Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[a.king21]

Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.

[From other Planet]

here is another schematic posted by user v8carlo, didnt try this one yet... compare with kapanadze picture... could it be same circuit?

[forest]

Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.

I'm not so sure. I think it's just LCR resonance but R is minimal and it's actually free resonance, not forced. Tesla had given one strict hint about that...

[jbignes5]

Zeitmaschine: That quote was before I got into TK's face.
He uses make-break technique.
I told him that and he said, "Well what do you need me for?"
Same as Tito L Oracion, except Tito's stuck with the Tesla
controller.
We're all making too hard work of it.
So keep it simple.
Tesla's radiant energy and Tesla's circuit controllers.
It's all just make-break.
Let's not be side-tracked.
Tesla's magnifying RECEIVER is what I'm looking at.
Tesla's resonance has nothing to do with LCR resonance.

There are many kind of resonances. One of vibrational period for example. One of impedance and one of mass. All these resonances deal with vibrations of some kind.


With mass it tends to get tricky but since there is sooo much of mass then why would it mater. Well Lets think about the tuning fork and mutual oscillations. Lets also think about the shape of the mass. Is it subdivided? As with a tuning fork if you change the geometry of the matter does this effect it's own resonant frequency? Yes but maybe in more subtle ways.


When Tesla started to mess with the subdivided coils and geometry He figured out that objects like conical shapes really focused the field around it. He said that the sound of the brush like emission was wind like. When trying to measure the current through the conical coil in the e-field, that there was zero current in the coil. But the speed of the oscillator was most likely in the millions of impulses per second. Tesla concidered 1 million to be a moderate frequency or period. MODERATE.


I got to pull up the notes from his experimenting with this stuff again. He said it reacted quite energetically when metal objects approached the exciter coil. Aluminum foil was vaporized in a flash. It's matter was not sufficiently dense enough for it to stay together. The static forces that built up in it's structure ripped it apart most violently. But like I said I got to find the notes again.


Tesla like to deal in the extremes and did little in the lower power versions. He was thinking of a grand scheme for his new system and bigger was better coverage. I am sure this principle works even down to the smallest of scales.


Let me go find the notes.. Think it was in the Book.. Secrets of cold war technology.

[a.king21]

Yes and no. The Tesla resonance I am referring to is the Magnifying transmitter free coil as per colorado springs.
Of course Tesla knew about tuning because he invented it. But tuning was also to individualize the receiver.
Tuning was also to grab harmonics, but the main one was the free coil which self resonated like a bell. If the bell was tuned to middle C it didn't matter how many times you hit it. It was always middle C.