Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Hoppy]

@Zeit, The transformer with possible split core and 3rd winding does not need thick wires as the inverter is only 400watts feeding the primary,also the possible 3rd winding under paper and over the secondary looks very thick to me .
Regards
Keith

It looks to me as if it could have been completely re-wound with thick wire. Is he somehow mixing low voltage, high current with high voltage generated in the tin can??

Keep thinking and speculating. 

[captainkt]

@Hoppy, yes and if as Melnychenco claims the secondary does not see the primary with split core ?
Regards
Keith

[Hoppy]

@Hoppy, yes and if as Melnychenco claims the secondary does not see the primary with split core ?
Regards
Keith

@Captain,

The low voltage and high current may account for the 'noise' through vibration the trafo laminations. Thinking along the lines of 'its so simple you'll laugh' and continuing to wildly speculate, maybe he is DC biasing the  low resistance array of paralleled lamps from the rectified low voltage, output of the trafo and at the same time applying HV / HF from a trafo in the tin can via a cap into the DC loop??

[a.king21]

It looks to me as if it could have been completely re-wound with thick wire. Is he somehow mixing low voltage, high current with high voltage generated in the tin can??

Keep thinking and speculating. 

Yes, that will work. It's pure Benitez 1915. ie the mixing of high frequency/voltage with low voltage high current.


Spot on.
The tin can has got to contain a 3 plate capacitor. You can see the remainder of the material it's made from popping out of the tin. It's in his patent. In this particular patent he uses points as a spark gap to feed the 3 plate cap, which is actually a circular cap. It's in his schematic as a 3 plate capacitor. The high voltage is generated by the spark gap on this occasion. (Unlike aquarium2 where the spark gap is used as a lightning arrestor to prevent overload from excessive feed back.) He's also put an on-off switch linked to a solenoid in the can to save space.


So Kapanadze has 2 patent types.
1 Use the spark gap as a high frequency/voltage generator (2004 video)
2 Use an electronic hf/hv generator and use the spark gap as an overload protector. (Aquarium 2)
The principle is the same in both. I've just analysed Akula - a simplified schematic I have, and he uses the same principle.
Akula uses rectified ac  (ie pulsed dc) mixed  by hf generated by   2  igbts  to do the same job.
We're almost there.

[magpwr]

Thinking ...

Who has considered that patent as relevant? Kapanadze himself? Or rather the patent attorney who had no idea how the Kapanadze device really works?

I would rather consider as relevant the following sentence written by Nikola Tesla: A characteristic feature of the engine was that the work-performing piston was not connected with anything else, but was perfectly free to vibrate at an enormous rate.

A »work-performing piston« translates to »pumping action«, »vibrate at an enormous rate« translates to »high frequency« and »not connected with anything else« translates to »not much energy needed in order to vibrate«. That all would fit an oscillator that opens and closes electronically a Faraday cage. The latter translates vice versa to »placing in the lake a tank«.

Hence, did Tesla really ever built such a mechanical oscillator? How can a mechanical piston do work while not being connected with anything? Tesla was a man of electricity. Why should he waste his time with such a pure mechanical machinery? Or did he use this description just as a metaphor to disguise his real invention, namely the fuelless electric generator?

Keep thinking ...

hi,

Telsa did invent A/C motor some time after generating A/C power.