Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

Sorry to bother you but regarding the pulsing circuit, after lengthy trials to find it locally with no luck, I finally ordered the TPS2833 from DigiKey, the only place that had them. They are surface mount type so I found these small adapter circuit boards from Futurlec. I also ordered the HV caps plus some IRF7307 mosfet drivers to also try out the pulsing method used by a former member @otto.

The IRF7307 drivers are good for driving only one POWER MOSFET and 6V is not enough to fully open a large transistor like a Power HEXFET. 
For high power Half-bridge made out of two Power MOSFETs (like in the Royer circuit)  you would require a bipolar driver with "dead time" control and a charge pump for the gate of the high-side transistor. (the TPS2833 is one of many drivers that fit that bill).
The "dead time" is important because in H-Bridge configuration one transistor "pushes up" and a second transistor "pulls down" the voltage.  If both of them get open at the same time, they short-circuit and kill each other (immediately or slowly by overheating)

[Jimboot]

I'm hoping the more learned here can help explain something I observed tonight. Unfortunately I cant give you a lot of data as I have no scope scope shots nor current measurements. Whilst light my incandescent household lamp 240v 25wat bayonet cap, I had been fiddling with various aerial configs. I decided just for the hell of it to hook up what is essentially a closed loop av plug without a load to the primary where it is connected to the lamp. At the other end of the lamp was the standard aerial alligator clip.


The lamp glowed visibly brighter. I tried three diodes, brighter again, four diodes brighter still. Then my mje3055 blew. I don't know if I was drawing more current but it was odd to me that simply adding diodes to essentially the hot end of my coil the lamp grew brighter.


Was it picking up the energy From the coil and feeding it back into the lamp? The diodes were connected anode to cathode like an av plug, closed loop and no load. Thanks guys. I'm sure it is something you have already seen but it is doing my head in.

[itsu]

@ Wattsup,

has anyone tried putting an extra primary in series with the pancake coil as I had mentioned twice before. Experimentation is a process in which when trying one thing, the results or lack of result will lead you to other side tests. The test I am trying to ask to try is to see if there is  way to increase output by modifying how the pancake coil receives its pulses.

I went from a 7 turn pancake primary (L1) coil to presently a 2 turn L1 coil, and there is a stronger blue streamer on top of the kacher coil (L2), so it seems the L1/L2 coil ratio improvemed (3.5 times) paid off.

When putting this 7 turn pancake coil back and in series with the present 2 turn coil, this streamer  gets much weaker.

So it seems the less primary (L1) turns (or the greater the L1/L2 coil ratio) the better the HV RF.

However, with this 2 turn primary L1 coil, the output of the bulb is much weaker, so it seems you were right that the bulb seems to be lit by the induction between primary L1 coil and  the L3 coil and not by the kacher coil, or only minimal.

But as we need the kacher coil to start the oscillation, we can not do without it.

Regards Itsu

P.S.,  verpies, PM seen and replied.

[jbignes5]

@ Wattsup,

I went from a 7 turn pancake primary (L1) coil to presently a 2 turn L1 coil, and there is a stronger blue streamer on top of the kacher coil (L2), so it seems the L1/L2 coil ratio improvemed (3.5 times) paid off.

When putting this 7 turn pancake coil back and in series with the present 2 turn coil, this streamer  gets much weaker.

So it seems the less primary (L1) turns (or the greater the L1/L2 coil ratio) the better the HV RF.

However, with this 2 turn primary L1 coil, the output of the bulb is much weaker, so it seems you were right that the bulb seems to be lit by the induction between primary L1 coil and  the L3 coil and not by the kacher coil, or only minimal.

But as we need the kacher coil to start the oscillation, we can not do without it.

Regards Itsu

P.S.,  verpies, PM seen and replied.

Tesla was very clear that one turn was the best. Just remember that if one uses a bifilar as recommended it would equal 2 windings. Tesla never considered the flat coil on the bottom as the primary and I think this is where we are going wrong here. It's supposed to be the secondary and bifilar. I think we are pumping the coil the wrong way. We want to start a flow into the earth and couple to that via a heavy bifilar low turn coil. This would be a one way coupling and not effect the flow into the Earth. Think of it as creating a shortcut for lightning. There are tons of lightning strikes evey minute around our globe. I doubt what we need would even drop this rate to half at max.


Think about the field around the main tall coil and what I have shown you already. It would be operating in a screw like fashion because of the flow it creates in the center of the coil. If the flow is in the right direction the highest point would have a different type of brush. This is actually an in-rushing instead of a jetting out. If you then surround the tall coil with a bifilar wound heavy coil you can induce off of this flow and not reflect back to the flow.


I think most have misunderstood Tesla the whole time. He was creating a vacuum but it was of the magnetic lines in the local space. When the area or space if filled with electric field lines it pushes the magnetic field out of the area. Except for the channel(coil) you create in the middle of that space. You do realize we live on a huge magnet right?

[Hope]

Then, as you suggest, we also are using a Rodin coil backwards?  What would you suppose about changing the middle of the Rodin center field into an antenna pickup and the output off the coil?  Then where would the bifilar coil be located.

On the inside between the antenna and Rodin or at what is now considered the inputs of a normal Rodin configuration?

Or is the bifilar just not needed.

Will the antenna need to be a Cad coil balanced in the mid field of the Rodin and perhaps the bifilar used as a tuning buck-er?

Odd thoughts, but easy to see when this flow is imagined as a fluid.