Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[gigitonggos]

@Grumage & @ All who have tried to make replica of kapanadze/sr 193 devices .
HAVE YOU ALL TRIED SHORTER WIRE FOR COIL L2? .
L2 = 7 TO 20 TURN WINDING CW
L2 is coil for 50 Hz Generator also "ACT" DC to AC.
remember to have GOOD GROUNDING .
L1 = CW- high voltage
L3 = CW- output voltage coil

To ONE's who doesn't affraid MIB , please make this devices OPENSOURCE.thank's

[elementSix]

Tesla Fine Tuning.  Your guess is better than mine..
It is a well known fact that every circuit provided its ohmic resistance does not exceed certain definite limits, has a period of vibration of its own analogous to the period of vibration of a weighted spring. In order to alternately charge a given circuit of this character by periodic impulses impressed upon it and to discharge it most effectively, the frequency of the impressed impulses should bear a definite relation to the frequency of the vibrations possessed by the circuit itself. Moreover, for like reasons the period of vibration of the discharge-circuit should bear a similar relation to the impressed impulses or the charging-circuit. When the conditions are such that the general law of harmonic vibrations is followed, the circuits are said to be in resonance or in electromagnetic synchronicity, and this condition I have found in my system to be highly advantageous. Hence in practice I adjust the electrical constants of the circuits so that in normal operation this condition of resonance is approximately obtained. To accomplish this, the number of impulses of current directed into the charging-circuit per unit of time is made equal to the period of the charging of the charging circuit itself, or generally, to a harmonic thereof, and the same relations are maintained between the charging and discharge circuit. Any departure from this condition will result in a decreased output, and this fact I take advantage of in regulating such output by varying the frequencies of the impulses or vibrations in several circuits. Inasmuch as the period of any given circuit depends upon the relations of its resistance, self induction, and capacity, a variation of any one or more of these may result in a variation in its period.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Tesla_dc_thermoelectric_coils

[stivep]

Wesley News:part #7 Vasmus Free Energy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBMxQRTm1B0




Wesley

[Zeitmaschine]

Nice entertainment. Now the sequel should explain the principle of work. I'm looking forward to it.

[jbignes5]

Indeed this is a good article.

IMO the most significant quote is this bolded one:
"A very interesting phenomenon exists when we draw current from the secondary. Since the primary current increases to supply the load, we would expect that the magnetic flux in the core would also increase (more amps, same number of turns, more flux). In fact, the flux density decreases!  In a perfect transformer with no copper loss, the flux would remain the same".

Indeed, at its ideal extreme, the action of the secondary winding is to maintain (freeze) the magnetic flux in the core at a constant level.
Many people do not understand the Lenz Law and falsely think that the current flowing in the secondary winding increases (or decreases) the magnetic flux in transformer's core.

I saw in the text that you were quoting, that you were replying to Jbignes5. 
His ideas about adding voltage to an existing current flow in order to increase power are nonsense, however his questions about the the influence of varying magnetic flux confined to a ferromagnetic core, on a winding outside of that core, have merit.  If you take abstract concepts such as "the magnetic field" and "the electric field" for granted, without mechanistic explanation of their origin, then the Maxwell's or Faraday's Laws of induction suffice to explain the relationship between them*, but that is not a mechanistic explanation.  Jbignes5 is doomed to fail in finding such physical answer because he starts with an "electric field" as an abstract non-mechanistic axiom without consideration what it really is.  Just like so many others, he just writes "electric field" and is done with it.

* Those two laws do not explain the AB Effect.

As for the comment of I just use electric field as a buzz word. Well to be honest I have described my many views on that concept. Since we can not see the electric field besides what we can see from super excitation HV Brush Effects well like I have explained many many times before.


Here it goes again. My current understanding of the electric field is this. It is very dynamic. It has Geometry intrinsically tied to it. Simply because to have a potential difference in space x to space y  you must have an electric line. This line is a very low level excited pathway of statically attracted particles. These particles are from the very space itself. They can move instantly because since there are so many of them they have zero time to orient a pathway due to local density along the lines. The two point charges do have a base range or radiative bubble around the point source. Once it contacts another bubble it instantly forms a line and connects to the next.


The structure of the particles would have to be the most basic of all geometries. A Tetrahedron fits the bill here. Since we can model so life like on computers with the graphics we have learned the power of the triangle. I even went as far as to show how polarity could happen with more massive charge groups.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle   This is as good of an explanation as any for the smallest scales. You might call these Electrons. I wouldn't but if they were big enough I might. The analogues in higher dimensions section being the polar particles as they would be. One an inverse of the other. One has infinite surface the other, not so much surface. One has mass the other Not so much mass. All neutral versions have little to no charge on them. Now lets imagine the densest material ever thought of Now times that by 1 googla. This fine material is so fine it pours in between atoms. Usually with moderate energy<-Heat. There are so many particles in one cubic centimeter that it boggles the mind to think about how to calculate the density. In any given space it only takes 1 time count for an entire light year to align an electric line. This is because the conductors of the electric energy is the blue pyramid. With the current carrier is of the red pyramid. Think about the validity of this presentation. If there was a big bang, How fine would matter have been obliterated to the finest particles the Universe has ever seen. All capable of transmitting energy through self powered, self guiding shapes such as pictured below. The electric particle is blue because it has huge surfaces that can hold voltage potential. The other current particle is the red one. This has plenty of space from charges.

Now what are charges. Well they are string like masses or writhing worms. Charges are one continuous loop and very pliable and can be increased or decreased by merely being around other charges. Merges and diverges can happen. This changes the size of the strings of much smaller pyramids. The strings look like pearls on a silk string. most likely made of smaller red type pyramids. Most likely full faced solids in the strings. But it could go further down as well. After all fractals never end or begin they just are always evolving. Through fractal studies I bet we could even trace back to any point we so liked to see the fract as it was in the past. Once we know we have the fractal key it would be easy for us to roll the fractal back and see it as it was or for that fact how it will be.

Yes some of my ideas are not quite on the mark but at least I have some ideas of what it is we missed. I have thought long and hard about this process. I have read from both sides of the fence and this view makes more sense then anything else that has been proposed. Contrary to popular belief Tesla didn't know it all about this stuff. He was experimenting to figure it out as far as he could. He also said that we were the ones to pick up the mantle and do the rest of the work that is needed to fully understand this stuff.

P.S. If you goto the wiki and click the picture on that page you can even get a better resolution picture of these two particles. Make sure you look at each type very closely, you will see the difference pretty quickly I bet. These move with static laws so see if you can figure out how this work. The charges are merely riding in these structures.