Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Omnibus]

@sadang,

As I've said many times, careful examination of Einstein's "theory" of relativity reveals that it isn't a theory at all since it is based on internal contradictions which make it nothing more than sheer nonsense. Thus, any claims that there are experiments proving its validity are just manipulations of aggressive propaganda and have no merit in reality. Therefore, Einstein "theory" of relativity should never be even mentioned in the context of any scientific discussion. On the other hand, the absence of ether follows from the experiment of Michelson and Morley which is only connected to the said "theory" in terms of proving its second postulate wrong. Thus, absence of ether is proven beyond a doubt and Tesla's invoking ether in explaining the possible effects seen in his  proposals isn't plausible. Eventual production of excess energy in these device most likely follows from reasons common to all devices producing such, including the mechanical ones.

The main problem, however, still remains and it is not how these devices work, it is not the theory behind them but whether or not they really are OU devices. Mainstream science still doesn't recognize them as such and the followers of Tesla, such as Kapanadze, claiming they are, as well as others who claim they have successful OU devices, do nothing to overturn that understanding, unfortunately. As a rule these claimants, surrounded by all kinds of lawyers and advisors, expect reward prior to proving the reality of what they claim. It never works that way and we are at a stalemate at this point, most likely, in many instances, just held hostage of mere incompetence and misunderstanding aside from greed and hopes of dreamers. There is also legitimate research in the area of OU but the boundaries are blurred at this time.

[exnihiloest]

Thank you very much omnibus. Interesting ideas.

Anyway, seems that in the world of free energy everything rotate around the Tesla works. And if we count that he had opposed to Einstein theories, and he believed in the existence of ether (his kind of ether not the actual meanings of it), I believe we have to rethink the entire our world.

sadang

With Einstein theory we retrieve all Maxwell's electromagnetism. For example the magnetic field is an electric field viewed from a moving referential. The two theories are perfectly consistent and solid. In despite the recognition of the scientific community who took his name for unit of magnetic field, Tesla was a very brilliant inventor but not a brilliant physicist. By opposing to Maxwell's theory, he proved he had not a good vision of electromagnetism. Nevertheless (or for that reason) the tinkers in electricity who do not well understand these theories brought him back to a weird guru form, changed his patents into a esoteric matter with secrets and made him their god. I'm very sorry because it is an insult to this brilliant inventor. If Einstein's or Maxwell's theories are to be challenged, it is certainly not by Tesla's work.

[sadang]

@ Omnibus

   Not wanting to give birth to a controversy, because nobody uses. Teoria sine praxis est un rota sine axis!
   
   Maybe you're right or not in what you say. However, I disagree with the current theory of gravity and with Bohr's atomic model, and such default with almost all in the current science. Everything, I think is a false illusion, a science based on effects, not causes. And the error is old and well-founded, reasoned and maintained "scientific". When I say these things does not mean that I have other answers, or theories, or certainty to replace with. Simply, the current science does not thanks me, because it is superficial, full of contradictions and founded intentionally wrong. I try to have an all-encompassing vision, and as try as much I see the deeper differences that make up the whole. Now I stop here because the subject is leads to philosophy.

   Returning to overunity I want to say this word and its meaning should not exist, because something can not be analyzed only in a closed, isolated system, in which we wonder as we get more than we introduce (like in the case of Tapanadze, Steven Mark and other like them - from a battery can power a few light bulbs). But completely isolated systems exist only in theory and in the current science, in reality no such system could exist. Everything is interconnected and interdependent. So, if you get more than you introduce in a system, is an illusion, because that surplus comes from somewhere. The big question is how this occurs? The subject is very broad and I not even know English so well, nor have the time and knowledge needed to write complex explanations.

sadang

[forest]

The universe is electric. Tesla opposed Einstein theory because he was convinced that space and time are not existing things just a matter of measurement.So space and time cannot be bended.
I think he had a secret knowledge , probably antigravity device which allowed him to talk about his own theory, but afaik that theory was never published.

[Omnibus]

With Einstein theory we retrieve all Maxwell's electromagnetism. For example the magnetic field is an electric field viewed from a moving referential. The two theories are perfectly consistent and solid. In despite the recognition of the scientific community who took his name for unit of magnetic field, Tesla was a very brilliant inventor but not a brilliant physicist. By opposing to Maxwell's theory, he proved he had not a good vision of electromagnetism. Nevertheless (or for that reason) the tinkers in electricity who do not well understand these theories brought him back to a weird guru form, changed his patents into a esoteric matter with secrets and made him their god. I'm very sorry because it is an insult to this brilliant inventor. If Einstein's or Maxwell's theories are to be challenged, it is certainly not by Tesla's work.

The above is crap due to incompetence. Needs no reply.