Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[itsu]

I thought that was the transformer for Tr1; the text in the same block relates to the KT926  (it's on the overall schematic)....


I may be way off, but 7mm is a lot smaller than that toroid which is as wide as two pots .... (although I might by the turn ratio of 3 and 70)

Yes d3x0r, you are right,  forget about the mentioned toroid.  It would be more like 4cm od, but the windings/turns could be accurate.

I have editted the original post to read toroid probably 4cm od.

By the way, i found the missing diagram, its on this webside:
http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/1226/dally1.GIF

The Russian text in the middle is to my understanding the data on the TP

Itsu

[itsu]

.

[starcruiser]

@verpies, if you look at the schematic shown above the B+ rails are at 150v dc, the pulsing circuit uses a 2:1 step up transformer which feeds the coax transmission line, thus the output would be around 500V

[jbignes5]

I am writing about the reality of creating 10kV sub-nanosecond pulses with transformers, transistors, diodes, spark-gaps, thyratrons, sprytrons, krytrons, etc...

My browser is set to filter-out jbignes' posts.
Last time I checked, this thread was preoccupied with Dally's device and Itsu's replication of it.
The aforementioned device is using sub-nanosecond pulses.

You know I couldn't care less what you have your browser set to. The simple fact of the matter is your a school taught magnetics man. You will never find overunity in the magnetic field. Period. How many times do you have to see this to believe it? Over and over they slowly push us guys to try the magnetic portion knowing full well it is very lossy and could never facilitate overunity. But on the other hand those who have stayed away from magnetic field on the whole show unity+.


This is the problem. Don't let people like verpies push you in the wrong direction. Magnetics will never get you there. In fact Tesla talked about that specifically. It was only in the electric field is there a possibility of finding what we seek. Yes, you can have magentics in the system but it must be contained and in that process can in fact generate more electric field in the process. Learning how to do this without listening to these preachers of the magnetic realm is the hardest part.


I'm not saying verpies is not well versed in the field he chooses (magnetic), what I am saying is that it has been beaten to death and will never show overunity. On the other hand very few are well versed in the electric field. It was and is still shunned and no one seems to get it really. We need to start learning about this electric field. Ignoring it's capabilities and making it a novelty has hidden it's secrets for far too long.


As to the capabilities of higher voltages switching faster I do believe in that 100%. I have seen it in all transistors without the associated heating problems as well. When you take the heavy current out of the equation, it of course can and will switch faster.


And I do not think this is outside of the scope of what TK did. The reason no one can replicate his method is simply for the fact that they are approaching it from the wrong field and will not look at it from the conversion of the electric field to the magnetic. It is a transformer and should be applied as such. Tesla called his motor a converter. This wasn't because it converted into motion. It was because it converted one field into another. In that conversion it grew in multiples because there is a vast more of the electric field in the background then there is of the magnetic field. Tesla's method was to convert inside of the unit on the fly so to speak so that the losses were very small. Even when talking about his method he was quoted to say that he used 95% electric field and 5% was wasted magnetic field. Now why is that?


This was his whole debate as well on disproving Hertzian waves.


[size=78%]http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1919-05-00.htm[/size]


This link talks about how hertzian waves are a fallacy. Now why would Tesla call it like that? He never believed that magnetic waves had anything to do with transmissions in communications and that the hertz system was mostly lossy and a waste of energy. He knew the electric field had way more reach and as little of it that the hertz system had it was the main contributor to the capability of distance in the hertz system.


We need to start listening to the one person who knew more about the electric field then any other human being. We need to learn what Tesla learned and further his experiments to get a better understanding of the principles of that method. Almost all system that have shown unity+ are based on the electric field. Look at Bedini, Don Smith, Dr. Stiffler and the Slayer exciter plus many many others who have figured this out and used it in systems to gain more then they inputted.


Ignore me if you will but approaching this in a magnetic sense will get you no where at all.

[dorcky]

Yes d3x0r, you are right,  forget about the mentioned toroid.  It would be more like 4cm od, but the windings/turns could be accurate.

I have editted the original post to read toroid probably 4cm od.

By the way, i found the missing diagram, its on this webside:
http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/1226/dally1.GIF

The Russian text in the middle is to my understanding the data on the TP

Itsu

Hello Itsu!

This is the schematic that I was looking for... Ask for it on your youtube channel Thanks for sharing and good luck from now on!
I will beghin tests myself but not wight now, because I don`t have the time, but sun 

Regads!