Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 535 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: Farmhand on January 22, 2013, 06:05:44 AM
Can you show us where Tesla claimed any OU or over 100% efficiency with any of these devices which are just coils, capacitors and spark gaps ect. ? Give us a reference.
I think Tesla's OU claims were seized not by the FBI but by the Department of Justice Alien Property Custodian Office and never released to the public.

The best known Tesla OU claim is that of his electric car, but according to wikipedia this story is »considered to be a fabrication«, because »of the fact that Tesla did not have a nephew by the name of Peter Savo«.

But perhaps this wikipedia story is a fabrication too,  because there is no quotation about the alleged »fact« that »Tesla did not have a nephew by the name of Peter Savo«. Maybe he had nevertheless.


NickZ

  @ Hoppy:
      Ok, what I meant was: is there any TK type of device with the same or similar working systems, that can be built and worked towards replicating. That works in a useable, practical,  daily way,  now???

   The yoke device was not even replicated using a yoke core, although they are showing a possible Metglass shaped torroid, as their replication of the yoke device. This may not be a true TK device. Doesn't even look or work like Tk devices.
Or does it?
  Makes me think that the yoke device was not what they were all really excited about, and that they stumbled onto something that they really may not want to show us. And fear was the real motive for not going further with it, to obtain a kw power output device.
  So, the solution is the same, what can be built as mentioned above? 
All you Tk followers....


jbignes5

"Vacuum tubes operate primarily with high voltages that control the ion flows. Modern transistors are equivalent to vacuum tubes except that they operate using CURRENT instead of voltage. Transistors equate to Vacuum tubes by the following comparisons :
.                    Vacuum Tube               Transistor      Polarity
.              Operates from Voltage           Current
.                      lower plate                  emitter         negative cathode
.                          grid                        base            neutral
.                      upper plate                  collector       positive - anode

  In the case of the Tesla Power Box, the vacuum tube appears to function as a "pump", collecting incoming current in the form of ion intensification. Once this "compressed" ion field reaches a certain density, the pump allows it to be released into the next stage of the circuit, be it the actual load or another vacuum tube.  So if the circuit is 6 vacuum tubes in parallel, all fed from a common antenna, outputting to a common load terminal, then the common antenna input would feed all vacuum tubes with the same wave. This would give the greatest CURRENT accumulation because of the EXPANDED SURFACE AREA of the paralleled tubes.  Note, these vacuum tubes most likely operate in the "cold cathode" mode since the heaters of the vacuum tubes were not fed by any outside voltage to provide the heat for the more orthodox therionic emission.
  If the vacuum tubes are hooked in series, then one "pump" would feed another "pump" to get successively higher densities of electrons. This would give higher VOLTAGES because of increased PRESSURE.  Keep in mind that electricity is much like air or water. We can think of voltage as pounds per square inch (PSI) and current as cubic feet per minute (CFM). That is PSI is pressure, CFM is flow.  Another analog is comparing a river to electricity. In such a comparison, the speed of the river is the VOLTAGE or pressure while the width of the river is the CURRENT or rate of flow.  Such a comparison shows WHY current requires THE GREATEST SURFACE AREA for the maximum flow. Fuses function on just this principle, when the current flows over the surface of the fuse, it creates heat. If too much current flows, it creates too much heat causing the fuse to melt and separate. The more surface area the fuse, the greater the amount of current can flow, another reason to not place a penny in a fuse socket.
  So we have two antennas (1/4" diameter, 3" long rods), two sets of 6 vacuum tubes connected together by wire and assorted resistors. As the waves of energy are collected by the 3" rods, positive on one, negative on another, the energy builds up in the form of increased ions in each of the paralleled vacuum tubes. As in Moray's generator, the circuit will feed whatever load is attached as long as it does not EXCEED the current carrying capacity of the circuit components. What we have is an energy pumping system."

  Anyone trying to replicate this effect without using the proper components will fail. ie subsituting silicon for tubes. Tubes work differently and I bet this is the main reason we are seeing nothing in return. Tubes work with voltages not current. Silicon works with current. We are using the wrong components all together.

wasabi

Quote from: jbignes5 on January 22, 2013, 11:29:00 AM
Tubes work with voltages not current. Silicon works with current.
That is such bullshit!

As switches, both of these electronic components can block voltage or conduct current. The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use.
Just because vacuum tubes are generally rated for higher blocking voltage and semiconductors are rated for higher conduction currents does not mean that one "works" with voltage and the other with current.

Stop worshiping high voltage and Tesla!
The whole world switched to semiconductors because the have smaller conduction resistance (among other benefits) needed for most applications - this is not a conspiracy.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: NickZ on January 22, 2013, 11:28:29 AM
This may not be a true TK device. Doesn't even look or work like Tk devices.
Or does it?
There is no true TK device, simply because no one knows for sure what the power generating part of the TK devices looks like. Each TK device looks different. Small coil, big coil, helical coil, tiny spark, noisy spark, no spark and so on. This means that what can be seen does not generate the power, and that what cannot be seen could be anything.

Hence the best thing to do in order to get a true TK device is to find something that generates electric power and then place some TK type showcase elements around it. :) ::)