Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 669 Guests are viewing this topic.

frantz

Quote from: a.king21 on August 10, 2012, 07:31:56 PM
Tesla did an experiment in the late 19th century. He took a small device with a stethoscope feedback and attached it to a skyscraper 100 metres high by
......
Intelligent constructive comments welcome.


Hi,
1. could you explain hows looks frequency mixing inside this theory? How should looks output signal without second filter? like modulated few kHz by 50Hz? if yes, where is demodulator?
2. the coil 8 should close loop of amplified current...?
3. hows looks magnetic connections between coils 7,8,9 ? if is present.
4. freq. adjuster (11) is next generator (50Hz)?
5. how small should to be SG or how high should be voltage for SG to see spark? And why TK is using HV wires to SG? SG have around 2 - 3 mm, this is aroud 6 - 9 KV...???

I can't to understand hows work coil 9 in this theory... sorry.


Regards

stivep

what happens with transformer when is in resonance?
Do we or we do not have BEMF? :)
and than saturation of the core is  our problem  but not when we use significantly low power.


see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9UKBEEKx4w
from minute 30:41
but that is just the  prove of concept (I have been  experimenting with flyback not with regular transformer.)
(You have to do it by yourself to see it with regular transformer.)


how how how......
The Abramienko fork with the spark in my experiment and NYW experiment ,acted also , as interrupter that is not letting transformer to burn........
Safety future....
Was that safety future in bed  video... ?
It was said that spark was not active for the short time and device  prolonged to work..
Yes it could.
If the spark is only the safety  future it will work   till temperature rises ( like smoke in aquarium and smoke in  TK motor presentation.)
So when transformer is in saturation mode it should burn in the matter of 1 minute.
But if interrupter is connected than it is not...
It is like me instead of holding up my 100 lb wife.( I would get tired)
I can pick her up and drop her,  pick her up and drop her,  pick her up and drop her,
So I can  have  breath.
got it?



Than when you look at Glen's transformer that is also not regular transformer  but it is on regular transformer core and has primary and secondary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrRc-xieWjE
the most important part is minute L 20:40



Let me to be crazy for the moment
Why not
I'm only 56
Sound? ??? ??



If sound  is to be in the picture than sound of transformer? immediate connection is  pressure wave ( LW)
I remember  yoke ferrite started to make funny vibration during experiment.
Was the sound to be as......>> vibration of air particle
a link to outside of transformer world?
and than somehow looped  to transformer back?
Was that that in nuclear structure of the air particles that  was any interaction of  sub sonic say microwave frequency?


If we looking for potential  interaction of TK device with something there  might be one of approaches to look at.




Logically: if there is  laws of  thermodynamic to be obeyed than
facts:
1. energy must be delivered
2 energy must be dissipated under load.
3 energy losses will contribute to total dissipation
4. additional outside energy must become involved by means of
a. resonance
b. physical delivery ( wire,- excluded)
                           ( wireless? only if it is  resonance circuit of transversal wave)
                           ( longitudinal wave.. is pressure wave)
let me desiderate on longitudinal wave)
if LW is to be  pure pressure wave  than it must be mechanical in its properties.
Than something must act as membrane and that something must act as mechanical to electric or.........
wow........
mechanical to magnetic flux changing transponder.
If membrane is to act AS SOMETHING THAT INTERACTS WITH MAGNETIC FLUX AS
MAGNETIC FLUX DISTURBING DEVICE.
At that point we have loop   of transformer to ambient and ambient to magnetic field and by such  magnetic acting as electrical change within the primary of transformer...
Was that the role of can in TK "bed" presentation?


If so than it might  explain "ether" involvement in this phenomena.


Membrane alters magnetic field by that  creating electric part of electromagnetic field to change.
Is that so simple? ??? ??? ?
Mr King........ is it?

No matter how we take it:
Please understand that:


So far, that is the only explanation that obey laws of conservation  of energy on this forum I think.





Wesley


























Wesley

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: a.king21 on August 10, 2012, 07:06:08 PM
Wattsup, for the umpteenth time: the spark gap is not necessary. It acts like a cheap overload protector. It's in parallel with the output load. It is even in his damn patent.
How does it come that the spark gap in tin can and green box video behaves totally different form spark gap in aquarium II video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4L0w56pa60

In 2004 video the spark is high frequency without any audible noise, in 2012 video the spark is clearly low frequency around 5Hz. Seems as if the spark is created by an entirely different high voltage system.

Could this be the system difference between patent #1 and patent #2?

Besides a spark gap parallel with the load means the connected heater would get around 2000 to 3000 volts in the time between each spark. And if the heater were a lamp this lamp would flicker with the frequency of the spark. How can this be?

frantz


cheappower2012

Zeitmaschine,its magic,you see a ball of wire and see a possible overunity,I
see that same ball of wire and see a ball of wire that's all.A.king21 sees two spark plugs and sees an overload circuit,I see the same thing and see a trick by a pathological liar.He sees a method of replicating the device from the patients,I see the patients the product of a pathological liar and worthless,its a matter of perception.