Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

@Mannix and @all

So what do I have to do with my flyback transformer? Tear it open and remove the diodes since the WNY device did not have any and there are none shown in the diagram that @T-1000 posted days ago. So I have to remove the diodes. Doctor Welby, we'll have to operate. Hmmmmm. Will it survive the trauma is the question? lol

Interlude.................10 minutes later........

Well I tried using a hack saw blade and started sawing off an edge of the circuit side of the flyback transformer, but there is no way you can do it. It is all encapsulated in epoxy. The only other way is to use a hot air gun and melt away the material. This is highly unpractical and will surely result in damage to the coil wires that will require reconnection. So this is not a good idea to use standard flyback with the WNY diagram.

The youtube I referred to in my previous post shows a circuit, shows it sparking, and is doing it with the standard flyback without any internal modifications or diode removal, so maybe we need to marry that to the WNY diagram. I have put his diagram below since this is one way to do it.

We already know TK did it in many ways starting with the green box inverter, with car battery start up, to his plexi unit with the 9 volt startup. These all confirm that the initial ramp up method is not important. So to see the differences in units, we know the initial ramp up can vary, so what does  not change. The TK coil. So all that before the TK coil is mainly up to what is practicable while the TK coil remains an unchanged method. 

Creating the first spark can be accomplished in many ways. Tesla did it in the Tesla Ozone Patent using damped wave pulsing via a rotary switching method and his device produced sparks that we call corona discharge producing ozone gas. @T-1000 mentioned that his first vacuum spark gap is useful to hold in ozone gas and u.v. rays. There are many ozone circuits out there today that can do the same thing. Also there are countless U.V. lamp circuits that use high voltage as well. Being in the water treatment business I have a bunch of UV circuits in the shop so I will take a few on Monday and see what can be done. I think I have an older ozone generator as well. Guys can just contact your local water treatment company and ask them if they would have a few ozone or UV circuits they would like to donate for R&D.

What I am trying to say here is that just because @T-1000 had an old flyback, it does not mean that is the only solution to the first spark.

wattsup

[energia9]

first of all why can we not have diode in the flyback? because they had no diodes in it?  it has been tried with a flyback that has diodes in it or not?  better try it first. saves us time and money...  please...

IF IT HAS BEEN TRIED and apparatus dont work with diodes being inserted to FB coil.
THEN:--->

The one site Tonyx posted is a Hungarian site,  it costs 4605 Hungarian Forints and it is  13.4 british pounds , or 21 dollars,  i can get an old tv cheaper than buying from them, postage is possibly more expensive then the item it self, 
It might be the best possible idea if you get little 220-12 volt adapters, take out the thin wire, get paper, and hydraulic mineral oil, get a ferrite, wind it to required frequency and you are done!

look how simple it is:

http://yamanashimasamune.blogspot.com/2011/07/high-voltage-experiments-part-3.html



note:  Use a low loss ferrite, one used in flyback's ,   

[xenomorphlabs]

@Wattsup: It all depends upon how important the avramenko plug (or better reverse diodes) is for the operation.
A standard flyback without modification can't work because the voltage tripler caps/diodes would also change the resonance frequency besides rectifying.
I also don't think that TK worked with voltages much higher than 5-10 kV (tiny spark distance in green box and ignition module)
This all needs testing, if Stivep's group device works with less voltage.
That all is based upon the assumption that the output is directly proportional to
the HV voltage. Only indication would be the turkey device which obviously used more than a foot of streamers for 100kW.

[energia9]

@Wattsup: It all depends upon how important the avramenko plug (or better reverse diodes) is for the operation.
I also don't think that TK worked with voltages much higher than 5-10 kV (tiny spark distance in green box and ignition module)
This all needs testing, if Stivep's group device works with less voltage.
That all is based upon the assumption that the output is directly proportional to
the HV voltage. Only indication would be the turkey device which obviously used more than a foot of streamers for 100kW.

So if the device is voltage dependent, it is partly up to how strong we ionize air,
if we replicate device then we have to try all possibility, even trying to use device in vacuum

This could be the way tesla did it before, in his patent he describes everything,   even that he have created tens of thousands of horsepowers,  he says energy is magnified tens of thousands of times
I would like to share this image i drew from the patent. and i have carefully read all patents related to it, and im certain that this is the 1,
As i replicate wesleys,Arunas aidas device, i was working on this too
i have allready made the rotary devices, and brushes, i will share all data here for everyone to see,

[hexoda]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj5KX7_JHXo&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqSHFGoqUhk&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPRIAn8XCyg&feature=player_embedded