Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

FQ 50 HZ ( it is vary betwen 48-52 Hz) is master! Fq of 382 Khz is slave FQ!

I expected the LF (~50Hz) to be the slave frequency, and the FRF to be the master frequency because FRF comes from the ferrite material and LF is artificially excited by a signal generator.

This statement is in conflict with the whole measurement procedure outlined by T-100 and Stivep, from which it is apparent that the master frequency originates with the ferrite.

THE FREQUENCIES ARE NOT ALWAYS THE SAME as properties of ferrite are not the same.
...
Do not count on fixed frequencies..  The whole process is not that easy as it looks like.
1. Connect  50 winds  to Vector Network Analyzer input
2. Connect  (ekran) shield / cooper strip winding  to output.
3. Analyze  if you see peak on 1.2Mhz to 1.8 Mhz
4. Then connect  generator with square or  ramp at frequency of peak say 1.3 MHz to    (ekran) shield / copper strip then tune it left right to maximum amplitude of 50 winds ( OSCILLOSCOPE AT OUTPUT)
5. than read the frequency and voltage on 50 winds ( OSCILLOSCOPE AT OUTPUT)
6. than connect generator to 50winds with frequency of readout
ALL OF THE STEPS SHOULD BE DONE  WITH ONE GENERATOR ONLY!!! AT THE TIME..

[Ganzha]

To Verpies!

Here are no conflicts because nobody knows a Theory about this ubnormalous ferrite reactor from Tiger!

Tiger said that he already works with this devices more that 1 year and tryed to explain - how to replicate but only Arunas and some more persons got success....but nobody know Theory...because we havent one!

[dynoc]

Ok Ganzha, THANKS for this important information, (and thanks to Tyger,too).

But Verpies have done a good question.
In procedure explain by Arunas, first, find BRF....
then, find FRF...
and at last, tune 15 turns coil with about 50 Hz.

BUT! I think that Tyger tell us to use 50 Hz as master (to lock FRF and BFR, so this frequenxy MUST be related in "integer" number, in one post, somebody talk about this ratio...but I don't find now)....then,
we can make a SG with this characteristics?

-D-

[Jdo300]

Hello Everyone,

Regarding the bifilar secondary output winding, did Wesley, T-1000, (or Tiger) give any indications on the method of winding the coils?

To be more specific, if the total number of turns is 150, does that mean we wind coil of 75 turns for the first layer and then, on top of that, wind another layer of 75 turns for the second winding (and then connect as shown in the diagram)

OR

do we take the two wires together and wind them on the core at the same time (essentially interleaving them). Or does this not matter?

I'm planning to get some wire today to begin winding but wanted to be clear on this detail first.

Thanks,
Jason O

[grizli]

Yes, I can see now that my words have been ambiguous.
I meant exactly what you wrote: "Pulsing copper sheet coil and scoping it after pulse goes away"

Now, this "scoping" can be done in several ways:
1) Scoping the 1turn Transverse Coil ( the "copper shield" coil) directly.
2) Scoping the 15turn Primary Coil (classic coil at 90deg.) wound over the Transverse Coil
3) Scoping the 50turn Primary Coil (classic coil at 90deg.) wound over the Transverse Coil

In my last message to you, I meant pt.2 because it is safer for the scope when HV is used to ping the Transverse Coil.

P.S.
For pure measurements the primary coils should not be loaded with anything more than scope probes.

This is againg confusing :

If we scope copper sheet coil alone: why we need to add capacitor to sheet coil in operation ?

MAYBE this : we pulse 50 turn coil and scope sheet coil ,we find ferro resonance frequency, than we put capacitor to sheet coil and pulse and scope sheet coil until we get LC that is equals first frequency we got ..

And most important thing , I am still waiting for answer
Velleman function generator has no input sync signal, how T-1000 managet to sync using that generator ?