Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[znel]

Check this one out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=ZpK30UIdiJ4


Super efficient transformer. But it was an led output. If we put an inductive reflector above the energy leak in this transformer it will increase the performance I bet. And trying a bifilar wound flat coil might be the ticket. You might get both sides of the flat coil as well. The 5 turn around the flat coil could be centered above and below the flat coil. Having flat coils that are self terminated or shorted would be excellent reflectors. Finding out the distance is going to be trial and error.

Impressive !   I've followed some of jiffycoil's work and have built quite a few flat coils and they are very impressive.   Notice hes only using around 100 turns of wire for the coil.    I had built a couple meyl/jackson towers for testing a year ago or so and was only using 50 and 80 turns with an output that was pretty spectacular for the input required.   I also set up a couple of these that were driven with the thomas/kacher circuit, these were also quite impressive.   

I started building helical coils of low turns to see what the difference would be and to be honest I don't see much difference as long as their done on large diameter forms.    The pancake coils take up less overall area to achieve the same results which makes them much more suitable for small devices although they still require some fairly large diameters depending on the wire used.   

@jimboot....  very nice work with the kacher !   If you use earth ground as a top load and connect the lamp to the neg terminal of the battery and use an arial of around 3ft long or a mass like an aluminum, copper or steel tube you should be able to light a bulb of higher wattage.    Your correct in finding the right bulb for the task, it's also a matter of matching the bulb resistance to the output of your device.    Tesla stated you can light a 100 watt bulb with 100 volts at 1 amp or with 1000 volts at .1 amp... I've also found the frequency to play an important part - to high and the bulb doesn't have time to produce light although it will still produce heat.    Getting the frequency low enough to maintain resonance and have time to excite the filiment seems to be the key.     It appears your well within the range without adding the ferrite.   Typically the ferrite isn't needed unless the coils are very low inductance such as a small diameter coil.   

I've also noted that the kacher responds to a higher frequency than the natural resonance of the coil.   It seems to operate on a harmonic quite a bit higher which isn't always the best for output.   You can pull this down using either ferrite or a large top load ( or earth ) to bring it down closer to it's natural.     As an example I calculated one of my coils should operate in the 3.3 Mhz range.   Driven by a kacher circuit it ran at 1.6 Mhz or 1/2 of its actual 1/4 wave for the length of wire as an antenna.     But looking at the coil with a spectrum analyzer I found some really high peaks in the lower bands and it performs exceedingly better at 105 khz.... go figure...

I've come to the conclusion that "resonance" as tesla stated isn't exactly the same resonance we are accustomed to using.   I started connecting coils to a spectrum analyzer and looking at all the harmonics generated by the coil.   Some of course are man made and weeding out the garbage is difficult but there is usually a very distict peak that the coil responds to in the lower range - it is a night and day difference in performance.   ( especially if it is to be earth grounded ). 

Another thing to keep in mind is that a well tuned tank circuit creates an infinate impedance and only requires from the input the amount of energy to cover losses and maintanance.   The kacher operates on self capacitance ( coils, wires, objects in close proximity etc ) so it's not always operating in a very efficient range and can be a real power hog.   Forming well tuned tanks in the circuit to control the way  it behaves is a huge bonus.   

[jbignes5]

This is a good set of tests for the pancake coil: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7AMLXoFO28&feature=related


The only thing I didn't see was the pancakes on either side of the transmitter and could be hooked in the bifilar wound method Tesla used for his special transformer. Each pancake would be wound but in opposite directions and shorted. This would cause a reactive shield on both sides of the xmit coil, causing huge currents to be formed as feed back from the transmitter coil.


In the traditional Tesla setup, With a diode shunt to load then ground any extra energy will be grounded through the load. So what we are doing is creating an energy channel from the environment and grounding it through a load via induction at will.


But how will this change our environment. Will it cause the atmosphere to loos so much charge that it becomes frozen? Devoid of energy? Or will it imbalance an already tiny limit and cause chaos to the flows that are natural?


Has anyone considered the surface area of the earth and then quantify the static portion of the energy it contains? How much can we push that imbalance before bad things happen? I think how Tesla did this and eventually thought about the types of energy we are dealing with made him change his mind about the direction of this flow and how even the littlest changes can make massive results elsewhere. This might be why he went back to work on a cyclic form of this technology not only to make it safer but make it truly non polluting and self contained.


Tesla also used custom capacitors filled with oil to make the dielectric massive. This is what allowed him to charge them to a massive 44k volts then instantly discharge them like a bullet into these coils. Putting an antenna in the secondary allowed Tesla to draw in more charges and really didn't put it out till the device was stopped. It pressurized in a way.


With a dual pancake reflector array this would make a spongy like Ultra capacitor on either side. What we night need to do is sniff the field around these pancake coils. If they are like I am thinking then they look like our solar system. Flat and bulged in the middle. Heh you could say Flying saucer like even lol. This array would create an inductive bottle and allow Huge amounts of energy to be compressed there. Shooting a capacitance discharge into the transmitter coil would create one hell of a rebound. With only the resistance of the wire as the only limiting factor of these coils making parallel coils and making them symmetrical to each other would halve their resistance to the point that it wouldn't matter and be near zero. At that point the coil would only be capacitance and work much like any capacitor. You could disconnect the coil and use it elsewhere if need be. No problem because the energy will contain itself by reflection.

I believe this is the same process we use with laser stimulation in a crystal.

[garrypm]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEh7B63i_SI

Kurt's effort

[baroutologos]

I've also noted that the kacher responds to a higher frequency than the natural resonance of the coil.   It seems to operate on a harmonic quite a bit higher which isn't always the best for output.   You can pull this down using either ferrite or a large top load ( or earth ) to bring it down closer to it's natural.     As an example I calculated one of my coils should operate in the 3.3 Mhz range.   Driven by a kacher circuit it ran at 1.6 Mhz or 1/2 of its actual 1/4 wave for the length of wire as an antenna.     But looking at the coil with a spectrum analyzer I found some really high peaks in the lower bands and it performs exceedingly better at 105 khz.... go figure...

..Another thing to keep in mind is that a well tuned tank circuit creates an infinate impedance and only requires from the input the amount of energy to cover losses and maintanance.   The kacher operates on self capacitance ( coils, wires, objects in close proximity etc ) so it's not always operating in a very efficient range and can be a real power hog.   Forming well tuned tanks in the circuit to control the way  it behaves is a huge bonus.

My lately build Kachers all are operating normally on their bulk LC resonance.
But, in this case http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxp6wrh2Pqo (after enforcing a voltage node on toplead) it seems to operate at a frequency dictated by L/2 wavelength. Of course this changes by ferrite addition, but it does not seem as a harmonic of LC either since especially the C component can be altered without frequency alteration.

I've come to the conclusion that "resonance" as tesla stated isn't exactly the same resonance we are accustomed to using.   I started connecting coils to a spectrum analyzer and looking at all the harmonics generated by the coil.   Some of course are man made and weeding out the garbage is difficult but there is usually a very distict peak that the coil responds to in the lower range - it is a night and day difference in performance.   ( especially if it is to be earth grounded ). 

I am interested in exploring this view. Can you demonstrate the principle?

[znel]

Here are just a couple variations with energy gain, the first one was done with 2 identical transformers working out of phase with each other driving a CFL on the output - very very low frequency.  The second is an interesting kacher circuit tuned to restrain resonance and only the accumulation is removed at the intervals.   The last is a similar circuit running at a higher frequency.   

These are all variations of the circuit I posted earlier with the exception of the twin toroid transformers which was driven by a FG.

Lets use an analogy of a rubber ball - you lift it to a certain height and drop it,  it will continue to bounce until all the energy has disipated.    Lets say the rubber ball is 80% efficient and you lift the ball to a height of 10ft and drop it, first bounce is 8ft, second is 6.4, third is 5.12, forth is 4.09 and so on.   If it continues on it will have raised itself about 30ft after 10 bounces or 3 x that of which it started.  Storing and recycling it's energy.    What if after the first installment of energy you only use the 20% losses with a little bit more energy ( say 25% total ) and tap the ball at it's peak.... each tap would become additive and accumulative.    This is what I believe tesla called an "activity" in excess of it's input.   You can extract only an amount equal to it's natural accumulation otherwise you have to include the initial energy installed originally.   This would be the case in a ring down and in a solid wave - you need to put the intital "new" energy back in the system all the time ( wasteful ).   

I don't believe this to be overunity on its own.   At the point you can extract from the environment the losses and some additional energies to keep tapping the ball to maintain the accumulation is when it becomes self sufficient.   I don't believe in "overunity" as the word might imply - the energy comes from somewhere.   Overunity states the ignorance of where the energy is coming from.   If we didn't understand that the wind was pushing a windmill then we have an overunity device.   Once we have an understanding then it's no longer overunity, we simply don't have to "pay" for the input because it comes from a natural supply.