Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[qwekw]

translate from chinese

http://imageshack.us/g/1/10423591/

[qwekw]

patent of resonant power amplifier

[captainkt]

@MenofFather, thanks for the info.

Regards
Keith

[Zeitmaschine]

Since not much is going on here lately there is a bit time to take a quick theoretical look at resonant LC circuits. Wikipedia:

»The parallel LC circuit connected in series with a load will act as band-stop filter having infinite impedance at the resonant frequency of the LC circuit.«

»... the series LC circuit, when connected in series with a load, will act as a band-pass filter having zero impedance at the resonant frequency of the LC circuit.«

Hence, according to the textbooks, at the resonant frequency the parallel LC circuit has an infinite impedance (high ohmic) whereas the series LC circuit has a (almost) zero impedance (like a wire). But why just zero? When the parallel LC circuit can go to infinite high impedance at resonance then why can the series LC circuit not likewise go to infinite low (negative) impedance at resonance but to zero only?

Lower impedance than zero would mean a negative resistance. A negative resistance (e.g. -10 Ohms) would mean the resistor acts as a power source instead of a resistor.

Wikipedia: »For negative resistance to be present there must be active components in the circuit providing a source of energy.«

Yes. But could that mean that the impedance of a resonant series LC circuit would actually like to go below zero (to infinite negative impedance) if it only would have the chance to get in touching distance with a source of energy?

The theory therefore (at resonance): parallel LC circuit = infinite positive impedance, series LC circuit = infinite negative impedance

Sounds somewhat logical that theory, doesn't it?

P.S.: Will see how quickly this subject gets buried here by totally unrelated stuff.

[Grumage]

Since not much is going on here lately there is a bit time to take a quick theoretical look at resonant LC circuits. Wikipedia:

»The parallel LC circuit connected in series with a load will act as band-stop filter having infinite impedance at the resonant frequency of the LC circuit.«

»... the series LC circuit, when connected in series with a load, will act as a band-pass filter having zero impedance at the resonant frequency of the LC circuit.«

Hence, according to the textbooks, at the resonant frequency the parallel LC circuit has an infinite impedance (high ohmic) whereas the series LC circuit has a (almost) zero impedance (like a wire). But why just zero? When the parallel LC circuit can go to infinite high impedance at resonance then why can the series LC circuit not likewise go to infinite low (negative) impedance at resonance but to zero only?

Lower impedance than zero would mean a negative resistance. A negative resistance (e.g. -10 Ohms) would mean the resistor acts as a power source instead of a resistor.

Wikipedia: »For negative resistance to be present there must be active components in the circuit providing a source of energy.«

Yes. But could that mean that the impedance of a resonant series LC circuit would actually like to go below zero (to infinite negative impedance) if it only would have the chance to get in touching distance with a source of energy?

The theory therefore (at resonance): parallel LC circuit = infinite positive impedance, series LC circuit = infinite negative impedance

Sounds somewhat logical that theory, doesn't it?

P.S.: Will see how quickly this subject gets buried here by totally unrelated stuff.

Dear Zeitmaschine.

What if ??

Cheers Grum.