Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[sparks]

from what source did you get this from?
please share a link to it..
Thank you

Link is here.  http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1904-03-05.htm
Tesla is not claiming energy from no where.  I believe his wireless transmission of power system would be producing standing waves.  The maximum wave activity could be millions of horsepower but the power drawn could never exceed the generator capacity.  The prime mover in the Wardenclyffe tower was a steam driven generator.  His analogy to the Earth being a water filled sphere.  His tower a piston pump and his receivers little piston motors.  As long as the little motors pistons are lifted without doing any work they fall back and pump water back to the tower pump.  This pressure is felt by the tower pump and the primemover feels no load conditions.  Now load the piston motor.  The piston at the transmitter feels this pressure.  That wave is damped.  Load all the little motors to the working capacity of the pump.  Those little motors arent going to move unless enough water is pumped from the transmitter to overcome the load.
   This was still a brilliant and worthy endeavour.  No fuel to lug around.  How much energy is wasted just delivering fuel to engines.  Lugging around 15 gallons of fuel in millions of vehicles never mind tankers, refineries, mining equipment you name it.  Solar radiation UV visible ir say 1hp per meter.  1 Square kilometer.  1 million horsepower.  Sun appears to be shining on some desert somewhere all the time.  Hell some tank farms are 1 square kilometer.  The alaskan pipeline alone could be collecting a couple of megawatts.
   

[cheappower2012]

Hi all,in my view,TK is lying about the device needing a ground ,however it is needed to at least provide a theory of why it appears that current is coming from the ground.Current coming from a ground wire in the manner of the TK video's is impossible,in my opinion.So I did a few experiments,in the greenbox video,ac voltage readings were impossible to read,if pulses from the induced first coil are mixed with ac current source you have this effect.The type of clamp amp meter,used in the video's I believe plays a part in false current amp readings,I have a meter that is close to the meter in the video's that's used in the experiments along with a different meter that doesn't react to current errors.A point on the ac voltage reading,all digital voltmeters
will have an error reading the ac voltage under the same conditions of  induced
pulses.On the frequency measured in the greenbox video that's inconclusive,I did another experiment,the meter will read the pulse frequency not the line frequency
this should apply to the greenbox video.A video shows that when a current source is removed,a false reading on the current meter disappears,then reappears when the current source reappears,reinforcing the belief that current thru the bulb is related to the ground current reading.

[verpies]

A few days ago I posted the message below.

There is an interesting update in PJKBook on the Kapanadze coil on page 3-107:
http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter3.pdf
"The main secret of the Kapanadze coil is the conductive ring placed within the coil.  This is in contradiction to standard thinking; a closed conductive ring in a coil would normally create a wasteful shunt rather than be a source of energy. It is hard to believe that this piece of physics has been known at least since Meyer's experiments (around 1975) but it is speculated that Tesla and later Hubbard knew this as well."

The more I read this article, the more I understand it, the more I think that Bill has it right. Bill’s approach is physics based. This article is going to break the deadlock. Read it again and again, both parts. It is really worth it. I like the second coil in particular.
yfree

Do you think the posters on this forum are in a deadlock?  What is the advantage of the physics based approach over what we have now?

Why do you agree with William J. McFreey that cyclotron orbit established via Lorentz deflection can be maintained in a solid object? 
Is it possible for fast moving charged particles to exist in solid objects, in which the space between densly packed nuclei (see Bremsstrahlung loss) is filled with dense electron clouds (see Møller scattering)?
Can the multiplication of fast moving charged particles occur in a solid object?
Do you think that Beta decay really can be stimulated in a solid object by NMR?

[scratchrobot]

Hi,
Text in the Tesla document Tariel K. holding in the hand at the end of “green box” demonstration:
*******************************************************************************
I have been asked by the ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTER to be quite explicit on this subject so that my young friends among the readers of the magazine will clearly understand the construction and operation of my "Magnifying Transmitter" and the purposes for which it is intended. Well, then, in the first place, it is a resonant transformer with a secondary in which the parts, charged to a high potential, are of considerable area and arranged in space along ideal enveloping surfaces of very large radii of curvature, and at proper distances from one another thereby insuring a small electric surface density everywhere so that no leak can occur even if the conductor is bare. It is suitable for any frequency, from a few to many thousands of cycles per second, and can be used in the production of currents of tremendous volume and moderate pressure, or of smaller amperage and immense electromotive force. The maximum electric tension is merely dependent on the curvature of the surfaces on which the charged elements are situated and the area of the latter.
"Judging from my past experience, as much as 100,000,000 volts are perfectly practicable. On the other hand currents of many thousands of amperes may be obtained in the antenna. A plant of but very moderate dimensions is required for such performances. Theoretically, a terminal of less than 90 feet in diameter is sufficient to develop an electromotive force of that magnitude while for antenna currents of from 2,000-4,000 amperes at the usual frequencies it need not be larger than 30 feet in diameter. (TK scaled down to 100kW and 5kW)
********************************************************************************
Ps. Tesla mention earlier in the document that it was not thin wire secondary and it was not many turns not close wounded.

Since we entering a circle from the beginning one more time I would like to share some good historical documentation (apologize to those which studded this long time ago)

http://www.kathodos.com/teslasaid.pdf

Download link seams very slow but is worth waiting if you did not read it before, at least little bit from page 46

Xd.

Thank you for the translation and document 

[T-1000]

I still haven't gotten a direct answer to my question and pt.8 still remains unclarified

Also, what is your physical evidence that the NMR phenomenon or Fe isotope transmutation was even happening in the Yoke device ?   Contents of third-party patents do not constitute such evidence and alternative explanations also exist.

If you do not wish to sit down and just make own exeriment I canot help you. You have enough of clues what to look for and what to expect. It all comes down to simple practice instead of complex theory...
Please read http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/msg320958/#msg320958 once again if you wish to actually reproduce effect in your lab.