Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 506 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Ghazanfar_Ali on January 18, 2012, 12:31:58 PM
I am attaching the schematic with wattmeter connected at the output stage across 150Ohms load. The average Wattage is around 42 W. Is this one correct now? This wattmeter of multisim calculates both for AC and DC signals.

We still do not know if this Wattmeter is good for non-sinusoidal (arbitrary) waveforms. 
The field "Power Factor" that appears on this Wattmeter suggests that this meter is suitable only for measuring sinusoidal waveforms.  Outside of that, the "power factor" concept does not make much sense.

For sinusoidal waveforms it is true that:
V_rms * I_rms * PowerFactor = Average Power.

For all waveforms only the following is true:
AVG(V_inst * I_inst) = Average Power.

I strongly suspect that this wattmeter is of the former kind.

There are simple tests that you can perform with high crest factor waveforms, that will determine whether this Wattmeter blindly assumes sinusoidal waveforms or can work with all waveforms (arbitrary waveforms).  ...or just read the manual about its internals ;)
Also, if your simulation software has analog multipliers in its library then you can build your own trustworthy Wattmeter. 

wattsup

@stivep

OMG, why did I  not think about the spark plug resistor before. I have been trying to force feed that bulb through that damn resistor. So I will make a second spark gap ASAP cause this is getting really fun.

My first spark gap material is made of bronze from a welding rod and it gives one a very good snap. I will make the next one one in copper since it will not be handling as much voltage as the first.

OMG again. Just by going through this exercise, I realized something. SPARK GAP (SG) NOISE. The second SG made very little noise, almost silent. Is it possible that the TK Green Box (GB) visible open air spark gap is the second of two, of which the first is in the GB not only because of the higher voltage needing to be protected from any inadvertent shock but also to mute out the spark sound because his second spark (the visible one) did not make any special sound that we hear in the video. I wonder if anyone can do a spectrum analysis of the GB video when the camera is right beside the GB while it is sparking away.

So see these images. First one is one of the TK guys putting his hand almost onto the spark to darken the area and see it better. But look his hand is right there. If this was very high voltage, you would never want to do that. I know first hand (pun intended). Ouch. The second and third images show the TK GB spark and gap. The gap is very small. The material is copper. The sound is almost non-existent (but a spectrum analysis here would be precious).

But this convinces me even more that the WNYg is on the right track.

wattsup


ronotte

@wattsup
I do not know if this could help but in my case I used as SG1 two brass screws  (10mm diam each): the noise coming from the 1mm gap quite high as also the ozone generation. Overall behaviour quite good in the sense that I had enough power/voltage to fire SG2 (SparkGap: 1KV lightning arrestor). Then I changed SG1 to a 1KV arrestor: behaviour almost (?) the same but of course no noise or ozone at all as the unit sealed. I tried also a westinghouse unit (quite big glass bulb under vacuum) rated at least 600V but having big electrodes ...to deal with power (I think unit used for protecting big radar antennas...I bought 10 pieces years ago on ebay), well in that case behavior poor as not enough power to fire SG2: I think too low firing voltage. So, you see that the SG plays a fundamental role...do not forget that firing repetition rate is also dependent on the gap length and HV source used.

@stivep
I am now striving to devise a way to use the output produced by my unit: until now I haven't found a clever way...so I am looking at the very interesting work done by stivep on that subject. In my case the single lamp load presents a too high load that dampens heavily the output  very short (200-300nsec) HV spikes developed by SG2 1KV arrestor firing. Spikes amplitude are between 1KV and 2KV while repetition rate ranges from 10msec to 0.5msec depending on various setting variables.

Roberto

rensseak


SG = What? signal generator?
Please, if you use a short term for spark gap then better Sgap or something esle.

duff

The following audio clip and analysis was taken from the garden video, during a time when the camera was focused on the sparkgap and no one was talking.

Note the wide band width between dark areas.

For comparison I will post, as the last image, the spectrum of my sparkgap. Note how narrow the bandwidth is on mine.

Perhaps some of the engineers will be better able to decode these.
At the moment all I can say is that my gap noise does not look like Kapanadze's gap noise.
So the question is, what is Kapandaze doing to produce that spectrum?

The first two analysis were done using baudline.
It has a lot of functionality, is opensource and available for Linux, Mac & Solaris.
Following are the parameters used for the analysis.
Quote
baudline -transform autocorrelation -space agc -channels 1 -fftsize 65536 -basefrequency 1 -samplerate 44100

The third analysis was done using Ardour.
My audio clip was made using Ardour and a Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone.

[/pre]