Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 172 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

LtBolo

Hats off to YOU!

You are great thinker. Yes,I believe this is how Kapanadze coil works. By accelerating displacement current while condensing it into normal current . Before throwing away this concept look again at "green box" video last part and what kind of device is Kapanadze pointing at when he told about stolen idea. Then look at other video with clear plastic box and see the core of power coil. Then ask why Kapanadze didn't patented coil ?

Terbo

Quote from: cosmoLV on April 21, 2011, 05:59:54 AM
This is not the SR patent but he are suggested it: http://www.failiem.lv/down.php?i=anslwn&n=_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0_.doc

Kapanadze's design certainly resembles Meyer's Fe56 transmutation device shown in the Czech patent document referenced above.

Now take a look at this video just released:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Urdotg_CPJo

It appears to be an overunity demonstration of a Kapanadze-like coil.  However, at 16:54 into this video, the author holds up the Meyer transmutation patent document and uses it to describe the components in his experiment.  Can someone provide a translation of his narrative?
That which does not kill us makes us stronger - Nietzsche

forest

If REALLY Meyer device works by transmutation then it is based on non-reversible process Fe56->Fe54 and dangerous radiation. I wonder if there is a process which can reverse it, maybe by  heating iron ?
I'm rather suspicious about this patent, it violates every magnetic amplifier used excessively in the past.

cosmoLV

Quote from: LtBolo on April 21, 2011, 01:35:42 PM
I've actually been studying the Michel Meyer article for several days now, and have a theory about the copper device...not the Fe56 transmutation device.

Electrons in a certain orbital resonate at a certain frequency, and this is directly related to the waves observed when they jump orbits. Like anything resonant, when we subject those electrons to energy at the same frequency, they will increase their resonance level until they have enough energy to break the orbit. What happens when they break orbit? And what happens when many electrons break orbit at once?

A metal's resistivity is determined by how many free electrons it has and how strongly they cling to the atom. Current flow is normally the process of one electron pushing its way in, and another getting pushed out and moving to the next atom...all the way down the wire. 'Free' is not really so free at all. But what happens when the electron gets resonated with enough energy to break free on its own?

My theory is that when that happens, the electrons are truly free and effectively the copper becomes a superconductor for as long as the electrons remain free...probably a short period of time.

If I were to take that theory and design a device to employ it, what would it look like? It would have several parts:
1. It would have a central copper shaft where the electrons would be excited.
2. It would have a coil surrounding that shaft that would resonate at a sub-harmonic of the electron frequency of copper's outer orbital. The tuning is critical.
3. That coil would need to be excited by as broadband a source as possible (preferably a spark), and that excitation would need to be at the resonant frequency of the coil, or a sub-harmonic thereof.
4. It would have an additional coil or electrostatic plate that would be there to nudge the electrons in the central shaft in one direction when it becomes super conductive. It would need to do so in a way that would not interact magnetically with the shaft, only electrostatically, since the resulting current will be very high and will produce a very strong magnetic field. It would probably be offset to one side of the device.
5. A little fuzzy on the last part...not sure whether you would need it or not...but you may require another coil to convert the expanding magnetic field from the superconductive center shaft into a usable current to the load. It may be possible that the center shaft would perform this function without another coil.

Not saying that is Kapanadze's device, but it sure sounds a great deal like it.

I would expect the superconductive process to act in waves. It would take some period of time for the electrons to get to an escape energy, that time would be a function of the intensity of the excitation. Once they broke free they would move freely, but eventually get recaptured. Then the process would repeat. The natural tendency of resonant objects to sync up would cause that process to operate in batch, rather than continuous. I could easily see the pulses coming in 10s, 100s or 1000s of pulses per second, and might be responsible for the claimed low frequency of Kapanadze's device. Adjusting the excitation energy would allow you to tune the output frequency.

Per this theory, any sharp discharge could cause momentary freeing of electrons, but the resonant nature of the process I'm describing would permit the cycles to run longer and be easier to harness. It provides a very nice explanation for Stephen Mark's 'kicks', and all of the high current phenomena associated with sparks or very sharp edges.

Another possible addition to the theory is electron acceleration/deceleration. When the electrons resonate free, and then are moving through the wire much like a vacuum, they are free to absorb quantum energy. Upon recapture at the atom, they emit that excess energy...much like the heat pump analogy I have used ad nauseum. Resonance frees the electron like the evaporation process, and while free, the electron absorbs energy from the quantum lattice like gas absorbs additional heat, and the recapture emits the extra energy like compression releases heat.

Just a theory. Flame away.

Close to True :)

----

(i want to remind for most here who are new here that Tariel don't use Ferrite core) and Delamorto video was fake.
Delamorto video are made for Provacation ;)
Keep your chakras opened :)

LtBolo

Quote from: forest on April 21, 2011, 02:35:31 PM
If REALLY Meyer device works by transmutation then it is based on non-reversible process Fe56->Fe54 and dangerous radiation. I wonder if there is a process which can reverse it, maybe by  heating iron ?
I'm rather suspicious about this patent, it violates every magnetic amplifier used excessively in the past.

It emits 2 neutrons in transmuting from Fe56 to Fe54, and the rate at which that happened would have everything to do with whether it was safe or not. Regardless, pretty sure that once they leave, there is nothing you can do to cram those suckers back in. ;)

Long term, it seems that the electron resonance method is the safer device...if we can figure out how to make it work. Meyer's device looked deceptively simple, but I'm sure the devil is in the details. The resonance of the excitation coil would be critical. The resonance of the central shaft may also be critical...it may also need to be resonant at a subharmonic of the electron excitation frequency. And then once you get electrons to break free, what form does the power take, and how do you get it out? It may be simple in theory, and very difficult in practice...