Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

The emissions are not coming from the coil, they are being emitted from the battery (Note video  http://youtu.be/LXtYB4PDXf4). When I check the coil with the giger counter, there is no emissions. The only place I can detect emissions is from the battery. The results (emissions) are the same when I place a sheet of aluminum between the giger counter head and the battery.

Hello br549,

At first you have my congrats and envy for the nice experimentation setup you got there. I am most interested in your Coleman results..

Regarding that battery pulsing you do.. its interesting. Especially to the part you say geiger tube does not detect "emisions" on the coil rather than near the battery. Also behind a aluminium sheet. Grounded maybe?
If it is not much of a fuss, can i humbly ask you to make a vid and clearly demonstrate the above issues? i.e. pulsing the battery thus detecting emisions whereas not in the inductor?
Maybe you can use some solid state or better mechanical make n break switch. A self oscillating relay is a best choise imo (driven by a 555 at 10-100Hz lets say) just to release your arms and prolong the observation time.
An open flux iron cored inductor will be most suitable for the task, just for illustrational purposes.
In other words, what i have in mind is that to demostrate or eliminate the possibility of pulsing the lead battery releases true radiation either a,b or gamma and not pure RF that still ionizes the tube.

I am unconfortable to sit in my archair and give directives, but for the time i lack a lab and geiger counter.

Cheers and well done

[br549]

Hello br549,

At first you have my congrats and envy for the nice experimentation setup you got there. I am most interested in your Coleman results..

Regarding that battery pulsing you do.. its interesting. Especially to the part you say geiger tube does not detect "emisions" on the coil rather than near the battery. Also behind a aluminium sheet. Grounded maybe?
If it is not much of a fuss, can i humbly ask you to make a vid and clearly demonstrate the above issues? i.e. pulsing the battery thus detecting emisions whereas not in the inductor?
Maybe you can use some solid state or better mechanical make n break switch. A self oscillating relay is a best choise imo (driven by a 555 at 10-100Hz lets say) just to release your arms and prolong the observation time.
An open flux iron cored inductor will be most suitable for the task, just for illustrational purposes.
In other words, what i have in mind is that to demostrate or eliminate the possibility of pulsing the lead battery releases true radiation either a,b or gamma and not pure RF that still ionizes the tube.

I am unconfortable to sit in my archair and give directives, but for the time i lack a lab and geiger counter.

Cheers and well done

baroutologos / T1000
Hate to admit it, you guys were on the right track, and since I would never fabricate eronious results to camouflage a mistake, here is the scoop.  http://youtu.be/6r7BhIwQgoY
As Always;  Have a Good Day

[NickZ]

  br549:
  If you were to pulse that transformer with an oscillator creating HV pulses, you'll find that everything including the wires, battery, transformer, and the surrounding area will all make the Geiger counter sing.  Yet, no free energy or OU, coming from the Colman device, yet. Much less, 10kw for an hour and a half, from a few seconds pulse.  I'm not trying to deduce that it's not possible, I'm just saying that Geiger counters aren't proving that there is an output of extra energy (alfa/beta/x-ray/gamma radiations) from the Colman tube emissions, due to this HV or RF interference on the G-counter.
Although your test was not done using HV pulses,  thanks for taking the time to show us your results.
                      NickZ

[screen]

Brazilian government reprisals against Captor of Electrons.
Government tries to end the invention

link: http://oprogressonet.com/noticiario/14822/policia/2013/10/4/empresarios-sao-presos-acusados-de-receptacao/

[baroutologos]

baroutologos / T1000
Hate to admit it, you guys were on the right track, and since I would never fabricate eronious results to camouflage a mistake, here is the scoop.  http://youtu.be/6r7BhIwQgoY
As Always;  Have a Good Day

Thanks br549 for your prompt reply. Again some issues remain so as to why the battery is a better RF emitter or (whatever emission) than the inductor etc. Perhaps due to its sheer surface? Maybe.
Again i still have some questions on your original reply that you said the emissions could be tracked also behind a thin aluminium sheet (foil). If the sheet is large enough and grounded, then i see it as least likely to be rf rather beta or gamma radiation. Of course i am not specialist, but i see the case to be so.

Please give a try placing the geiger probe behind with the thin aluminium foil (grounded). Actually the whole setup shoud be better enclosed with it. If the geiger counter persists then you are onto something really interesting