Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[aether22]

Here is the photo, sadly by then it has stopped working.

While I don't know what went wrong I do know it wasn't the diode, cap, MOT or bulbs or at least if it is it is a partial or intermittent fault.

I suspect the problem live elsewhere, could I have killed my autotransformer so quickly maybe, or it is a wiring failure.

I'll do more tomorrow, but lighting 1.2KW of bulbs sounds pretty good to me for a first one shot test.  This thing IS replicateable!

Come on in, the water is fine!  Last one in's a rotten egg!

Note: that funny looking bit of metal is a modified piece of casing from a PSU that had been used in a previous build and had variable resistors put in it, it was being used to shield the house from the spark gap.

[aether22]

Interesting thing Naudin begun to  things.

By the way, you are conviced of OU going on there. Is it? Are you sure for that? 90% efficiencies are quite misleading according my experience.

Has Naudin claimed OU yet?

EDIT: Replicator has posted a very good suggestion for an initial overview regarding the OU matter

Not sure if you mean me, but yes, I'm quite sure.

Here is how you can prove it yourself, Naudin had 2100W bulbs lit from 205 watts in, now in reality there must with this circuit being so basic and a hot spark gap be, radiating EMF, resistance through the ground EASILY 10% of the input power would be wasted so that would be a max of 184W that could under rather improbably ideal circumstances power the bulbs.

The bulbs are reasonably well lit but not super bright but if we were to assume full power 2100W / 184W = 11.4 times OU!
For it to be unity the bulbs would need to be lit to only less that one eleventh of their full power.

So why don't you do the following for us, take a 150W halogen bulb and light it with 13W and take it outside and have grass in the background, let's see how bright it is!

Unless I am terribly mistaken you are going to get at best a dim red filament glow, so go ahead assume his power input measurements were half or wait, try a quarter of what he was really putting in so now give it 52W, does it look as bright as as JLN's bulbs?  I doubt it.

If you are a diehard skeptic or MIB you won't be convinced, and if you are looking for absolute certainty you may not be fully convinced.
But there is enough reason to be  SURE that there is relatively easy reproducible OU result with this setup, so don't criticize, BUILD IT if you care about being constructive and improve the measurement procedure.

And of course it is reasonably similar to Kapanadze's device and that can be looped so we know that OU results are possible with similar setups.

This is as much certainty as you will find in experimental OU, if it's not enough to get you building you are in the wrong place!

[romerouk]

@aether22
good point, even if we don't have OU in the setup we can easily see that we have an unusual result, at least mathematical. In my case I had betwen 1.16 - 1.7 amps @240v. Easy to see that the bulbs are lit at least around 50%. I call it many times 'extra energy' so nobody is upset. Looping is not easy even if we have 100% guarantee that we produce more than we put in, there are few tricks to do, the balance betwen the input frequency and the output  frequency  is not easy to maintain.

@baroutologos
please do some real testing yourself, theory is not always confirmed by the reality.

[broli]

@aether22
good point, even if we don't have OU in the setup we can easily see that we have an unusual result, at least mathematical. In my case I had betwen 1.16 - 1.7 amps @240v. Easy to see that the bulbs are lit at least around 50%. I call it many times 'extra energy' so nobody is upset. Looping is not easy even if we have 100% guarantee that we produce more than we put in, there are few tricks to do, the balance betwen the input frecvency and the output  frequency  is not easy to maintain.

I hope I will not get a "go do it yourself" answer. Woopy has already built and adjustable spark gap and I'm very curious on how it effects the input and output while adjusting this or even quenching it with a magnet. The next big parameter is the core of the main coil. If one could aquire some stack of ferrite rings and then make it so that it can be pulled in and out easily, this would give a huge degree of experimental exploration during operation.

http://bit.ly/aD8Fhs

[replicator]

Let me observe that the light bulb's characteristic are very very nonlinear, moreover the human eyes's sensitive characteristic is also very nonlinear. It may means that between 1000lm nominal light flux and the 300lm flux you can say "It light near to full" and the other side to lit a bulb at it's 50% of nominal emission is not equal it eats 50% of input power. But in fact, without using precise watt measuring mounting you will get false results.