Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

Question:
Why most of (if not- all) of the knowledge in the area of free energy analysis comes not from USA but from Russia and Eastern Europe? (or people originating from that region- including Tesla)Can anyone explain that?

I don't think it does. Stephen Mark, Don Smith, T Henry Moray, EV Gray were all from the US.

That said, I do agree that regarding Tesla style technologies, Russia and and the old Soviet bloc probably have a better understanding. I would suggest that there has been a more aggressive effort in the US to alter what is taught in schools and probably a more aggressive effort at suppression. The economic and manufacturing strength of the US makes it a far greater risk to the energy status quo.

I could flip that back on you, however, and ask that since you have a greater knowledge, why aren't there plans available to build a closed loop generator? It is very sad to see people like Kapanadze with a clear understanding on how to solve the world's energy problem, but is unable to get a product to market and apparently unwilling to share his knowledge. I represent a design and manufacturing company, as well as a very large marketing and distribution company, that could put a product like Kapanadze's generator all over the world very quickly. I would gladly invest significant resources into the development of such a product...if only I know how it worked.

[sparks]

  I believe that anything after the spark gap is immaterial to the energy collection system.  In reading works compiled by Tesla I remember quite clearly that when he was experimenting with vacuum tubes he was disappointed.  He could not duplicate with the vacuum tubes what he had achieved with a spark gap.  I believe that a gas when it changes phase into a plasma due to the conservation of inertia allows for the subatomic inertia of the electron to become manifest in the plasma construct.  Each electron in a hydrogen atom produces one milliamp of current.  When one thousand hydrogen electrons become "hot" or seperated from the inertial frame of the neucleus the resulting plasma current is the accumulation of the individual atoms currents.  One amp.  If a magnetic field is present then the plama current will be coherent with a predictable motion determined by the magnetic field lines permeating the plasma.  As the plasma growth can now be controlled by a magnetic field it can be stopped short of the electrode connected to the output circuit. 
This conveys by electrostatic induction a high state of charge in the collector electrode.  The plasma as a whole is neutral as far as charge but as the plasma current approaches the collector its charge density effectively shields the proton charge and the collector electrode becomes charged positively.  This is electrostatic induction and is no mystery.  Cold current flows from the plasma electron field to the positive collector or capacitor.  This energy is not supplied by the ionizing scource it is just conservation of inertia the inertia of the individual electrons becoming manifest in the inertia of the plasma current.  The plasma current does not go unrecognized by the space surrounding the plasma.  One amp of current is one amp of current through one turn  if the plasma is constructed in a flat plane.  The resulting torroidal magnetic field can also be tapped for electromagnetic induction.  These would proceed not unlike any other electrodynamic transformation.  On a turn to turn ratio and current flow though the primary.  It is reasonable to state that a mole of nitrogen atoms could be ionized in a spark gap of moderate size.  This would result in a plasma current of  6 times 10 to the 23 milliamps.  or 6 times 10 to the 2o amperes in the primary one turn loop.  This produces a sizeable magnetic field disruption that can be imposed on a secondary which will transform this current to very high voltage.  This again is just the inertia of the individual electrons in atomic orbitals conserved in a macroscopic circulation of electrons. 

[Dankie1]

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5756-my-smith-kanapadz-replication-17.html#post102396

Somebody go to this site and and plz get the original comments from SR , in russian , I will have them translated brute force by my russian buddy who I help with electronics . Better yet , does anybody have the original SR text .

It is simply not understandable in this way , better yet

[stivep]

I don't think it does. Stephen Mark, Don Smith, T Henry Moray, EV Gray were all from the US.

That said, I do agree that regarding Tesla style technologies, Russia and and the old Soviet bloc probably have a better understanding. I would suggest that there has been a more aggressive effort in the US to alter what is taught in schools and probably a more aggressive effort at suppression. The economic and manufacturing strength of the US makes it a far greater risk to the energy status quo.

I could flip that back on you, however, and ask that since you have a greater knowledge, why aren't there plans available to build a closed loop generator? It is very sad to see people like Kapanadze with a clear understanding on how to solve the world's energy problem, but is unable to get a product to market and apparently unwilling to share his knowledge. I represent a design and manufacturing company, as well as a very large marketing and distribution company, that could put a product like Kapanadze's generator all over the world very quickly. I would gladly invest significant resources into the development of such a product...if only I know how it worked.

Thank you very much for very well supported response

Stephen Mark,
Wikipedia:

Technology also known as . . .
The Toroid Generator.
The T.P.U . (Torroidal Power Unit)
"Ring of Power"
Questions
Where is it now? Has it been independently replicated? Is it being moved toward production somewhere?

Who was the buyer? Government? Or maybe no-one?
Did THAT COME FROM RUSSIA?
http://www.springerlink.com/content/p43076405k746578/ ( Russian Academy of Science was working on it since year 1947)

or

term Tokamak is a transliteration of the Russian word Токамак which itself is an acronym made from the Russian words: "Ñ,ороидальная камера в магниÑ,ныÑ... каÑ,ушкаÑ..." (toroidal'naya kamera v magnitnykh katushkakh) â€" toroidal chamber in magnetic coils (Tochamac)). It was invented in the 1950s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Soviet physicists Igor Yevgenyevich Tamm and Andrei Sakharov (who were in turn inspired by an original idea of Oleg Lavrentyev).

[/b]

Steven  claims his grandfather was an Admiral for
the Russian Navy.
http://www.angelfire.com/film/stevenmark0/

Was that stolen from Russia?
look below:

15. Typical mode of operation: (of Stephen Mark)
Finds investors, does demo, shows problem such as the device wonÕt work
when upside down or it over heats, all of which can be solved for an
additional million. When investors get impatient, Mark kills the deal
through stock manipulations, corporate politicking working the investors
against each other by lying to one about the other and so on. Eventually
the deal gets so screwed up the investors go away and Mark is looking
for another investor.
Regards
Raymond Dale
Perth Australia

This is  to be sucessful replication :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1589323258906115584#
Well is that convincing enough   compared to SR?

another factor:
Since this is not the Russian Block and replicator was in contact with  this forum How many of you have it at your table?
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2535.0.html

Was Kapanadze or SR ever using Other People Money and  accused of fraud?

So how many  of the people replicated :Wikipedia-

It's NOT dormant! Mr. Mark via Lindsay Mannix has helped to guide a group of willing experimenters in learning how his technology works. He has not been in contact for some time however. Mr. Mark became reclusive due to being slandered quite severely back in the 90's, and sold the rights to his device and withdrew from public demonstrations etc.

If you want me to say more  I will . But that is  enough so far isn't it, my friend?




Relativity of Greed:
(one country hero is another country terrorist- Nelson Mandela)
From that stand point I will say that I myself would love sell Free energy device as well as most of  the members of this forum BUT IDIOTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NONE, AND NEVER WILL ANY FREE ENERGY DEVICE EASY REPLICATED THAT WILL SALE. save your life and give it for free or be "no longer"
So do you think governments are just  waiting or  governments already have it?
Our Free Energy Movement Hero- is the one who does not have a chance to sale it and only can donate it to others.
Somebody  else terrorist is one, who take bread from hard working families by making them automaticaly unemployed.( Free Energy)

If Stephen or any other Kapanadze or maybe  just you  really have it and decide to publish it. Than "overnight" world  crisis is inevitable.  billions (of population) without the work.  No coper manufacturing, oil, electricians and poles/wires, no stack market,  no money to pay and no money to borrow.
That is the first picture of Free Energy.



Wesley

[LtBolo]

@Wesley

I'm not sure what you are trying to prove. If you want to try to build a case why everything is from Russia, go ahead, it really makes no difference to me. I don't think that Stephen Mark got his technology from Russia, although I do believe he got much of it from other people. In the end it is irrelevant, the technology was bought and buried.

The question is what are we going to do about it?

It is possible to sell a free energy technology. Two things must happen: 1) The technology must released into the public domain, and 2) corporate interests who have the financial incentive to build viable products must do so. Only when both conditions are met will the technology stay freely available, and in a form that can benefit the largest number of people. Sadly, as long as people continue to attempt patents and protections, those that would bury it will be able to continue to do so. If just one person that has demonstrated true closed loop free energy would release that information...just one...the genie would be out of the bottle and impossible to put back in.

As for the impact to the world...I disagree...I don't think it would be as bad as you think. Although the changes would be significant, it would not happen overnight...it couldn't...it isn't economically possible. The average person on the street has no hope of building something that could power their house. Anything like that would have to be purchased. Economically speaking, it would take decades for power generation equipment to be built and replace existing infrastructure. It would be the largest single change since the automobile, but it would all eventually settle down.

Again, since you Russia and eastern European types seem to have a good understanding of this, please enlighten your western  brothers. Has SR published schematics? Has Kapanadze published schematics?