Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[skywalker66]

Using the ground as an electron pump can only work at high frequencies and/or high voltage (Tesla).
It will not work at mains voltages.
Don Smith used high voltages and spark gaps to get frequency.
Benitez in the patent  17811 I have referred to, uses a wimhurst machine to get volts and a series of Tesla switches
to get frequency.
Kapanadze uses high frequency and static.
E V Gray used High frequency and static.
Melnychenko in his Russian patent uses static and radio frequencies.

It work for HV DC also when a large metal plate is electrostatic charged  in respect to the ground. See Van der Graaf generator. Or when you get charged when get off an wool sweater and then touch something metalized or grounded get shocked.

[jbignes5]

Do this with a 25KV charge picture tube as HV capacitor. See what happens.

»The third plate of a capacitor which has a metal can, is the can itself and to use it as a three-plate capacitor, a connecting wire is attached to the can.«

3-Phase capacitors typically have such a metal can, even with screw mounting. Is it pure coincidence that TK uses a whole bank of these capacitors?

1. Is simple to build and has a long, trouble-free life. (that's indeed an unaccustomed feature nowadays)
2. Uses only a few, readily available parts. (from the junkyard)
3. Only a very low level of understanding is needed. (my level complies with this)
4. Once it is installed, the energy provided is free. (what a pity for all meter manufacturers)
5. The energy source is available everywhere. (unfortunately I can't test it on the Moon)
6. It fulfills any and all energy requirements, for example, cars and aeroplanes. (only some power plants will have to close down)

So what's still the problem? Did I miss something?

Me and a friend worked on the 3 plate cap. We called it a captret. Very interesting device. There is something about the 3 way of plates mixed with capacitance that allows it to energize the other plate via the electric field. This energizing effect further polarizes the cap. Sorta like a non polarized cap being made polarized. Once one set of plates forms a charge the other plate gets a sympathetic charge for free. It uses a common pairing of plates from case to negative plate of the cap to form the capacitance. Then you hook your device to be used to the common connections of the capacitor to pull power from.
This was extrapolated from experiments where one could touch the can of the capacitor and energy would appear in the capacitor from seemingly no where. Every radio guy will attest to this.


As for the health issues of this type of energy Tesla used, Well Tesla found this energy to be very beneficial to the human condition at a certain impulses per second(2000+). Please understand that the type of energy Tesla was using was impulses and not AC. AC creates a back and forth motion while impulses only energize in one direction. If enough impulses are present, the object, no matter what it is, stays energized and does not de-energize while the field is in effect. Another experiment verifies this finding. It's called an exciter circuit.


You can use this as a reference: http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml

Most think that Tesla was all about AC well for a little bit he was. But when he started to see that others wanted to put a price on the free flowing Niagrafalls and not use it to advance the human condition he was abhorred.

As luck would have it when Tesla came to USA, Edison was having trouble with his system for which Tesla was Temporarily employed under the false pretense of being paid 50k for fixing Edison's problem. This is where Tesla learned about Radiant energy and learned about Edison's and mans cruel Humor. These guys were all about creating Money streams and not about advancing the human Condition. We know Tesla was all about the human condition because of this work: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1900-06-00.htm

That information is a bit out of order but you get the point.

Lets look at the difference between AC half rectified and impulses.

At the same frequency of 2k we can see this.

|_|_|_| <--- AC half rectified
||||||||  <----Impulses

AC half rectified will always be Half or more less in frequency then IMPULSE technology. Since Impulse Technology can maintain the excitation of the target better we can see why it works better. I am of the opinion that AC half Rectified is impulse like but not enough to get the impulse effect. Tesla talked about the spark gap feeding a stout bar of copper. Well in the case of TK isn't that what is around his 2005 coil system? Isn't it fed by a spark gap?

Tesla shows what is needed to make this system in a very economical and simple transformer version. HERE: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

Figure 3 is that transformer!

To further polarize the system he employs a magnetic field around the spark gap... Isn't it funny that TK puts the spark gap very close to the coils in his system?

Lets now touch on the stout copper and how it responds to the impulses. Impulses are one way. There is no negative direction. So where would the other half of the energy be coming from. From all around the stout copper bar. And to boot in the case of TK he uses a coil of stout copper. What happens when you pulse a copper coil? It responds with a very high voltage bemf. A conversion of the input to fill the gaps of a half rectified AC signal as a sort of response from the input. Lets look at an analogy. What happens when you push your hand forcefully into a pool of water? BABoom and a response of the water as it pushes back with all the force of the total pools volume to create a geyser.

When I started looking at the other experiments of TK I saw many parallels to Tesla's experiments. This included the Transformer I mentioned above in figure 3. If you read down further in that Lecture you will see the one wire application of the transformer in respects to the motor TK built in the Warehouse Video in figure 17. In TK's version he used TWO disks and two iron bars under the disks.
You can see them in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY

Where the disks are you can see they go into the base a bit. This is where the iron bars are that have the coils on them. The only other thing you need is the oscillator transformer I mentioned above and a surface of metal as the virtual ground as shown in the Tesla lecture. There have been some improvements in TK's system because he uses two disks and a way to couple them together by a coil in between them. If that is a valid fact we will have to see. There is a lot of flim flam in his devices to make them look complicated because he didn't want people to see just how easy it was to do and in fact I have had some conversations with people who were in contact with TK, Those conversations always involved money so to protect his knowledge he uses a shield of large investment to release that information. But it isn't needed. All we need to do is build the transformer oscillator and do the Tesla experiment. Everything else can be rediscovered very easily. In fact this is my goal. When I get my lab running these things will be redone and shown for what they are in very concise and frank videos that will completely dissect the device after running the device to show there is no flim flam.

Here is the challenge that I would like to extend to you all. Beat me to this... Do the Tesla experiments before I prove you all wrong. Do them correctly and as Tesla has set forth. Do not change a thing even if it goes against your teachings. Replicate Tesla's experiments and you will see the truth one way or the other and lets put this over drawn conversation to bed.

[captainkt]

@Zeit, regarding one wire and free energy. If out you get 25KW through a very very thin wire, standard thinking dictates 25KW must go in, however the wire in between with the best will in the world would melt at 1 or max 2KW regardless of what it is made of so thinking practical a lot less must go in for wires to hold up? After all Kapanadze uses 400w in 5KW out. Does single wire transfer use a similar ratio in to out.
Regards
Keith

[Hoppy]

@Zeit, regarding one wire and free energy. If out you get 25KW through a very very thin wire, standard thinking dictates 25KW must go in, however the wire in between with the best will in the world would melt at 1 or max 2KW regardless of what it is made of so thinking practical a lot less must go in for wires to hold up? After all Kapanadze uses 400w in 5KW out. Does single wire transfer use a similar ratio in to out.
Regards
Keith

Captain,

Where did you get the 400W in for Kapanadze?

[Hoppy]

But bringing a live x wire for kapanadze in the middle of the woods will be even harder, not to mention burying a large radiator there .

No problem if you are a magician like Kapanadze.