Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 549 Guests are viewing this topic.

ElectricGoose

This method will not result in OU.

Just shows...shouting from the rooftops "OU OU!!!" does not result in OU...only people looking like buffoons.  Funny...I thought it was 15w in and 150watts out???!.  Obviously not (as previously stated).  Just imagine..all that SUPPOSED OU and you still can't self run a light.  At some stage be honest with yourself and let the evidence smack some sense into you!!

Time to take that video down off the home page also Stefan.  It slows the site and its downright annoying listening to it.

As Cosmo stated....Wesley has no idea.  This method has nothing to do with kapanadze and you are seeing an illusion of OU only.

baroutologos

Quote from: verpies on November 13, 2011, 04:55:30 PM
I agree, the ferrite halves should be joined together but not glued together.
Preferably joined with a minimal air gap (paper gap) just like on the inventor's working device.

That ferrites should not be constrained has been known for a long time. 
See the 2nd page of the document below (look for the phrase "ferrite bead gotcha"):
http://www.epanorama.net/sff/Power%20Electronics/Uninterruptible_Power_Supplies/Shields%20and%20Sheilding.pdf

@itsu
Do not be so quick to reach the conclusion that you are seeing the resonance of the LF 15turn coil.
Wind the other HF 50-turn coil and compare the frequency peaks between these two coils when they just feed the scope probe.

RLC circuits practically do not resonate when no current flows in them (when resistance (R) is very high) and your scope probe has R in the mega ohm range. 
However, an inductor/coil shorted by a low ESR capacitor is a wholly different story (even if the the capacitor has only several picofarads)...

Stimulating thinking Verpie.

It made me take a look at o-scopes probes composition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_probe
Probes as the article say have a large resistance but this is shunted by a capacitance. So indeed a current will flow.

Then took measurements of mine o-scope. (old Hitachi V-212)
Probe either in x1 or x10 shows an infinity (above 20M) resistance either working or not, whereas it has some x1 90pf and at x10 15pf capacitance.

So in measuring any RLC circuit, i would personally connect o-scope at x 10 probe mode (compansating with adjustments) and taking into consideration that 15pf capacitance (in my case) added to the examined circuit. Avoid the x1 probe due to huge capacitance.

aether22

I have been super busy the last 4-5 days and had no real chance to keep up to date with this, however I think I now understand why T-1000, Wesley and others are giving great detail on some things such as basic construction of the transformer and tuning.

And why they hadn't given (at least hadn't when I stopped reading) any real info on what else is required.

They want us to not know how to build the circuit so we have to try lots of stuff to see what works, and in the proccess improve on the design.

I think they aren't interested in straight reproduction, they want experimentation.

At least this is the most positive spin I can put on such curious partial disclosure.
?To forgive is to set a prisoner free and then discover that the prisoner was you.?  Lewis Smedes

Tito L. Oracion

hmmmm it seems that i smell some hopeless direction here  ::)

Qwert

Quote from: Haan on November 13, 2011, 06:56:45 PM
Please explain what "bucking mode (back-to-back serial opposing)" and "serial reinforcing mode" mean.
Hi.
I guess, a good (at least a partial one) explanation is here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=2300.msg221623#msg221623

"...WHEN TWO TRANSFORMERS ARE OUT OF PHASE WITH EACH OTHER THE SIGNAL IS CANCELLED   
, or when they are connected in reverse of one another. (Actually when one FREQUENCY is in reverse of another!  INVERTED!)Then you can measure all kinds of things going on.
You can generate all kinds of hash and multiple frequencies, and I do mean all kinds.
What I measured during this process was very interesting.
All these frequencies occasionally..."