Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Omnibus]

@sedang,

Like I said, Einstein's "theory" of relativity isn't a theory at all. It's nonsense and therefore has to be abandoned altogether, without a trace. Science has no use for any part of it. Also, it needs no replacement the way weed cleared from a wheat field needs no replacement.

[Omnibus]

@sedang,

So, if you get more than you introduce in a system, is an illusion, because that surplus comes from somewhere.

Not necessarily. There are instances where real energy doesn't come from a pre-existing energy reservoir but is due to force inducing spontaneous displacement as a result of  proper construction.

[ramset]

Omni said
Quote;
There are instances where real energy doesn't come from a pre-existing energy reservoir but is due to force inducing spontaneous displacement as a result of  proper construction.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPrGxB1Kzc

End of story!!

Now how do we do it??

Chet

[baroutologos]

Omni said and actually most people believe:

Nikola Tesla has aimed at obtaining maximum energy at the output of his device and that's what his resonance transformer, TT. happens to achieve -- the length of the input high-voltage coil of that transformer, HV, is one quarter of the resonant wavelength. In such a case at one end of its length, the left end, the voltage at maximum current will be 0V while at the other end there will be maximum voltage but minimum current.

This is the point most people do mistake. Voltage nodes and antinodes are created on a Tesla coil secondary (due to reflected waves) and the usual application of the 1/4 wavelength to coincide with top terminal means that the latter will be charged to a higher degree (than to be placed in another spot but top voltage) hence facilitating much amperage movement into the resonator. (coil)

From the above clear statement it is readily understood that ideally current DOES not formulates nodes and antinodes. If inter-coil capacitance does not exist then the current will be uniform across all the length of the inductor. In other words the current is not subjected to regions of little if any amperage and regions of heavy amperage, as voltage does.

That's a fact.

The reality is that the current is always heavier in the bottom of a Tesla coil rather than to the wire leading to top terminal capacity. This happens because much of it is "abosrbed" by the high charged wire of the resonator due to paracitic capacitance of the coil and that is a PAIN for good resonators.

Please instead of theorizing study the original Tesla work since those issues have been dealt by Tesla himself.

[Omnibus]

@baroutologos,

What I wrote earlier is an attempt to relate the content of the Russian text since most people here don't know that language. It by no means reflects my understanding of the matter, as you've mistakenly inferred. I think scientific proof that there are at all effects connected with OU in the so-called Tesla coil and other Tesla works regarding electricity is still wanting let alone a theory which would explain such purported effects. No offence, as far as I can tell almost all the studies regarding Tesla's claims in electricity have been carried out by amateurs and people who are not quite comfortable with the foundations of physics.