Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

you use wrong wires, see my image. wires need to bee with isolation, this is great for spacing.
you need usual electric wire - not magnet wire. on first layer of coil are something about 40 turns

i like your attitude. You say its the wire responsible for. I do not remember for sure, but i think i have done it with audio speak wire, much like the electric one... anyway i am reluctant to say that for sure.

Question: Why the few turns, thick walled wires are suitable, is the spacing or the dielectric they provide?? Any other reason you suspect?


ps: my ferrites http://cgi.ebay.com/Large-Ring-Ferrite-Cores-38x24x7mm-Lot-8-/190441924205?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2c5739266d#ht_1612wt_964

[stivep]

You have TC transmitter in Moscow and you have TC reciever in Banglasesh When you put light bulb load to TC reciever 1000km away , you claim that TC transmitter will FEEL it like load ?
It was kind of a joke above... but jets talk about TC reciever and transmitter at closer distances

In  reality energy send equals energy received after the loses. without energy send there is no energy received. That state  above fact that receiver is feed by transmitter.
In previous experiments with radio there was no power supply to receiver.
Therefore it is possible to create energy transfer using scalar waves.Scalar  Wave represents independently powered "repeaters-cells" able to transfer energy at no loss level as that energy is independent from the carrier (repeater-cell).
The recovery of energy utilized by "repeater-cell" take place at "it's own expense" similar to  magnet field recovery
<sup>(vertical repealing magnets in glass tube,one is pushed by  vector down e.g hand or force-recovers)
Than if there is dependency established between transmitter and receiver in the way that now we have transceivers from the both sides. That structure becomes permanent coupler in which energy from one is used to feed energy of the second and reverse.
There is no longer deal with losses that could be utilized same way as by Kapanadze or SR.
Part of energy received could be used to sustain motion of transmitter.
Such coupling is realized by the means of backward communication fallowing previously received energy.

So now the Russian friend is RIGHT and there is not so polite to laugh from that
Everything is relative
Wesley</sup>

[grizli]

i say already why i`m not showing my works!
That's it, believe or not - your problem.

They who want to make it, they make.
yes i talked with Tariel personaly. I need approve this too, how and why? this is offtopic anyway...

P.S. you are talked like you know how to work this setups! why you talk if you do not know?

First of all in one russian forum, there is member name "Tariel" who supposed to be Tariel Kapanadze. Is this true is that him ?

Other thing, this man for example has kind of different theory than yours

WHY is your every post related to SR and his ferrite core.  Who cares about SR and Ferrite if Tariel device use NO ferrite core. I dont see ANY relation between manipulating ferrite core and Tariel desing, if you are alrady here better give us clues about Tariel work. 

We can be here for 1000 years on forums without discovery.

BASIC principle can only be discovered by accident or can be GIVEN by GOD. You can not think new principle it never works that way.  Principle is given to Tariel and you, and you should keep it secret or share it. All work in the middle is kind of nonsense. I dont thnk anyone will crack this out just by too small clues..

[grizli]

In  reality energy send equals energy received after the loses. without energy send there is no energy received. That state  above fact that receiver is feed by transmitter.
In previous experiments with radio there was no power supply to receiver.
Therefore it is possible to create energy transfer using scalar waves.Scalar  Wave represents independently powered "repeaters-cells" able to transfer energy at no loss level as that energy is independent from the carrier (repeater-cell).
The recovery of energy utilized by "repeater-cell" take place at "it's own expense" similar to  magnet field recovery
<sup>(vertical repealing magnets in glass tube,one is pushed by  vector down e.g hand or force-recovers)
Than if there is dependency established between transmitter and receiver in the way that now we have transceivers from the both sides. That structure becomes permanent coupler in which energy from one is used to feed energy of the second and reverse.
There is no longer deal with losses that could be utilized same way as by Kapanadze or SR.
Part of energy received could be used to sustain motion of transmitter.
Such coupling is realized by the means of backward communication fallowing previously received energy.

Wesley</sup>

THERE IS NO electromagnetic wave in TC transmitter there is just electrostatic field. WE KNOW that EM wave dimished by squzare of distance= TC  reciever at 50km feels PRACTICLY no EM radiation.
I think its we actually just send "information" NOT the energy

Many thinker think that scalar or radianth energy is kind of information .  REciever starts to oscilate by ground "sense".

Lets just think about this:

WE have really good TC transmitter with ver very high Q facotr. we have reciever 50 km away .. at such distance reciever cant feel pracicly NO EM wave , an not even capacity effect  cause height of top capacity of transmitter is much shorter than reciever distance or lety say 50km..

What we have in transmitter :? we actually have HUGE REACTIVE nergy oscilating.. lets say 100MW easily but we if big TC transmitter has no looses energy used to drive it is very low..

I dont see ANY WAY how will transmitter feel reciever as RESISTANCE in seeries or paralel to LC resonance. If transmitter cant feel reciever than LC oscilation is unaffected and energy is NOT used.



Please comment!

[dllabarre]

See how when things are going good, experiments are happening, positive energy & thoughts are flowing, these "theorists" and "arm chair" people show up to derail the positive flow?

Don't continue replying to them.
Just ignore their posts.


DonL