEKTRON on November 24, 2011, 11:45:12 PM
Forgive if I'm wrong but isn't 100ms pulses= 10Hz?
20ms pulses=50Hz,
16.7ms pulses=60Hz,
10ms pulses=100Hz.  ???


It doesn't matter what ms it is. Tesla says 2k hertz to be safe.

aidas

Wesley gave idea in airport about resonance support process control with help of magnetic dipole key on feedback and how I got solution. I managed to find practical solution for it after discussion with Tiger and we got to the point how it should look like in reality. The explanation of this process: Lets say we have constant electromagnetic field. We tune LC circuit for ferroresonance and match oscillation phase. As soon as spark gap fires, we need to interrupt it so it will support resonance and will not stop it. So it is feedback indicator for logical circuit what manages HV circuit. You can use this magnetic dipole switch in other circuits as well.
Hopefully it helps.

wattsup

@stivep

Hello Wesley and welcome back to our side of the pond.

I hope you had a good restful sleep. I really liked both the Lithuania OU 1 (LOU1) and Lithuania OU 2 (LOU2) videos.

Regarding the LOU1 video of the ferrite insertion and ascending waveform. I have done some also (without the ascending ave) and I put a photo of the ferrite I use below. This is four radio antenna ferrites on a stick that when you insert into the CC may provide much better or stronger response (plus easy on a stick no-shock insertion - lol). I think maybe better then what I am showing is if you make two of these with four shorter ferrites each and put from each end to adjust inter ferrite spacing and total combined positions. Each half would complement each bucking coil and CC half.

In the LOU2 video, I can see that the diode, vacuum capacitor and spark gap to the right of the bulb are not being used. This is very encouraging and I will try and get a closer look of the video to figure out the wiring. Hopefully my next flyback will arrive today before the weekend otherwise i will continue with the yoke experiments.

Thanks for your devotion and openness even at the face of some adversity.

wattsup

PS: In the image background is my all new "diode drum". Each of these will have a different response on any (low level) pulsing system. Labeling them makes changing easier or if an effect is really better then others, it may be worth specifying. Otherwise talking about diode models is a pain.