Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

You are convinced as most, including the patent holders, that there is some magical combination of frequencies that produces NMR in the element under study. This is not my thinking and I have read comments from SR on a Russian site that also discredit that belief.

NMR? Only in Meyer's iron device. And am I not convinced that SR's device was strictly based on the Fe56 transmutation patent, only suggested that is one possibility. If SR has suggested otherwise, I am happy to change my thinking. The presence of a ferrite core doesn't preclude it being based on similar principle to Meyer's copper excitation...which isn't NMR, BTW.

While I don't intend to discuss the subject here, I have two inventions that are related to this and my experience of what is taking place corresponds to what SR alluded to.

I will further that statement by telling you that one of those inventions was stolen and patented by an electronics company that claims to promote free energy after I made the mistake of disclosing to a member of this forum years ago. The technology was shelved. I have not disclosed the second technique and don't plan to for obvious reasons.

Then why are you here? And why do you keep coming back? I am growing very weary with those that claim special knowledge, and can not or will not either substantiate it or disclose it. If you have a functional device that was stolen, what better way to screw them than screwed you than to disclose on a broad scale...anonymously if need be.

Your actions and declared motives seem to be in conflict.

I will tell you that in your classically trained view of electricity, you have overlooked something they don't really teach much about. You struggle to account for where the energy comes from without an accounting of the energy used and the energy gained or even the process used to extract it. It should take exactly as much energy to extract the two electrons as you would get from them.

Then enlighten me.

How does the gain take place? The information is probably out there but you have to connect the dots with some super long lines that stretch to the end of the electron sea. There is far more going on in a hairpin than resonance, harmonics, overtones and 1Q.

Where? I think it comes from accel/decel as I have said many times. The harmonic excitation is simply a mechanism to derive free electrons which can then be used to pump quantum energy. Is that correct? It's as good as any idea I've heard. As for what is going on in the hairpin, I don't claim to know all that is happening, nor would I be surprised that there is more happening than I am aware. It seems odd to me that you would first suggest that the spectrum of a dead short is uninteresting, then turn around and talk about all the good things that might be there.

[ePrick]

NMR? Only in Meyer's iron device. And am I not convinced that SR's device was strictly based on the Fe56 transmutation patent, only suggested that is one possibility. If SR has suggested otherwise, I am happy to change my thinking. The presence of a ferrite core doesn't preclude it being based on similar principle to Meyer's copper excitation...which isn't NMR, BTW.


Then why are you here? And why do you keep coming back? I am growing very weary with those that claim special knowledge, and can not or will not either substantiate it or disclose it. If you have a functional device that was stolen, what better way to screw them than screwed you than to disclose on a broad scale...anonymously if need be.

Your actions and declared motives seem to be in conflict.

Then enlighten me.

Where? I think it comes from accel/decel as I have said many times. The harmonic excitation is simply a mechanism to derive free electrons which can then be used to pump quantum energy. Is that correct? It's as good as any idea I've heard. As for what is going on in the hairpin, I don't claim to know all that is happening, nor would I be surprised that there is more happening than I am aware. It seems odd to me that you would first suggest that the spectrum of a dead short is uninteresting, then turn around and talk about all the good things that might be there.

If you have a functional device that was stolen, what better way to screw them than screwed you than to disclose on a broad scale...anonymously if need be.

Per the norm you make an assumption. You don't know what you don't know. Furthermore, I have no obligation to share everything I know or have invented nor does anyone else. People give and take what they want.

Where? I think it comes from accel/decel as I have said many times. The harmonic excitation is simply a mechanism to derive free electrons which can then be used to pump quantum energy. Is that correct?

Quarktoo has stated hundreds of times you can't have a free energy device without acceleration. I guess I missed your many comments on the subject.

Normally when we think of acceleration, we think of accelerating a single object in a single direction. In the case of the hair pin, we accelerate two objects on a collision course. This consumes energy as Tesla put it. The energy that is consumed are the 1 or 2 free electrons that make up the electron sea in the conductor. This changes the atomic packing factor crystalline structure of the face centered cubic structure of the copper for an instant measured in plank moments.

SR likened it to being able to light something on fire and have it un-burn so you can repeat the process - close enough. He didn't go into or probably understand the mechanism that provides the energy gain but knows it is there and how to extract it. Gray motor, Hubbard coil, etc., work the same way.

The energy gain comes from the superconductive magnetic field that is created probably through atom packing based on my experiments. I could provide an experiment that would prove this violation of Maxwell's equations but that would not be in my best interests.

BTW - I spelled it all out for you in clues assuming you were sharp enough to see it. "Super", "connect the dots - (Atom packing)",  "electron sea", etc.

Take a chill pill Bolo, this hole isn't big enough for two pricks.

Ed Prick

[LtBolo]

Furthermore, I have no obligation to share everything I know or have invented nor does anyone else.

No, you certainly don't.

I do think that when you make absolute statements of fact, you must be prepared to back them or admit that it is speculation. To make statements of fact, "I built an overunity device" or "I know for certain how they work", and then fall back and refuse to substantiate the claim is very problematic to me. Smacks of what someone might do if they were being intentionally subversive. And by subversive, I don't strictly mean in the sense of blocking progress. Subversion can come in many forms with many intents.

Which does beg the question, though, why are you here and why do you keep coming back? Everyone has a motive. What's yours?

Quarktoo has stated hundreds of times you can't have a free energy device without acceleration. I guess I missed your many comments on the subject.

I have spoken of it many times, and emphasized that I consider heat pump gain to be a similar phenomenon...although obviously different for many reasons. For me it is a huge revelation in what can and does happen at a quantum level that can invalidate our understanding of energy conservation.

From the accel/decel perspective, I am struck by the fact that a photon is emitted when an electron strikes metal with enough energy. When did it absorb the photon? Where did it come from? If I draw free electrons in a vacuum onto a charged plate, they will accelerate into the plate and strike it with an energy consistent with the accel due to strength of the field. The net charge of the plate will change by the number of electrons, and the cost of that transaction is whatever the loss in energy of the plate amounted to. From the plate's perspective, that is no different than a wire supplying the same electrons from a ground source or anywhere else.

But there is one huge difference between the two: The wire supplying ground current will not allow the electrons to free flow in the same way that electrons in a vacuum do, and they will not be accelerated in the same manner, nor will they end up emitting photons. If the energy cost to the plate was the same in both cases, then it would seem that we have an energy imbalance.

If we can harmonically induce free electrons in metal (induced superconductivity?), then the acceleration that would occur in a vacuum seems more likely to occur in the metal. The resonance harmonics are simply a means to an end, an implementation detail.

Just a theory. I don't claim to have special knowledge.

[AbbaRue]

I have mentioned this before on this forum,
the following link is for an electronics circuit applet that will let you
test out what a circuit does before building it. 
http://www.falstad.com/circuit/
That NAND Gates schematic could be tested with it to see what type of output you get.
It even has a sample of a tesla coil circuit, including the spark gap.
My setup uses a 555 timer circuit to run the flyback, and I use large slide pots for the 555 timer controls so I can vary
the frequency with great accuracy.  Here is the link for the flyback driver I use:
(I use the Buz11 Mosfet and MPSA06 Transistor instead of the IRF510 and 2N2222)

http://www.elecpod.com/circuit/digital/2010/06062277.html

[stivep]

Kapanadze is not only device but your money spend ..spend it smart.Not necessarily repeating my mistakes.

Few things:
Analyzer.
which analyzer?
Spectrum?
Not much of help.
I have had two.
The problem is with spectrum occupied by signal.
So what you going to see is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q8r2ikJtZ0

Noise.
I agree that in some videos you are able to see components and areas of square signal but. On ham radio I was able to just see the signal level of that signals anywhere from 30kHz to 500 MHz.
It is good to have it. But that should be not only one device you have in the lab.
The video I have seen posted by one of you gentleman show Vector Signal Analyzer not Spectrum Analyzer.
Summary:
1.Ham radio receiver - not so good gives you sound level of noise You will not spend hours tuning to it.
2. Spectrum Analyzer- gives you spectrum and components in one shot.
If you have Advantest 100Hz- 8 GHz this will give you a lot. Power factor
and math.
3. Vector Signal Analyzer- ( with the CRT)this will give you phase all kind of demodulation AM< FM< SSB PW,PSK,F1,F2,F3,A1,A2,A3A,A3J,
and you can listen to noise as well.
I do not have one.
4.Vector Network Analyzer Advantest R3754B 10kHz- 150 MHz.
absolutely magnificent piece of equipment but.
You will measure everything NOT under Power.
From one hand this is good.All of impedances and dependencies, SWR, behavior of coils  and resonance circuits Phase and amplitudes, complete characteristic, display Polar, Smith Chart, and so on.
 
Than you find out that VNA Advantest starts from 10KHz .So what about
0-10KHz than
you buy

5. HP-4194A Impedance Gain Phase Analyzer.
from 100Hz - 100MHz.
You may feel sorry for yourself that you could of have just this one and that would be enough.
You will measure all of impedances and all possible impedance elements against any you think of . Say Z-Cs, Lx-Rs, Rs-Ls,Ls-Q,Cs-Rs and so on so on...You will measure everything NOT under Power.
but when you purchase fixtures.
Without that You can only measure properties of  Vector Network Analysis
The first fixture will allow you to get only from 100Hz to 15 MHz.

Than You may think of selling VNA Advantest but Advantest is alive it is brilliant and vibrating as HP is mule,is slow. You get  eventually what you expect to get but life action? Impossible.

You feel trapped. You do not want to spend  money but  you have went so far.. so close to have everything Kapanadze project  require.

Than you look at
6. Ailtech NM-7A Stoddart EMI/Field Intensity Meter
http://cgi.ebay.com/Ailtech-NM-7A-Stoddart-EMI-Field-Intensity-Meter-/190522930946?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2c5c0d3702#ht_4240wt_969
 
How nice would be to have it.
Note:Stoddart  must say on the panel not Alitech!!!Check covered frequency specs before you buy.

Disadvantage? very narrow selectivity only 3KHz.max but if you need to go very narrow to tune your resonance circuit to right frequency under load in real working environment that is the right tool. ( I do not have it)
   
Instead of working with board oscillator it would be nice to have ready to use 5000V regulated Square wave right  to the spark.
this is not easy.

7. Fluke 5205A ceramic tubes..
Fluke 5205A Precision Power Amplifier presentation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soWfuL_ayNI

I have got one.
So what is wrong with it?
Benefits: even if  manual say that it goes form 0-100kHz it will go to 10MHz
With easiness.
Power amplification 1:100. that means  10V delivered to input gives you 1000V output beautiful Square wow. You can adjust at your generator any properties of signal. No distortion.

Disadvantage:  You can go max 1200V that is all than you need to wind step up transformer 1:4 in very special way You taking ferrite core from Flyback and you wind primary one layer,secondary second layer,primary third layer, and so on ... If you do it right you will get close to square at 5000V

That might be something you have found in many of SR/Kapanadze  secrets of winding. But another thing to consider is proper  impedance matching output of Fluke is 50 OHm.

All of these information are of one who does not want to  go in to equipment to find that  he need another one. The info is  here the choice is yours.

There was something like Never Ending Story movie.. That is what I experienced to be trapped in.
From the onter hand - I love it .
That what is bad - It is time and money consuming.

tips:
-Never Ever buy  New One!!!
-Never ever buy not checking if there is  the same for less.
-Always ( ebay) send email asking for lower price or call and negotiate.
- never assume that if something is listed for $6000 seller will not sale it  for $150 .Im many cases he will.
- Never believe if you see  2-10-50 offers for the item and the time left to end of auction is still say 1 day or even one hour. You are being used and abused there is nobody real behind that bids it is just for you to think that this is hot item.
You need to click with you mouse  on these bids and immediately you see list of bids  than click on each of the bids and on the right side you will see involvement of bider with seller  You  will see percentage of scam.
If the price is still OK  bid with extra attention.
Always check score of seller by clicking on seller "sold items number"
Read negative and neutral comments.
when you finally purchase Item
-NEVER PLACE YOUR FEEDBACK before you receive your item and examine if it is good.
-Never sign to the postman receiving package before you open it.

Example:I have had package from China
The VFD was damaged.
The seller was nice till 1 month from the time of purchase past by.
Than I could no longer place  negative comment on his profile.
Than he said that I have signed to the postman that package  was in good shape and no damage.
Yes 'I did sign but that I have received package without even opening it  that's all.

Than seller demanded additional $80 to send me replacement  and he demanded  for me to spend money to send back the damaged one on my own expense.




Real buyer place bid 8 seconds before  the end

At the end If you smart you will spend between 2-10% of the real value of equipment.I was not always as smart. I was learning.

Real good
spectrum analyzer= $2200 color CRT!!
VNA=$2200 color CRT!!
Gain phase analyzer HP 4194A ?? forget about it.........color CRT!! but if you buy it for 4000 than you damn......lucky

Power amplifier $300
Tektronix TDS 654C oscilloscope $650-$1000 color CRT!!
If it helps to someone to do not be ripped of by the sellers I'll be glad to here it.

Wesley