Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 176 Guests are viewing this topic.

Goat

Hey Wesley & Team

I've really enjoyed seeing your progress but there is a lot of questions being asked about you're progress between the first working circuit and now you're 2nd (working?) circuit in the last video at the end. 

Is it your theory that the #2 cct should work as the #1 cct?  Or has it been proven to operate as the #1 cct?  Hope that makes sense :)

Is there a difference between the #1 cct and the #2 cct other than the copper plates substituted for coaxial cable shielding instead of the copper plates in the #1 cct?

Regards,
Paul

energia9

im very close to replicate, the pressure will be soon off from wesley and others shoulder.  everything will be clear,   
and people.
Never forget
Life is nothing without love. 
without love: life would be violent for all.
So strenghten it. and we can make this place all harmonious.
positive feelings are your best tool to defend yourselves from any negative energy.
Peace

Goat

@energia9

I hear you and I agree with you, let's return to this experiment one piece at a time and make it work for the betterment of mankind.

If we are divided we fall.

There's been alot of changes so it would be good to straighten out cct#1 and cct#2 as individual ccts to clear up any changes to the original cct that worked, then proceed to the next, wouldn't you agree?

In any scientific experiment the original project should be "Frozen" and then replicated, this is not the way this project is progressing and it's confusing people, but I don't want to stop progress just want to clear things up for onlookers.

Regards,
Paul

ramset

Wesley
Nobody ? nothing?
Mister don't even try to think that way!!
My language does not seem to have the words to tell you how wonderful you are!!

??
All our children and their children will maybe come up with those words??

Wesley ,You show us selfless Love, for total strangers at great personal cost ,asking for no return??

Energia has it right............... and so do you !!

Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

stivep

Quote from: Goat on October 31, 2011, 07:40:16 PM
Hey Wesley & Team

I've really enjoyed seeing your progress but there is a lot of questions being asked about you're progress between the first working circuit and now you're 2nd (working?) circuit in the last video at the end. 

Is it your theory that the #2 cct should work as the #1 cct?  Or has it been proven to operate as the #1 cct?  Hope that makes sense :)

Is there a difference between the #1 cct and the #2 cct other than the copper plates substituted for coaxial cable shielding instead of the copper plates in the #1 cct?

Regards,
Paul

Two of the concepts are different in nature both of them works, both are capable of 1KW of output.
schematic from first  video uses TK like concept..
schematic from second video uses ( possibly)not TK concept  but both are related to Tesla concept.

Both of the schematics uses spark gap  (at least one.)

second schematic is theoretically  less expensive and seems to be easier to replicate. but ferrite core properties are of very importance. Not every ferrite will works and it may  have to do with geometry of the core.. Suggestion use ferrite from old CTR tube.. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We do not know as of yet what  material of the core is the best Ma Zink looks to be the right one.

Wesley


You want to understand how the device work????
educate yourself as I did!!!!!!!!!!!

And message to  some of Russian KGB agents go and F..k yourself trolls
http://www.intl-magnetics.org/pdfs/SFG-98.pdf
http://www.chinadmegc.com/chinadmegc/english/web/about3_202.asp
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=DTPSDS000029000001000343000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes&ref=no
http://www.fdk.co.jp/laboratory/ce_hon-e.htm
http://www.esuppliersindia.com/b-l-k-ferrites-pvt-ltd-/deflection-yoke-core-pr255703-sFP-swf.html
http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_tvfaq6.html#TVFAQ_001
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/Overunity.htm
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/FieldDensity.htm
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/Overunity.htm
https://www.dmt-nexus.me/doc/Ether%20Physics.pdf
http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1360/29MagFlds/HmwkSol.html
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/public/etd-543273119623370/etd.pdf
http://www.studyphysics.ca/2007/30/08_atomic/46_chambers.pdf  you might think this has nothing to do with it ?  well it does