Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

There is no mixing of frequencies.
Most important thing is to generate sharp pulses (triggered) the pulse from Tesla coil need to be sharp "This may be good example: electric gas igniter"! This is the only source who generate impulses. this is the only generator there! No mixing and no modulations.

Let's assume for a moment this is the truth. Then that means Kapanadze uses all two (visible) transistors for the creation of high voltage with high frequency. Furthermore the »49 and« reading of the frequency meter must show the frequency created by the inverter itself (the light blue box). But because of that the question arises, what causes the observed switch off delay? Permittivity of space itself perhaps?

Regards

[forest]

Let's assume for a moment this is the truth. Then that means Kapanadze uses all two (visible) transistors for the creation of high voltage with high frequency. Furthermore the »49 and« reading of the frequency meter must show the frequency created by the inverter itself (the light blue box). But because of that the question arises, what causes the observed switch off delay? Permittivity of space itself perhaps?

Regards

Good question. It is the same effect as observed with motors. I can't remember now how it is called but the subsequent starts of motor require much less energy input then with "cold one", pressuming that between each running periods did not pass more then a few minutes (or seconds?, sorry can't recall exactly). Surely something is spinning along the big motor. Some scientists try to explain it with remnant magnetic field in armature.
For me it is clear that's the same effect like big bell still producing sound a minute after being hit but hammer.

[jbignes5]

 I think you guys are getting there. I made this connection a long time ago. I noticed this event happen more and more and couldn't figure out what was going on. It seemed that there was an inertia built up in a kind of super flow within the device. This super flow could take up to 1 day to loose a good portion of the inertia provided by the powering of the device.
Now that I have researched ground loops it seems to me to be the mechanism that powers OU like devices. By including different portions of environment and device it allowed for a better interface to the super flow we were creating. Bedini did this with his energizing energy. Once the energy backflowed into the battery it opens up the resistive component and a super flow gets created from this energy. This was why you would see the batteries charging for hours after being exposed to this form energy. It biased the natural values of the metals and made resistance futile or non existent.


In my real opinion I think it biases the standing voltage of every atom in the device. This expands the distance in between every atom by an amount and in effect lowering the resistance. Also the type of energy this was didn't respond like normal resistances do. Since there was little current there was nothing to impede the flow of this energy and hence the super loops form and spin away for hours. Since this energy has little current it does not have the same effects on resistances. No conversion of energy to heat in fact it might suck in heat to fill in the vacuum that is being made by the nil current voltage loops. So you couldn't detect it flowing in the loop unless you disconnected that loop. The PMH is such a loop. If you look at the PMH you will understand how a charge of the system coils recycle a bidirectional transfer to a unidirectional super flow in the PMH.
The PMH uses the bifilar polar wind to operate and is partly based on Tesla designs. The transformer that Tesla patented could be made with a bifilar polar wind and thats what Ed used except that he shorted the drive coils and energized them when needed in a half version of Tesla transformer. It was an experiment that told Ed much about super flows and how powerful they can become.


You could think of it as a fly wheel that stored the energy in the inertia of the super loop. Tapping it at the right time will add more inertia to the loops which could take days to run it's course. And Tesla learned that in the right conditions you could excite the loops into runaway mode and harvest as much of the energy of the excited loop as you wanted. ! tap in this case would last minutes with the right harvesting and seconds if you harvested most of the excitation but left the super loop at it's base level.


So what we need to do is create a loop, excite the loop into runaway and then collect the additional inertia for our own use without depleting the base loops inertia.


I am thinking the loops can be created in anything that conducts and most electronics try to defeat that loops power by supplying more energy (waste) to control that loop. Which by all accounts in our literature they want to avoid. They say they are harmless but I have my doubts since they talk about 1000's of amps flowing in these loops. There must be a way to harness these loops. One way is through mid field induction and another is to create the same flow in a pair of coils (bifilar) to the grounds. This will cause a inductive loop and if we then wrap another coil over that inductive loop you get a small current flow. Now energize that inductive loop and it will super flow causing a great amount of current to pass between the coils of the grounds and the overlapped coil around it.


What the field does is provide complete conduction paths through metals that bypasses resistance and allows the current loop to super flow, even across inductive areas.

Ok I found the 2004 video and boy you can hear the ground loop at the end.. The 60 hz humm is obvious when he initiates the ground loop. He then lets it ramp up then disconnects the second ground from the table plug outlet to the inverter.

This video shows the device quite clear and all the components involved: The metal can is just a switch to turn the load on but it has to be shielded or you will get zapped. There is also a step down transformer and diode bridge to turn it into usable dc for looping back to the battery.

It seems to me that I was partially right but you need to look at all the components. Battery/inverter 2 separate grounds(from outside to table ground), the unit itself, then an additional transformer/bridge for battery looping from the output.

When I see the device this time after viewing the video I must change my mind yet again about the operatrion. The inverter is connected to the ground and through the device coils to the switch back into the device to the load coil then out to one side of the output. The other side is from the ground to the other output. The inverter hot wire is connected to the spark gap and into a not terminated coil or exciter.

I am gonna watch this till I get it right.

http://www.magistrala.cz/freeenergy/2012/02/17/kapanadze-28th-april-2004-full-version-free-energy-device/

[Zeitmaschine]

Today I'm trying to think profoundly simple:

Could it be that the TMZ setup in the yellow tent is made with coils out of quadfilar wire? If so, then the two coils in the obscure patent specifications (which are looking suspiciously bifilar) are combined to one quadfilar coil.

Question: Why is there obviously no exciter coil drawn on the patent? The exciter coil in the tent setup could be hidden in the base of each of the three coils - or it could be not. Next question: What happens when high voltage pulses are being applied not to an external exciter coil but to one wire of the quadfilar coil itself (if strength of insulation allows)?

Thus obtain a lot of quadfilar cable, wrap it around an old cardboard tube, connect it the right way to high and low voltage, receive free energy en masse. 


Regards

[stivep]

Wesley's original question:

How you want to deal with  impedance matching?
1. caduceus with spark?
2. yoke without spark2a. yoke with spark?
3. inductive load of coil circuitry of TK projects?

Verpies response:

The way I do it for VCVS amp is to use predistortion with AWG and low output impedance transistors in Half-bridge push-pull configuration for the output driver operating in the G, H, B or AB class - the predistortion cancels all of the non-linearities of the transistors and the cross-over distortion of the half-bridge.

I keep the source resistance as close to zero according to the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.

The above allows me to drive large HF currents with good linearity of of the VCVS amplifier so constructed.  The limit of the output voltage is 1200Vp-p, but that's much higher than the voltage in industrial power lines, anyway.  If I need higher voltages, I use a RF step-up transformer and/or LC resonant rise. For higher current I use step-down transformers as well (e.g. for the 1turn winding in the Yoke device) 

Of course any use of the transformer precludes DC components in the output signal. If  DC component is needed above 1200V, the solution is a DC power source in series with the output of such amplifier.

It's difficult for me to answer the rest of your questions because I do not understand the input requirements of the devices descriped in pt.1 and pt.3.  Why is HV needed at their input anyway? 
I haven't studied these devices in detail because I find them unremarkable just like resonant transformers.

Wesley's response:

Please post  practical schematic and/or build practical device and test it.
I will give it to analysis to scientific team.
Task to achieve:
1.  able to produce 10 000V sine wave with linear wavelength at chosen by you frequency range but not lower than 20khz  up to 2 MHz when load is spark gap and 100W light bulb


1a.able to produce 10 000V sine wave with linear wavelength at chosen by you frequency range but not lower than 20khz  up to 2 MHz when load is park gap and capacitor made out of two coils  when 100W light bulb is connected to second one (Air coupling.)

If power of 100W is not achievable than  please  state the max available power of the circuit.I might be able to challenge you with 1KW output and more no only 100W
Ohhhhhh... how m' I going to do that............ hmmmmmmmmmmmm  


problems to solve:
a.changing impedance due to spark properties
b.changing impedance due to spark properties and Capacitive Reactance of capacitive character of coil capacitor(made of 2 flat wire coils diameter  10cm W x 150cm L)
c. in  a and b scenario BEMF or VSWR impact must be taken to consideration
IF YOU CANNOT DO IT than  I CAN DO IT period!!!
So let's see what you can do .

Question :
2. How you build transformer based on ferrite core that will give you  no distortion and close to  100%  linearity in  shape wave   versus out shape wave. in the region of mentioned frequency range 20khz to 2MHz
If it is to hard for you than please just  give the highest upper frequency RANGE OF SUCH TRANSFORMER YOU ARE ABLE TO PRODUCE. I will match it with my design or admit that I'm not able to do so

again

IF YOU CANNOT DO IT than  I CAN DO IT period!!!
So let's see what you can do .
And yet deliver all of mathematical  calculation formulas  for anyone to be able to design transformer of his choice based on it.( in given frequency range)
 
Lets than see what you can do first.


Wesley




PS: yet I might be able to prove you that such one works in practical measurement prove at no doubt
I would love  you to be able to  prove me yours the same way.
for all others not really familiar with subject  I explain.
At primary of transformer made out of ferrite core we are giving say 400kHz square and we have 400kHz square no distortion at output or insignificant minor distortion if any.
Than we go to 20kHz and we repeat  it as well, so is other frequencies of chosen bandwidth.


The same test will be done  with
ramp
Triangle
sine
or any custom  design wave shape including unlimited length of burst  made of different custom made modules of any shape imaginable.