Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 390 Guests are viewing this topic.

LtBolo

Quote from: wattsup on February 07, 2011, 06:21:40 PM
Guys should stop thinking TK is sick because of his device...

Through spark gaps and capacitive discharges, Tesla coils accelerate electrons fast enough to gain observable kinetic energy. When an electron reaches a kinetic energy level of 124eV or more and then suddenly slows down, it dumps an X-ray photon. High output FE devices can easily produce energy levels like that, and I am personally quite convinced that is exactly where FE comes from...a resonant coil that moves electrons at a high enough energy level to start absorbing and emitting photons...while not depleting the resonant energy in the coil. That theory answers all of the major questions and has support from tons of existing science.

I am not convinced that anybody in this thread is close enough to getting real results to endanger themselves...but...if you do manage to get something working at a high energy level, I very strongly suggest that you protect yourself. If TK has been bathing himself in X-rays for 5 years...he could have very easily given himself cancer, and could be far sicker than just diabetes.

ramset

Perhaps some kind of detector, Geiger or Xray Or ?
Would be useful in experiments ?
For tuning Purposes and safety?
May sound Whacky, but acceleration causing an event that registers on one of these devices could be what this all leads to?

Chet




Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

core

  Been working on perfecting a 'discharge' circuit for my coil. This circuit I believe is more like a Disruptive charging then Disruptive discharge. I am utilizing an inductor to increase the charge on a capacitor. What has me surprised a bit is how much additional charge over input voltage can be added to the capacitor. In the below wiring diagram points 'A' and 'B' are my rapid break points. Depending how fast you break the points negotiates the amount of charge sent to the cap. The faster, the greater the charge.

  At power up the capacitor is charged to 150 volts, depending how fast I short points A and B I can raise the charge to 220 volts. One question I have is 'Why does the sudden disruption across the cap. raise the voltage so much higher?' I'm guessing it has to do with the rapid creation then collapsing of the magnetic field in the inductor. Another question is 'Why does the speed of disruption between points 'A' and 'B' vary the voltage widely'?

  As far as controlling the circuit can anyone recommend a Transistor or Mosfet that can handle the power switching. I also build a mechanical break with a DC motor. Unfortunately the points I used where not 'beefy' enough and disintegrated within thirty seconds or so. Any advice on how to make and break the points electronically would be appreciated. I know some transistors have some 'bleed through'. To get maximum voltage rise there can not be any bleed through it must be solid 'on' and 'off' very disruptive.

  In the mean time I an designing a new mechanical fast switching break. Any idea's?

Respectfully,

Core


Magluvin

I wonder if there are new devices today like a chip or transistors sized detectors that we could build our own xray and such detectors. Ill check around. wouldnt be a bad idea in any case. Jimboot said his Ossie motor gave him headaches or nausia toward the end. Then he disappeared for a bit. He came back recently but his motor was far different from before. Just thought that to be odd.
Safety should be a concern when even the suggestion of radiation for any device comes along. And from there, we should be able to determine if other projects of similar natures should be taken seriously. 

Ill look into some cheap solutions for those that are interested.  ;]

Mags

Magluvin

Hey core

The inductor acts as an electrical flywheel. Inductance is the opposition to current change.
So once current is flowing, it still wants to go for a bit.  Thats how you are getting more. I covered this quite a bit in Energy Amplification and I found that the voltage can be near double, which you have shown. It works in the Falstad circuit sim also, just as it does for real.   See that was what I was thinking about with the tpu. He uses the word Kick a lot and I think he was kicking the flywheel. Maybe. ;]

Mags