Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

What's this got to do with TK's device?

Kapanadze has a passion about capacitors. Hence I have to do more homework for fun.

[jbignes5]

 I think this is the best representation of the capacitor question you posed.


http://www.csun.edu/~gsl05670/labs/cap_plate_sep_volt.htm

It works with voltage and charge. Not energy persay. Energy in my opinion has an active definition and not a standing definition..
Active meaning to do something and standing meaning potential to do something or hasn't done anything yet.
Anyways see how they talk about charge and voltage. Where they store charge in the electric field?
My take on this is that the charge is based  in the structure of the object and represented on the surface of an object. The electric field allows those charges to be represented on the other surface. I don't think the field stores anything. The field organizes and allows charges to pose or influence the other side of the space via the electric field between the plates.

The easiest representation of a capacitor is a diaphragm. Nothing actually moves from plate to plate this is accomplished by the ability of the electric field to originate from one charge structure and motivate the other plate via the electric field. It is a static device. No current moves through the device and if it does odds on are if it does conduct it is a dielectric break down and ruins the capacitor. Some capacitors have a self healing ability, such as in the case of the electrolytic capacitor. These breakdowns can be seen if you take the cap apart. There will be little scars on the surface of the plates where the oxide was burnt away. The healing type of caps like the electrolytic caps use the liquid inside to repair the breach and re-oxidize the breach.

As you can see there are a Great many ideas that are not agreeing with one another in our scientific theories. This waffling back and forth of accepted theories only goes to confuse us and most are designed to do just that.This is the crux to our problem. And hence is the problem we all face. No wonder many are confused about this stuff.

[Zeitmaschine]

Another dry theory (don't know how to get it wet):

Two capacitors each 1µF are connected in parallel and charged with 10 volts. When connected in series the voltage doubles to 20 volts but the capacitance is quartered to 0.5µF, therefore the stored energy stays the same. Now disconnect the capacitors so the capacitance of each would be 1µF at 10 volts. Then take the 10 volts of the second capacitor and add it to the 10 volts of the first capacitor so the first one is now 1µF at 20 volts. Then this capacitor would contain twice the initial energy.

2µF at 10V = 100µ Joules (parallel), 0.5µF at 20V = 100µ Joules (series), but 1µF at 20V = 200µ Joules

Now how to transfer a voltage from one capacitor to a second capacitor in a way that the voltage sum up (without losses)?

Any great ideas?

[Grumage]

To hell with clues, spend some time doing research and just better yourself. It took me all of 5 minutes to find a build manual on Google books. Whats your excuse? Now, go get yourself a cup of hot coco and sharpen your tools. I present to you a gift and I expect to see a finished product within the next month or so. You have only yourself to blame if you don't build this because this is a Step-by-Step guide.

Your Beloved

-Core

I thank you for your rather curt responce to my question, but will leave the Cocoa to those that need it!!  I studied the text and have drawn a conclusion that there are many discrepancies with the transformer, in relation to the one described by Tesla. The most important one being, made with an Iron rod core. Surely that is going to have a detrimental effect on the frequency?

So with this in mind I am going to persue Tesla's described construction.

Any way, wire for the secondary winding on order. Drawings for the Nylon parts at the plastics company. lathe on standby. I am going to replace the wooden former with a solid Nylon rod. Machine each end to create bobbin style primary winding carriers then sleeve them with 86mm O/D tubes. I have now got the gist of the Primary winding, 4 layers of 24 turns each end. It also states that the secondary windings are wound opposite to each other. Same goes for the primary. But my only query.... Which would be the best way of coupling Pri to sec? Pri CW sec CCW? Or both same direction? Perhaps I have answered my own question? As the two halves interact with each other then Pri/Sec should probably run together?

Addendum. As I am making a reasonably high tech build, ie modern materials, what about a high tech driver? Any ideas?

[pepsimaxzu]

hey guys, iam new in this forum and i have one question for now. i have 20 ferite toroids :Al=3450nH f49xf31.8xf19mm it wil be ok?