Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

For those interested in the push-pull circuit for the TL494 then refer to the PDF for the IC on the TI website.
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tl494.pdf
I have included the diagram:

You did not include the 2 power MOSFET transistor output stage (especially their gate drive circuits).
This is not a problem for me, but other less experienced experimenters will have problems designing the power output stage.

[jbignes5]

Steve you guys need to use the magnetic spark gap with that. It's the only way to get clean sparks that are one way or diode like. Any down turn in the pulse and it cancels the next wave via interference patterns. You remember the cymatics and how it operates. I just figured out something Tesla said in a response from the court records. He was asked about undamped waves and Replied that if he used them he would be like all the other electricians. I think with this generator he is only worried about creating a perfect pickup that turns all the force of the blast into a stream and extracts the energy motion into coils that he can generate from. Remember one field works from the same point of origin.  Move that point and you can induce either field you want simply by putting the correct pickup coil that does not slow it's speed but still feels it's tug.


Remember cymatics, the shapes of the salt or sand vibrate and bounce in regular formation because roughly they are all the same shape. The medium or Aether is the plate(surface) to that transducer that gives much motion to the area. In one axis it is thin as the metal plate but wide and high in the other.


I would have to say from a natural stand point that most life would branch forming a triangle. This 3 sided marvel actually not only experimentally in computer graphics proves it statement as the basic shape of anything living. Almost any shape can be modeled in a triangular matrix and I believe thats all matter is on a fundamental level just a simple shape.
The Space in between is always the average of the distance being measured between two points. On sub molecular level that is always in balance. Except when you apply charges it squeezes the tolerances and increases the conductivity of the fields changing this shape. When enough charges are in the material it changes phase. From solid to flowing. This must be the same thing in the Aetheric fields because Tesla said he could stiffen it or make it rigid. I believe you can have direction to to this stiffening. Take water. Water reacts to charge level. The lower this level the more stacks and forms stiff connections. What if the Aether does the same thing? This would mean the Aether is the voltage component of this network. Learn how to extract or inject it and you have infinite energy. The bifilar is just that tool. In fact I believe the bifilar is an accelerator of this Aether. It accelerates via induction and redirected counter flow but it also can be used as a one way pickup coil that does not slow down the pulses. It is the railgun personified. A closed form of the bifilar would be considered a self energizing accelerator field coil. With the open version being the pickup coil. There might be another form of the bifilar that would be all of these combined kinda like a feedback controlled coil but that would be a combined unit, more then one bifilar.


I think we have the coils we just need to perfect the wave. Tesla also spoke about how he gets these waves from top dead center of the ac peek. I think this is the key to resonance. fire the spark gap to early and the wave is weak. Fire to late and it is weak again but get it top dead center and maximum wave strength is achieved.

[stivep]

Steve you guys need to use the magnetic spark gap with that.

It is another solution to that.
Using proven  military radar  technology It was amazingly well working for us.
I was in that field for few years of my life.
All of the details will be definitely given to you guys later.


Wesley

[verpies]

New video after all of the corrections

Wesley,

Thanks for your effort in making the latest video.

This video clearly shows the:
1) Physical construction of the Tube device
2) The connections
   a) between the devices terminals
   b) and from the signal generator to the device
   c) from the device to the load
3) The spectrum of the transfer impedance of an abridged device (without the coiled capacitors)

The capacitances and inductances of all the components in the full device are missing, but they we can live without them at this level of development.

However the video still does not show the vital input and output power measurements that have any scientific validity
.
Your argument about power consumption using the encyclopedia lifting/carrying analogy is flawed.
I already illustrated to you how this argument does not hold up in a shunt-regulated power supply which can have the same input power with and without load.  See below.

Anyway, in case of the aforementioned shunt power supply, its input current will not change as I attach a 3ohm load to the output.  The input power will be 72W with and without the load, but the load will dissipate over 8W when connected
According to your thinking a 3ohm load connected to the output of this power supply does not dissipate any power because its input power does not change (72W - 72W = 0W ).

The above matters very much because if the input to the power supply is a clean sine AC waveform and its average rectified voltage is 218V and its average rectified current is 165mA (+15ma under load on output), then the power consumption of the power supply can be anywhere between 0Watts and 40Watts (0-44W under load on output).

If the same measurements are repeated with true RMS amp and voltmeters then the power consumption of the power supply can be anywhere between 0Watts and 33Watts (0-36W under load on output).

If the same measurements are repeated with peak-to-peak amp and voltmeters (or 1ch of oscilloscope), then the power consumption of the power supply can be anywhere between 0Watts and 12Watts (0-13W under load on output)..

So the worst case scenario is that the power supply consumes 44Watts and the worst case difference between the input powers is 4Watts when comparing the scenarios "with load" -  "without load" on the output of the power supply.

Q: Does the above mean that the load (flyback driver) dissipates only 4Watts ?
A: Absolutely not, this data means that the load dissipates from 0W to 44W when connected to the output of this power supply.

Why, you might ask? Because without load the power supply circuit itself consumes 40W of power but with the load connected to its output, the power supply circuit itself can consume 0Watts, hence transferring all of its input power into the load. That's exactly what a Zener diode or a power transistor does in a shunt-power-supply.  In reality the output power will be just a little less than the full input power when fully loaded.

My Zener diode shunt-regulated power supply, clearly illustrates this behavior. Its input/output power efficiency is not constant. Actually it varies widely between the no-load and loaded conditions.  Namely, it is inefficient when unloaded and very efficient when loaded.  The opposite what you might think.

Now the brightness of the 100W light bulb starts to matter when the input power to the Tube device approaches 44W, because the bulb can be visibly lit with much less power (e.g. 30W).

So, Wesley, why don't you measure the electric power at the output of your power supply, or better yet, at the output of your flyback driver.
Preferably using a fast 2-Channel oscilloscope in multiplication mode.

[forest]

jbignes5
You have very good thoughts ! All of them ,really. I agree with you, all I can add is : why Tesla talked about vibration ? Very strange indeed that he always compared his magnifying transmiter to whistle and the wave produced to sound in ether. He surely was right ! It is the vibration produced in electrostatic field propagating unidirectionally like sound (if you doesn't bounce it). I've always stated : you can have houndreds of strange looking devices and even more and all will be working once you found a way to produce the same vibration Tesla did. So where is the problem ?