Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 523 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: yfree on June 11, 2012, 12:11:51 PM
This can only mean that Zeitmaschine "hat den Artikel überhaupt nicht gelesen". :)
Doch hat er, at least twice. But since McFreey has only principles to offer instead of working devices, these principles are most likely wrong.

There is no proof the Kapanadze device works with ferrite and there is no proof any ferrite device works at all.

Please allow me the following question: If the Kapanadze device uses a ferrite/magnetic core (as depicted in the McFreey drawing below) then where is this ferrite core located in the large devices (see TMZ images)? Is it located within the coil of approx. the height of two meters (yellow tent) and the diameter of approx. one third of a meter? This would be a lot of ferrite, wouldn't it? (and for sure not available in this size at the next radio dealer)

The shunt-theory seems to be wrong also. To me this blue rod looks rather like a simple lightning arrester.

So keep on making mistakes, maybe someday one mistake is actually going to work. :D

Now, what's next? Perhaps constructing something easy like an »anti-gravity coil«?

http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=anti+gravity+coil

With a little bit of (bad) luck it will produce free energy instead of free anti-gravity.

Regards

P.S.: And yes, closely observed the silver TMZ coils looking like a coil in a coil, wound with flat wire (just as in the tent) and therefore most likely in bifilar design. What could this mean?

yfree

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on June 11, 2012, 08:00:31 PM
Doch hat er, at least twice. But since McFreey has only principles to offer instead of working devices, these principles are most likely wrong.
...
I am sorry, I did not expect this lengthy a reply. Besides, I did not know Zeitmaschine had a working device to offer. :)
I cannot speak for McFreey, but I could not find anywhere in his article a shunt theory as depicted in your response. He only talks of a shunt as created by the disk or ring, placed within the coil, as can be seen in Fig.1 (yellow coloured). Magnetic core does not mean ferrite only, it can be iron foil, for instance, and there is plenty of space under these windings for this.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

verpies

Without credible power measurements or an independently replicated/verified self-runner we can't be sure of a "working device" - videos are not enough (see my TPU deception in previous message)
Nontheless McFreey's analysis is the only analysis making sense, that I have seen so far.
Ferromagnetism and beta/delta rays stimulated emission and magnetic confinement in solid matter are unexplored and promising phenomena.
Contrastingly, coreless quarter wave helical resonators are old news and have been beaten to death already.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: yfree on June 11, 2012, 11:06:27 PM
I cannot speak for McFreey, but I could not find anywhere in his article a shunt theory as depicted in your response
Shunt theory is on p. 461 PJKbook version 21.4 (very voluminous to keep people busy), author unclear, think Patrick J. Kelly.

But now, since my device is not working (yet), it is time for some considerations:

1) Initially Kapanadze tries to build an anti-gravity device
2) Instead of anti-gravity he suddenly gets free energy
3) This means the 2004 coil is not optimized for producing energy
4) There is no guarantee the 2004 orange wire is not bifilar too
5) TMZ modifies the coil(s) for easy (and big) construction and maximum energy output
6) Result is a coil placed within another coil, maybe both bifilar
7) All coils are plain single layer

Putting this together: Wind two coils with bifilar wire, single layer and different tube diameters. Put one coil into the other coil. Or: Wind both bifilar wires on one tube, each single layer. Surround this with an exciter coil.

What do we have: A Tesla coil with two secondaries, each of them bifilar.

Regrettably I have no idea (yet) how to connect this (and to what), but at least winding such coils should not cause much trouble.

Regards

jbignes5

 The inner is a bifilar but it is for the grounds. It is what gives the ground polarity and a direction of flow. It is the valve basically. It controls the direction via direction of turn vs polarity and direction of the blast released into the coils from the heavy exciter coil. So you get a very intense pulse from a heavy mass copper coil into a Tesla coil type semi bifilar coil. I say semi because the return coil is only partly wound. This makes it respond only to part of the polarity of the blast with the excess going to ground. This causes an uneven ground loop to form and when that happens it is like hooking a paddle wheel to Niagra falls. Huge amounts of current get developed from that loop. Even small loops can create massive currents. As long as you can keep the valve open the unit will run in reverse then, sucking anything it needs from the ground loop currents.


You have to be very careful of these currents they are extremely powerful in some situations.


Curiously this is the same thing we are attempting to do in the crystal battery. The process is the very same process in both applications as far as using a bond of two different metals (iron, water pipe) and aluminum radiator. There will be a measurable power and can have a measurable current. These ground loops are very very powerful. So experiment at your own risk.