Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

Yes, this is a proven circuit that dives the primary of the flyback transformer with a distorted symmetrical sine wave by discharging the capacitor C1 into the primary according to parallel LC resonance principles.

Listen to Verpie, he knows what he is saying!
BTw, this is based upon the concept of Royer oscillator (works for mosfets and bipolars, in huge power levels as well as at signal level. all tested.) I have routinely used this configuration in my making of fluorescent tubes efficient inverters.

The major advantage over common flyback arrangement, (one transistor on off etc),  is it can function without outputing anything and not harming componets (whereas flyback especially at low frequency destroys someting when output is cut off). With the appropriate core it can handle serious power.
...

For my ringing experiments, i made a draft inverter and custom wound a ferox cube (this is tricky). I used also a voltage doubler arrangement. (cap and diodes) I can achieve some 4 KV. Mosfets i used are IRF630. Don;t be crazy about mosfets. Unless too small, anything with 10 A + current rating will run happily even with small heatsinks at 50w power rating or so. Voltage rating x 4 is good. (Typically, the inverter primary works each wave peaks at x2 ofthe inputed voltage. e.g 12v input = 24v peak wave, thus 50v p-p)

Tip: The inductor is essential component of the circuit and increases efficiently dramatically. So special care for the inductor should be given.  It should not saturate at the current levels used. Typically a 3A, 200uH is good for 50w rating.

Try and see.

ps: The frequency that the inverter will run based on the "super-imposed" LC circuit of the inverter. i explain. If the many turns secondary is not having anything connected (no a cap of HV little value) then the resonance frequency is estanblished by the few turns primary and primary capacitor. Hence L1 C1. If a HV cap (say 0.5nF 20KV) is added to the many turns secondary. then the frequency is defined by the L2C2 tank circuit, irrelevantly if you remove the C1 or change it.

Lastly, this circuit will work at high frequency even though no capacitance connected at L1 neither L2. Perhaps pure inductunce controls oscillation or just L2 stray capacitance, i am not sure.

[MeggerMan]

Yes, this is a proven circuit that dives the primary of the flyback transformer with a distorted symmetrical sine wave by discharging the capacitor C1 into the primary according to parallel LC resonance principles.
The flyback transformer's core must have an air gap, or it will not work with this circuit.  Flyback transformers have this air gap by design. It is usually covered by the HV secondary winding.

...
...

Another way would be to drive the two mosfet gates with a TL494 push-pull IC so that you can control the mark space ratio and hence the driving power to the primary winding.
The whole TL494 circuit does fit on a small vero board (I can post a pic of mine), but it would be a safe bet to heatsink the mosfets.
The mosfets section could go on a separate board, with small terminal blocks for the mosfet legs so you can swap out the mosfets when they blow.

Have we got the make up of the 2 devices?
Yoke device.
Cadeus wound tube device.

Meggerman

[verpies]

Yes the Flyback Transformer Driver that I had posted is based on the Royer oscillator.

Baroutologos comments contain practical useful info.
MeggerMan's idea of using the TL494 PWM IC is more complicated but it gives more control over frequency and duty cycle.  If you are not aiming for the simplest circuit, I strongly recommend it.

Actually the HV arc can be PW Modulated with an audio signal which will make an interesting speaker.  e.g. an mp3 player hooked up to the PWM input of the TL494 will make the music play through the arc.

Thousands have done it already as a cool science project. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2n3uikCkQg

[jbignes5]

hey Jbigs

Sounds like you know this stuff first hand.  ;]  Are you using rotary circuit controllers? Or just spark gaps?

Mags

I am trying to learn it. I love to read about this guy Tesla. He lived near me about 160 miles from me. The press release we had in here in NY state held big rumors and made me want to look it up when I was a kid. But I thought the schools were teaching me the right stuff. Turns out they were not.


As I got older I started to delve into his past and the patents he retained. I have read most of the stuff online including most of his books. Lectures is a very good read as well. I think his point of view was highly detailed in his notes and musings. He also wrote a lot in the trades literature.


I am gonna use the magnetic quenched spark gap. It's the only way to get clean enough bursts from a very big capacitor. Tesla also did a lot of research on spark gaps in vacuum tubes. Hmmm... Got to check that out myself.

This goes into it a bit more: http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-article-electric-discharge-in-vacuum-tubes?start=90

[Magluvin]

Hey J

How big of a cap are you thinking about?

You can get the same effect as a big cap using half cap and higher voltage. ;]

I have wondered if a vacuum tube rectifier in series with the spark gap would suffice to eliminate magnetic quenching.

Maybe you should start a new thread on these things, or a previously made thread.

Mags