Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Frederic2k1]

Im tired of this, reading forum, thinking of how to make it work, making experiment with failed result. Why is it so hard to make an overunity device? If theres really a God please tell me how can i build one... This is my only hope in life. Please God tell me.

Yes, it is my only hope also. I see no future for human life on earth without free energy.


We have peak oil, the big fields in saudi are declining, the next war for oil is standing right at the door in the middle east, the economy isn't working anymore in europe and the us...


What the hell am I doing here on this ball of shit circulating around the sun ? 

[Neo-X]

@Frederic2k1

I dont the get the point why the government keep using oil if they can use free energy as a source of money? For example they build a free energy machine then connect it to the transmition line to power the residential home and charge them?  They can also charge electric car user by establishing a battery charging stations. Government earn money from us and we can have a very cheap electric bill.

[jbignes5]

 Ok lets figure this out from a simplistic point of view.


If coil A is the primary the coil A has a magnetic field right? And that field gets sucked into the core. How does the magnetic field cut the wires of coil B?

The easiest answer is to say there is something else involved in the process of this setup. We know there are two fields at play here. Not one but two. Since the magnetic field is contained in the core the electric field is the only field to play in this example. This electric field is the one responsible for induction and not the magnetic like is wrongly taught.

Now just how does that electric field work is the question.

refer to picture 2

Now if we understand that there is a twist to the fields that travel down the wire we can conclude that the electric field lines revolve around the wire and this is what cuts the wires on the opposite side of the core.

We have been lied to and when simple logic is used we find the truth.

Now if we apply static laws to the electric lines of the conductor That must mean that the conductor have opposite polarities on opposite sides of this mass (conductor) With one line being imaginary (-). The +'s being real. In the conductor that charges group to the positive lines and the negative opposite spaces are chargeless or (-).

I'm thinking the positive lines are real charges from the mass of the conductor and if we enhance the conductor with high voltages it pulls more out of the mass of copper into the extended electric line.

As to the number of lines in a single layer I have no clue. In the second picture I believe there is way to many lines. It was merely drawn for example. If we look at it from the point of view of the world model there should be only two lines of potential. One chargeless(-) an one charge full (+). The negative line is much the same as the Iron to magnetic fields. It sucks up charges from whatever it touches and the positive lines give charges. One is an in and the other is an out. One could take the second picture as looking down the length of the conductor showing the progression of the line pairs along the conductor. So the second picture is viewing 4 pairs of lines.

[wattsup]

@all

About the 2004 device, seems to me that since those diodes are screw and nut types they may be available in two directions depending on which one you need on the chassis. I have diodes that go one way and others that go the other way. Here is one type I have on hand plus one I found quickly by google imaging "stud diode".

Can the transformer itself be considered a capacitor as if it is used like a catapult or a photon gun.

Look at the wires how thin they are going from the tin can to the diodes. So why then do they use such big diodes? Is it the need to rectify something heavy coming in or is it the need to keep what's going on in the transformer from going backwards and frying what's in the tin can?

Now if the diodes worked the other way as we would all obviously consider at first glance, again what's the point of having such thin wires. In this direction it makes no sense since those wires will not transport any major juice. But they are big enough to pulse backwards through the diode pack against the AC secondary with a DC of the same frequency or other harmonic. Don't know. 

The transformer was making a real big noise but it was drawing only 6 amps 12 vdc from the battery. That battery is a 80 or 100 amp battery and only 6 amps was drawn from it by that rather big inverter. This means the inverter was also being used as an energy delimiter, keeping the havoc inside the transformer A B fields and being shot at higher voltage towards the Tin Can on the AC5 line and back towards the inverter itself thus making battery draw so low. If the TKc and the spark winds up being a crock, then the OU has to be in that first transformer and TK had a secret there that he is showing in the 2004. After that, times up and everything is all boxed up except the TK coil. Hun. hehehe There is a transformer like the 2004 one in the Aq2v.

AC cannot fall on itself, but if it passes from AC to DC and back into the AC, then it can create some havoc. And that would pass the simpleton criteria.

All these possibilities are tantalizing but I consider it out of the box enough to warrant some quick trials.

But consider it again, under the diagram I posted, technically if the AC is fed to the secondary A, then the primary B is what if it is connected to the DC side of the bridge. Is it considered a short? Should not. So the inverter is cycling into the secondary but the primary is not connected so it sees nothing but the two other wires AC5 that head into the Tin Can. Now when the primary pulses back a DC in the core, what does the secondary coil see? Does it see a short now? Hmmmm. Can anyone do a sim on that? Is this simable? lol

wattsup

[kooler]

@all


Look at the wires how thin they are going from the tin can to the diodes. So why then do they use such big diodes? Is it the need to rectify something heavy coming in or is it the need to keep what's going on in the transformer from going backwards and frying what's in the tin can?


wattsup

hey,
back when i was building cdu's for high volts or current.. i worked half the night trying to figure out why when i tried to discharge a 5-10uf cap or larger it would not fire.. i tried all kinds of different scr's and sidac's and all it was .. the diodes that was feeding my capicators.. once it got to the discharge time it would blow back thur my diodes and not my transformer.. my setup was hv trans with 3 amp diodes to caps.. and i had to change those out for 20 amp diodes..