Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 516 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on September 28, 2012, 05:50:15 PM
There is one problem, I can't see an E-core divided with a dielectric split in the image of the green transformer. This green transformer looks pristine to me.

But what I can see is, the alligator clamps and wires are fitted with red and blue markings. Why?

Is this not AC but DC, therefore the polarity does matter? It can't be smooth DC either, because it is connected in series with capacitors. So as it seems the output of this Melnichenko inverter is pulsed DC or AC with DC bias. Thus the question is, a) what waveform has the blue Kapanadze inverter, and b) what could be the difference if a transformer runs with pulsed DC (full-wave rectification) instead of AC?


I don't think he used the whole system of that guys. He only used the transformer idea to separate the input from the output. In the yard version of the video he shows the transformer ans the diode bridge were in one package and only added when he wanted to self run the whole device. It was the isolation idea that he used. I don't think this other guy reall contributed much to the whole device. only the ability to loop the generated power back into the inverter so they could remove the battery.


The really big part is what was in the can. One thing is for sure it needs shielding from the coils. This was evident by them saying the voltmeters were being effected in the yard version of the videos. My bet is it is a pancake coil in oil. The transistors drive the pancake coil and if you look a very high voltage wire light blue comes out of the green box to feed the spark then larger outer coil of the coil pair.


I was mistaken in my thoughts that there were 3 coils it seems. The ground wire goes through the two coils and acts like a ground plane channel for the field the large copper pipe coil emits. Which by the way the field goes through the load coil on the way to the ground plane channel. It seems to me that this is the proverbial create a container below water and allow the energy to flow into the channel. The water in this case is the electric field and the free charges in the environment flow twords this channel via the electric field. As they flow twords the channel they impart part of their charge.


Well thats as much as I can figure at this point.


Having a translation of the backyard presentation definitely explains tons.

Farmhand

Hi Zeitmaschine, There can be a difference between active and neutral wires in an AC output,
if the neutral is connected to ground as it is here (Australia) then the difference is very important.
The positive 12 volts of a battery can be made the same as "ground" as well, then the negative is - 12 volts not 0 volts.
It depends on the reference.

With an AC system with a grounded neutral, the neutral is always held to the same potential as the ground.
Theoretically it is safe to touch a grounded neutral wire and the ground though I wouldn't do that in case of a fault,
but if the active is touched and the body is grounded, bye bye fried human.
Many things can be done in a custom system. A piece of red and blue tape on the output wires means nothing unless you know what it represents.
To find out what the red and blue marking represent you would need to ask the person who did it and get an honest answer or reverse engineer the system
personally first hand. The blue and red markings on the AC output of a transformer most likely represent neutral and active, but it could represent a "tap" and neutral
or a tap and active or whatever else is possible.

Cheers

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on September 28, 2012, 05:50:15 PM
There is one problem, I can't see an E-core divided with a dielectric split in the image of the green transformer. This green transformer looks pristine to me.

But what I can see is, the alligator clamps and wires are fitted with red and blue markings. Why?

Is this not AC but DC, therefore the polarity does matter? It can't be smooth DC either, because it is connected in series with capacitors. So as it seems the output of this Melnichenko inverter is pulsed DC or AC with DC bias. Thus the question is, a) what waveform has the blue Kapanadze inverter, and b) what could be the difference if a transformer runs with pulsed DC (full-wave rectification) instead of AC?

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: verpies on September 28, 2012, 05:18:38 AM
Quote from: forest on September 28, 2012, 01:07:59 AM
what is the cause of saturation of core anyway ? Rised voltage ?  :o

Saturation is a magnetic phenomenon, and besides the core properties, the magnetic flux is dependent only on instantaneous current and turn count.
An the molecular level saturation of the core is caused by all of the domains aligning in one direction. Once the align that way, they cannot align any more.
Saturation decreases the differential permeability but does not decrease the absolute permeability.

What causes current? Mr Ohm wrote that it's the voltage (e.g. EMF) and resistance, like this: I=V/R

Now, for variety, here is an easy question: What happens if a transformer's core is near saturation so the magnetic flux can just travel from the primary to the secondary coil, but the magnetic flux created by the current in the secondary coil saturates the core completely so the magnetic flux cannot travel back from the secondary to the primary coil? And wouldn't the easiest way to create such a saturation be a magnetic field generated by a superimposed (bias) DC voltage?

Just wondering ...  ???

Qwert

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on September 28, 2012, 05:50:15 PM
.......

Quote from: jbignes5 on September 28, 2012, 06:54:38 PM
.......

@jbignes5, I guess @Zeitmaschine refers into different topic: you refer to a Kapanadze video while he mentions this Melnichenko video (see it at about 1:05):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-BY0kUEmis&feature=related

bass

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYwTVN4orqw&feature=related

It is not the principle which used Kapanadze
Melnichenko said about the series resonance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-BY0kUEmis&feature=related
Fan is used here as an inductance in series LC resonance circuit

Unknown detail is  a Soviet capacitor ÐœÐ"Ð'О

In the second scheme in this video Melnichenko had to be replaced in the resonant circuit capacitor to achieve the resonance as he powered the motor through transformer which have another inductive