Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

HEY Zeit,  Theres you Transformer with 4 secondarys on it, the little one..  Have you given up so easly on that Russian Patent??

Tried it with four SCR Trigger Transformers. Strange waveforms showed up on the screen of the oscilloscope but no resonance.

IMO opinion a copper foil should be used, not copper braid.  The working device used a foil.

And this foil drives the primary magnetic circuit into saturation, especially when a spark is applied to it.

That means -if I'm correct- that the primary coil must operate near (or in) magnetic saturation in order to get the OU effect. The primary coil bumps the secondary coil (with twice the frequency) but not vice versa. And I can see no reason why this should not work in the range of 50Hz instead of Mhz.

Also, I noticed that on this page Antanas has links to dozens of devices but not to the Yoke device.

This website is a collection of non-working schematics to keep people busy for nothing. So a working schematic there was quite inappropriate and had to be removed quickly.

Anyway I have always wondered what kind of a difference it could be mentioned in one of the TK patents. In a parametric transformer the difference would be the frequency, as it seems. Interesting so far given the obscure TK patent description.

Supplement: Could it be that the yoke device works only with that special Russian type of ferrite (ОС-90.38ПЦ12) because it is low quality and therefore it is easier to magnetically saturate it?

[Osiakosia]

hi

can someone explain what is behind mr Antanas on this page:
http://www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/antanas_energy_6/

is with next pic's (oscilator circuit) something same?

Only Antanas personaly can answer this question .
Big part of information all of us can find at
http://energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9673-wesley-stivep1-video-high-voltage-frequency-ou.html


http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9781-tigers-device-0-150-1kwt-replicant-9.html


and
http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/45/#.URKIaPLH1c0


http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php?topic=1056.msg38678#msg38678


Best regards

[verpies]

Supplement: Could it be that the yoke device works only with that special Russian type of ferrite (ОС-90.38ПЦ12) because it is low quality and therefore it is easier to magnetically saturate it?

Anything is possible. That ferrite  is not made out of a very advanced material. I would not be surprised a large portion of it was clay.
"Inferior" parts sometimes work better for exotic applications.
Case in point: Old soviet rectifier diodes have such sloppy diffuse semiconductor junctions, that they work better as DSRDs for generating nanopulses in kW range, than modern diodes with "sharp" PN junctions.

[NickZ]

  Verpies: 
   Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions, as well as all the other questions.

   I think that the next important point for my replication of the yoke device is to be able to run it from two 12v batteries, instead of the G1 and G2. If this is not possible, then I'm not sure as to how to proceed. I've learned that sometimes we make things more complicated than they really are. And there may be ways to simplify this yoke device's input source, also. Even without all the transistors and other components found in the SG, etz...
Ideally, I would use solar power to charge a couple of 12v batteries, as the input source for the yoke device. As relying on SG and SA, is not going to work in a real power out situation.

[verpies]

Ideally, I would use solar power to charge a couple of 12VDC batteries, as the input source for the yoke device. As relying on SG and SA, is not going to work in a real power out situation.

Yes, in a non-research unit, a cheap transistor or IC oscillators would have to be used instead of the expensive programmable signal generators.  For example one of these oscillators in the MHz range.