Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[captainkt]

@jbignes5, I agree 100% with you.
Regards
Keith

[NoBull]

I have never talked about beta decay because there is no such thing. There is no electrons just the electric potential of the atom itself. Wow you guys really don't get that do you? This is an electric field excitation of matter.

Those are just unsubstantiated words. It seems that you are ignoring experimental evidence to suit your preconceptions.
Beta particle tracks can be seen in the Cloud Chamber.  A "field" does not leave tracks behind. 
Here are videos of experimental proofs of beta decay: video1,  video2,  video3,  video4.

Also, you can educate yourself about the deflection of beta particles by a magnetic field in this video and this video

There is no electrons just the electric potential of the atom itself. Wow you guys really don't get that do you? This is an electric field excitation of matter.

Again, you are ignoring experimental evidence to suit your preconceptions again.
Electron beams can exist in vacuum in absence of matter.  Electrons are invisible until they hit matter. 
For example see the Cathode Rays and the CRT for proof.  Here is the relevant video.

Instead they make names up and make believe electrons to explain it differently then what is explained so very easily by the electric field.

You are wrong again.
An electric field is incapable of casting a sharp shadow like the one in the Crookes Tube.  Electric field is diffuse (see the inverse square relationship between charges and distance, e.g. Coulomb's Law).
However a beam of particles can cast a sharp shadow. Here is the relevant video.

Also, without a beam of electrons the electron microscope could not function and produce sharp images at those magnifications.

The commonalities are the exact process I have been talking about all the while. The only differences is the new names beta and electron... Total BS..
If the electron exists then show us all this marvelous particle.

Very well.
Extremely short attosecond laser pulses can illuminate electrons in motion and they have been photographed.  Here is the relevant video and relevant paper.

Also, the behavior of electron beams in a CRT or Crookes Tube is exactly the same as the electrons emitted from beta decay.
For example, in the following videos you can see the same bending of electron trajectories by electric and magnetic fields. 
See electron beams and thieir deflection in magnetic field in video1 and video2 and video3 and video4

Ask stivep what my real responses were all the time. He knows.. Obviosly you don't with such a low post count... Go back and look and stop trying to lay some BS...

That looks like a personal attack.  Are you running out evidence to support your beliefs?


@ALL
I am new here and I don't know this guy, so I've got some questions.
Q1 - Is it Jbignes5's habit to resort to personal attacks when he runs out of arguments ?
Q2 - Does Jbignes5 do any experiments to confirm his beliefs ?
Q3 - Does Jbignes5 consider experimental evidence of others scientists besides Tesla and Tesla followers ?

[ramset]

NoBull


You live up to your name sake!
Welcome to the forum,


As you say only experiments can lead the way down this path ,not conjecture.


thx
Chet

[Vortex1]

I suggested the possible use of belts hidden in the overly large and modified pillow block bases in this thread, post #27, and supplied a crude drawing of how this might be done.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1528.25

[stivep]

to


NoBull

there is another dimension of understanding physics.
The  big bang theory has been changed over the  years.
Quantum theory put in questions.
Maxwellian science not answering   to new approach
Einstein  for  his maximum speed - in denial and so on.
Perception  uses operators of known factors to create  even more new one.


Jules Verne  has been in field of total science fiction in his time
I have 5 hours video to translate of Russian thinker and matematican  name him scientist as this apply NOT only to PHDs
You would be surprised how different are ways of understanding matter.


Electron as descriptor of phenomena is alive only for reason of comfort.
How is in pure undeniable reality depends of VIEWER only or say ability and tools viewer is equipped with by nature as well.
Dog can not see colors
But say we have our imaginary  dog  that  has perception at human level
You asking him (it) a question what is color?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
would be that compatible to ask human what really is magnetism what makes it?
How it works?
What makes presence  of magnetic field as constant in  magnet? and if  decay in years than why? What is losing?
Does magnetic field lines are matter or pure energy?

matter and energy are actually different forms of the same thing. E=mc2

is it?
How many forms of energy  do we have? Do they interact  with themselves?

What really is a pure energy- it does have no mass ( photon) So what really is pure energy?
Is magnetic flux of magnet different energy if any?
Why this energy is not consumable?

How come  there is no interaction with  steady magnetic field creating   alteration of magnet field?
Why magnet is always body by itself holding its independence  and manifesting  independence?
Say  why magnet always "say"

F..k you ain't No Bugs on Me  I'm independent do not look at me just accept me as you   have no choice.



or  why  electron  is in motion  all the time what? perpetum mobile ?
Why atom energy supporting movement of electron is never consumed?
Well some   of scientists found COMFORTABLE EXPLANATION
Space  occupied by atom is a vacuum
- no friction  no loses than body put in motion stays in motion
who put it in motion?  GOD?

- how do I know that?
I got it from school
And GOD in my brain is  born out of  religion classes.



Be my guest.
even if you answer all  of the questions at one single point of it  you will find yourself "stuck in the toilet" and thinking of non traditional temporary way to take your butt out.
That is exactly when  new ways of understanding are being born
You look at your butt and all you see( that you did not see before) that all " scientific human waste"
You say no problem I can clean it up.

YES.............
that clean up was made  many times using traditional physics
with only one exception - from that point in time there was  new different modified physics.
The traditional physicists  are always afraid of accepting new  ways of  clean up.
Some of them use  toilet paper   and some possible their own finger.

There are some scientists in university ,who say "I put my scientific butt under  water" every time after - but only in privacy of my  home.
But than in "public scientific  toilette" they are ashamed  of doing so because others are looking at him  like
to an idiot. Not accepting that this is new way of keeping "real scientific  hygiene."
in the effect they get eventually "scientific Hemorrhoids"

Than I talk to few at symposium and they say  Wesley  You want me to lose my  job? Please Wesley understand" Public Scientific Toilette" is not prepared to wash my butt in it publicly  Someone will say that I contaminate a" sink "
THEY  ARE NOT READY,
the infrastructure is not ready ,
the privacy is not there,
The  toilette system is not ready,
The human reaction is not ready,


and most of them  is afraid of  being to radical.
They are being paid by government money so   is me and others in private school are  even more dependent.
I'm not going to show my butt in  public  "science toilette" but I  can show my face with the smile on it,  and shut my mouth till  I see
someone doing so.

GOT IT?



Wesley