Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

after experimenting for severall weeks now with this "yoke" device, i have no real results to report (which in itself is a result).

Indeed it is.
Did you try stimulating the core with rotating magnetic field of various frequencies?   ...which means two sinewave currents 90deg. out of phase in two perpendicular coils (see photo).

two perpendicular coils create magnetic rotation...
  See the animation of two orthogonal coil pairs below (click on it to see it rotate):

Did you pulse the core in the remaining 3rd dimension with HV pulses ?

[baroutologos]

@Verpie,

I can feel your frustration man. This forum is full of similar cases, that people claim the utmost unconventional thing yet they deny to do the very basic of power measurment. And if they do at last, and even present a selfrunner, almost noone can replicate.

By no means i do not want to be negatively biased towards every new proposal arriving here, but 99% that is the case.

Weastly group on the other hand, should show some understanding about everybody's eagerness to have a OU device at last since this will be a pshychologic milestone (apart from the usefulness of it) and understand the fact that we have been deceived more that 100 times here.

The usual case is that, most fake inventors spent money asking for nothing in return in first glance but this is not so. The myth around their device, the attention they get, the "gury style" they assume and the blind followers they get is more than enough to get many resourceful man satisfying their twisted appetites!! True.

...

Last but now least, we are amateurs experimenters and stick to places such as this not by reason but form fetich. Also,
* Weasly group are not obliged to stick to rigorous scietific procedures, but eventually and constantly working upon this device, if true they will.
* A small output, some 40w etc is easily passed for under unity even though OU. Get with the same equipment an output of 1 or 10Kw and nothing more is to be questioned...
This is why i asked the yoke to be seen with same FGs at 1 Kw output.

Lastly, irrelevantly of what maybe told now, when the mood smile on us, we replicate due our fetich the device suggested. Truth always triumphs at the end.

[jbignes5]

@Verpie,

I can feel your frustration man. This forum is full of similar cases, that people claim the utmost unconventional thing yet they deny to do the very basic of power measurment. And if they do at last, and even present a selfrunner, almost noone can replicate.

By no means i do not want to be negatively biased towards every new proposal arriving here, but 99% that is the case.

Weastly group on the other hand, should show some understanding about everybody's eagerness to have a OU device at last since this will be a pshychologic milestone (apart from the usefulness of it) and understand the fact that we have been deceived more that 100 times here.

The usual case is that, most fake inventors spent money asking for nothing in return in first glance but this is not so. The myth around their device, the attention they get, the "gury style" they assume and the blind followers they get is more than enough to get many resourceful man satisfying their twisted appetites!! True.

...

Last but now least, we are amateurs experimenters and stick to places such as this not by reason but form fetich. Also,
* Weasly group are not obliged to stick to rigorous scietific procedures, but eventually and constantly working upon this device, if true they will.
* A small output, some 40w etc is easily passed for under unity even though OU. Get with the same equipment an output of 1 or 10Kw and nothing more is to be questioned...
This is why i asked the yoke to be seen with same FGs at 1 Kw output.

Lastly, irrelevantly of what maybe told now, when the mood smile on us, we replicate due our fetich the device suggested. Truth always triumphs at the end.

One thing I would like to mention is that fact that our measuring devices are not what true power is. If our understanding of the processes is flawed then the measuring device would negate any benefit to the measurement. This is the case in my other experiment. Although I can take measurements of my device it lower the output because the device was not made to measure true power (both halves). We are working  blindly because we don't have the tools to measure it correctly yet.


Here is an example.


My device is a crystal battery bank. Total power when measured is 3.2 volts dc and 5.8 volts ac. But when I connect the meter to the circuit which is a simple bridge rectifier and cap to led it dims the led. So all you out there with test equipment you are changing the way your device is working and the measurements are not accurate in any way. My crystal battery bank runs better without anything attached measuring wise. As soon as I connect the meter it dims the led and throws the device way out of balance. Besides we can use the work done to accurately asses the situation. watt meter could be used in all connection to the grid. If the grid was used.

My answer to the question is Work with what you got and get from the environment. It is what Niagara Falls was about. We chose not to generate high voltage and converted it directly before your outlet. This you must pay for twice. With High voltage generation you don't have a push back. Then all you need to do is convert where you want it to come out. This conversion is not payed for it is a pressure like device or passive device. We did it the wrong way and now we are paying for everything.

My ultimate goal would be to find a permanent source then tap that. The thinking behind that is collect form a very large area of space and focus it and generate from that. So I have several projects going.

[verpies]

I stopped off at the EE shop and got a few of the right one. Nice 0.68uF MKP style. I think I will remove the top part of the circuit and re-do it on a breadboard for now until this all works as planned.

If I were you I would get several different capacitances, because varying the C1 capacitance is the best way to change the oscillation frequency of the flyback driver circuit.

Please remember that the flyback driver circuit, I posted, is the simplest one I could think about. 
It is not the most flexible and reliable circuit. 
The TL494 driver suggested by MeggerMan has those desirable qualities but at the price of increased complexity.

For those interested in the push-pull circuit for the TL494...

...and you can make a plasma speaker out of it,  too

Regarding power measurements, maybe we should stop bombarding the WNY group and give them some room to breath. Discussing about power measurements will always be an issue. Once we have one device working ourselves, we will be in a position to do most all of that so for now, let's just get the design working.

Too bad. Now, the lack of valid power measurements makes me so wary of the whole Tube device that I feel discouraged from ever building it.  I bet many others do too. 
Inventor's continued opposition to publishing them makes it worse.  Publishing invalid input power measurements and insisting on their validity is even worse than no measurements at all.
Without those power measurements, the Tube device is nothing more but a fancy sparker to me.   I stopped being interested in sparklers when I was 11.

As I had mentioned, I am in a constant state of trying to reconcile all the variables. Now when you look at the diagram @T-1000 made a few weeks ago where he shows the pulse circuit, the flyback transformer and the output stage, we can see that the flyback has no internal diode but that's not all. In the diagram, we see three coils in the FBT, the primary, a multi tap secondary (MTS) and the HV output. He shows that the negative of the HV is going one end of the MTS and the other end of the MTS goes to the center tap of the output bucking coil (OBC). He also shows a capacitor that is tapped into the MTS that is probably acting like an internal energy pump. Now if all these factors are required so the FBT can produce the right type of HV output to the CC, then we are all in deep trouble from the start.

Yes, there are many variables and getting one of them wrong may cost the experimenter much more than 10h.

@wattsup
I think I did not reply to one of your past questions about the "wave riding on top".
It's be gnawing on me so I'd like to add that you can add the HF to LF waveform with a resistor summing network providing that its resistance is high. This is the electrical addition.  Magnetic addition, on the other hand, depends on mutual inductance and impedance of the windings fed with these two waveforms and in such case, reactance varies with frequency.

Impedance = Resistance + Reactance

[forest]

noise level is going up ..wonder what would be the next stimulation