Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[cosmoLV]

Ok... what kind of help are you willing to offer? How extensive your "authorization" goes?

all what i can say, i already told, if somebody not happy with this, then what can i do?
in Russian forums many are replicated this - not so many, but 3 peoples are successful results, I'm not guilty if in English speaking forums peoples not want to work and think

from me, no schematics and no photos and videos, this is my principle - believe or not (each choice)

[baroutologos]

I am not quite following you..
What you have said and what principle you have demonstrated and worked for few?

[forest]

" To create such a "sink," or "cold hole," as we might say, in the medium, would be equivalent to producing in the lake a space either empty or filled with something much lighter than water.  This we could do by placing in the lake a tank, and pumping all the water out of the latter.  We know, then, that the water, if allowed to flow back into the tank, would, theoretically, be able to perform exactly the same amount of work which was used in pumping it out, but not a bit more.  Consequently nothing could be gained in this double operation of first raising the water and then letting it fall down.  This would mean that it is impossible to create such a sink in the medium.  But let us reflect a moment.  Heat, though following certain general laws of mechanics, like a fluid, is not such; it is energy which may be converted into other forms of energy as it passes from a high to a low level.  To make our mechanical analogy complete and true, we must, therefore, assume that the water, in its passage into the tank, is converted into something else, which may be taken out of it without using any, or by using very little, power.  For example, if heat be represented in this analogue by the water of the lake, the oxygen and hydrogen composing the water may illustrate other forms of energy into which the heat is transformed in passing from hot to cold.  If the process of heat transformation were absolutely perfect, no heat at all would arrive at the low level, since all of it would be converted into other forms of energy.  Corresponding to this ideal case, all the water flowing into the tank would be decomposed into oxygen and hydrogen before reaching the bottom, and the result would be that water would continually flow in, and yet the tank would remain entirely empty, the gases formed escaping.  We would thus produce, by expending initially a certain amount of work to create a sink for the heat or, respectively, the water to flow in, a condition enabling us to get any amount of energy without further effort.  This would be an ideal way of obtaining motive power.  We do not know of any such absolutely perfect process of heat-conversion, and consequently some heat will generally reach the low level, which means to say, in our mechanical analogue, that some water will arrive at the bottom of the tank, and a gradual and slow filling of the latter will take place, necessitating continuous pumping out.  But evidently there will be less to pump out than flows in, or, in other words, less energy will be needed to maintain the initial condition than is developed by the fall, and this is to say that some energy will be gained from the medium.  What is not converted in flowing down can just be raised up with its own energy, and what is converted is clear gain. Thus the virtue of the principle I have discovered resides wholly in the conversion of the energy on the downward flow."


Nikola Tesla http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1900-06-00.htm

[ramset]

I like when we get back to "fluid"analogies!
The aether as a fluid !
It is after all the best documented way to show OU.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPrGxB1Kzc

Like smashing rocks to light a fire,

@Wesley I'm quite sure the first guy that did that [smashing rocks..] ,those that were witness ,wrote  horror stories also!
We go on to survive these little moments...
It is our destiny!

And we don't have to "Smash" to light fires anymore,
and I'm quite sure there are other ways to work the aether,
as Tesla and others have Stated.

Chet

[core]

my choice is to think based on the facts i have on hand.

  If it's not too much trouble would you mind sharing these 'facts' that you have on hand? I will take everyone's idea's and theory's seriously I have no interest arguing and belittling anyone. So please share as much as you feel comfortable with.

  @Cosmo no need to apologize for anything you have said. Words are the worst form of communication, they do not always convey the thought well. Also interesting point about that picture. That 'dark orange' cylinder in is a 'Refrigerant' tank. That is R-404a. I am not stating that he is using R-404a but find it an odd parallel based on my last post.

Good luck to all.

Respectfully,

Core