Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 390 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

I think that sigma16 has given the right answer.Electrons are pumped first from big copper coil (made from tube) into ground and then return when this copper coil is fully positively charged.Then again and impulse of negative HV is inductively charging copper coil into positive HV potential and electrons escape ito ground via thick stranded wire.
Hmm..the same could be truth for SR device, just copper tube replaced by ferrite core with a stranded wire tap directly on it. Can someone confirm if SR device had a wire supposedly tapping directly to ferrite rings ?

forest

ok,now a BIG QUESTION : how to geenrate HV NEGATIVE potential on coil ? Something like big electrostatic negative charge

LtBolo

Quote from: baroutologos on November 24, 2010, 02:38:00 AM
No offence meant by that. We are all speculating here. The thing that i cannot personally tolarate is people around presenting ideas and widely circulated speculations around the Net as facts. (not you my friend since you more that once told its all about speculations)

Not offended, but thank you. I voice speculation to stimulate discussion, but I do a great deal of experimentation too, which informs my speculations and theories. I will always use terms like 'probably', 'maybe', 'I think' if I am not sure of something, and never try and project something as true unless I am sure that it is. I agree with you...there is a lot of junk pushed as truth that isn't, and that is not only frustrating, it is destructive.

iceweller

Forest, this is a key question and has been motive of discussion regarding the TC setup. Is the output of a tuned TC positive or negative? The general answer would be AC but unfortunately it's not that simple. The way I see it is that one impulse or current rush is more than the opposite one (it's biased) so we cannot be talking about regular AC, more of an unbalanced sinus, more negative than positive or viceversa. I think the key here is the SG and the tuning and frequency of operation. The whole discussion revolves around the possibility to generate static using a TC (or any properly setup coil). I think you asked a proper question and in the answer lies one of the keys of the operation of the device.
   Regarding SR's device, it could be possible that his one wire GND connection "pushes and pulls" electrons thus creating an AC current which induces a current in the coil - so the coil acts as a stimulator/exciter and generator at the same time. Of course this setup must be evidently somewhat different respect to Tariel's one shown in the video. I would concentrate on Tariel's device even if I think both (or any) of these kinds of devices must have the same working principle.
  Anyhow Forest, I asked myself the same question.


LtBolo

Quote from: cosmoLV on November 24, 2010, 10:22:08 AM
OK, i see you all are fail on the ferrite, while Russians are doing this job very good ;) No Free energy, but better than anyone here.

No free energy, but they are doing a great job? So they are 300% better failures?!? That doesn't make sense Cosmo. I can light bulbs all day...in fact with just a cap and a spark gap...no ferrite required. I'll be impressed when I see them or you or anyone else post a working design. Until then, comments like that aren't helpful.

I have tried your recommendations 50 ways, and simply do not see anything interesting from it.