Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[a.king21]

I did not save it but I remember that it was on rutube.ru

What is therefore a replication of the Hendershot device as detailed in the video? - or did they have their own variation?

[verpies]

...you not reading my note  at the very bottom that this article "I'm still working on it"
I give up finishing this article

I was not the one who who quoted you (see quote below "Verpies: quotes Wesley" in your previous post).
Yes, I saw your red note "I'm still working on it" at the bottom of your post.

[Khwartz]

So let's define these conceptual errors so we have something concrete to discuss:

I claim that space (and time) of our daily lives are just geometric reference systems and their only properties are magnitude and direction. 

You on the other hand, seem to claim (and correct me if I'm wrong) that space is a 3D container that envelops us all and is endowed with myriad of properties, such as permittivity and permeability and is filled with something called Aether that acts as a fluid or gas and has the following properties (list them) needed to support propagation of light between atoms as waves.  You do not address the properties of time at all, other than its one-dimensional nature. 
Most likely you think that time represents one dimension of some 4D continuum, while space represents three dimensions of the same continuum.

I realize that I'm putting a lot of words in your proverbial mouth but this is to provoke you to revise the paragraph above according to your framework of understanding the physical universe.
Much groundwork would need to be covered first.
Read this with a rigorous understanding and follow the links in it (even if it takes you a week), but remember that this is not my framework. 
While I agree with most of Mathis' conclusions, my framework is much more fundamental because it addresses the composition of charge, photons as well as the nature of space and time (Mathis' framework does not).

I'm starting with somebody's else's framework because you have mentioned Dirac's concepts and they need to be addressed first (Mathis addresses legacy concepts much better than I) before we jump into the more fundamental framework of mine. 
As a teaser of what's coming when we get to it - I will ask you a simple question:
What is "motion" and what are the units of it?

P.S.
Let's create another thread for such discussions before we upset people here with this off-topic stuff.

Hi dear Verpies!

Very thanks for your answer and the very rigourous and constructive approach looks to me you take.

I will open soon the new thread where I will probably paste our former posts here on the subject so that the discussion could be understood from its beginning, and let you know. I will take too the necessary time to study the material you gave me. And yes, I do understand your way to put in my mouth words so I could react and so specifying my point of view.

Thanks for the opportunity you give me to discuss this very fundamental subject.

Cheers, Khwartz.

PS: did you have look on my suggested schematic-test for possible EM pumping effect?

[d3x0r]

I have to think how to  express myself in shorter  format as some of  you guys  skip my work by laziness or by being  impatient


Wesley

Please don't increase brevity   But it is hard here, I'm often afraid if I spend too much time writing a response, the forum will time me out and I'll lose all the work... 

[dllabarre]

I have to think how to  express myself in shorter  format as some of  you guys  skip my work by laziness or by being  impatient


Wesley

« Last Edit: Today at 01:59:16 PM by stivep »

For me the long post is NOT a problem.


For me the problem is when you keep going back and adding more & more information to old posts.
If I don't happen to go back and see it I (and others I'm sure) miss out on the new information you added to the old post.


It's OK to add a new post with the new information so we all get to see it.   
DonL