Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[MenofFather]

Hi for All

I watching Wesleys last Dalys video and thinking on Kapanadzes first device what able 5 kW output, approximetly devices size is same, quesion is what is matter if we want enlarge the output? more precise find the NMR (ESR)? put ferrite to the transformer? or what?

regards zcsaba

Maybe needsinchronsation. Daly divice not have sinchronisation and maybe L1, L2 wires must be ticker and renquenies higher.

[stivep]

Response from Wesley:

Skip all of the videos  below , or watch it with  caution.


"

"""""""""And the Vasant Corporation is back. aerospace electronics engineer, George J. Bugh who is selling his book.. on spinwaves on ESR . link below... I have bought his book on amazon..
http://vasantcorporation.com/

George J. Bugh videos on spinwaves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkOuGRU8akA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjsL1zfmKvA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=craHcstJJZ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izlcZPUMkdA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDEtPGB13NM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEMFqOvViDg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge4Ni3ke2I8
[/font]

I went through that set of videos:
Unfortunately  George J. Bugh  is in science not recognized and has possibly reputation of renegade.
I have also another opinion, of very brilliant  and very much traditional scientist I value so much.
He is skeptic, and good in what he is talking about.




He find these to be Pseudo-Scientific treatises .
Field of Physics 30 years ago, is not what is to be compared to  of today times.
He has his   "Eureka! Moment " but his scientific jargon to make his day dreams only sound BRILLIANT , however is not real in minds of official science/


So the question would be who is wrong.



That might be  very finely tuned "bull-shit"  you risk falling down one, of these sad men's "rabbit hole .And he might not even know about it.
He might be just a believer  of what he says,
or he might be just on the verge of something,  but there  is no way for myself to make any  sense of his lectures.


Personally I wish that he is right, but he did not deliver strong foundation to support it.


There is strong point of my friend scientist  that: most new exciting theories that succeed are postulated by guys in their twenties, not their 70's Planck Einstein, Bohr, Schrödinger,

Something of exceptional value  for him and for me as well , is String Theory, Super Symmetry, Stephen Hawking's work on Black Holes.  Not guys that can't grasp any idea from the last 100 years and re-discover discredited theories from the 19th century.


That is quote of  my scientific colleague :

Electrons cannot be accurately defined in classical mechanics notions of Physics and are Quantum Mechanical objects which behave unlike classical physical objects (planets, etc.).
This "Person in question"  doesn't seem to understand how electrons fill orbitals.
Iron's valence electrons exist in their 3d orbitals.
d orbitals contain 5 sub orbitals which progressively fill with unpaired electrons until the sixth electron occupies one of the half-filled 3d orbitals leaving 4 3d sub orbitals half-filled containing unbalanced non zero net spins (the four electrons do NOT pair up and balance their spin states even in their ground state).
His explanation of why crystallized iron is ferromagnetic is erroneous. (By the way, iron exists in many different allotropic states, depending on the surrounding temperature and pressure.
In some allotropic states Iron is Ferromagnetic (below its Curie point), BUT in other allotropic states (gamma iron=Austenite, or delta iron) Iron is not magnetic.
In fact due to the stabilizing coupling effect (which I've written about before) very small individual crystalline grains which are pressed together in an amorphous structure we recognize as metallic iron, if formed below their Curie point are already aligned magnetically. 
The problem is each grain is oriented in a random direction and the collection of metallic grain's magnetic moment cancels out on a statistical basis unless they are aligned by an external magnetic field.

I do not deny any theory at all but As of today I might just not fully understand many things around me.
Any theory is just a model.
Based on that model we make science.
The more comfortable is the model the more chance it has to be applied to fundamental physic.
Model  changes periodically but that takes another model to be able to replace the first one.




At the end we all must  hold to any model that work for us.


The science might be wrong in many areas due to misunderstanding the phenomena or political agenda of some of entities .
and that is to be find out  yet.








Wesley

[wattsup]

So the question would be who is wrong.
Wesley

Both!!!

wattsup

PS1: Sorry for posting. I promised I would never post on this thread again but I could not help myself.
Maybe, for a change I can add "Sorry for short post". hahaha

PS2: Wes, just a little note on the many great videos you have done in the recent past, I think in the future if you talked a little slower and pronounced the words clearer it will help all those who have a limited grasp of the English language. But please do not stop as they are useful videos.

[stivep]

Both!!!

wattsup

PS1: Sorry for posting. I promised I would never post on this thread again but I could not help myself.
Maybe, for a change I can add "Sorry for short post". hahaha

PS2: Wes, just a little note on the many great videos you have done in the recent past, I think in the future if you talked a little slower and pronounced the words clearer it will help all those who have a limited grasp of the English language. But please do not stop as they are useful videos.

Thank you mu friend very much for your advice.


I will




Wesley

[Jeg]

Dear Wesley
Many times I watch your videos and I learn things from your marvelous work, but I never said thanks to you cause I take it for granted while its not. So thanks for what you are doing, I/we appreciate it!

In relation with Daly's coil, which is the one with the many turns Tesla like thin wire coil? L1 L2 or L4 ?


Jeg