Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

Roberto:

Hi Wesley,
1 -  I just started reading paper you kindly shared. I've been for more than 30 years a licensed Radio Amateur (i0LY).
So, even if the power considerations made are theoretically correct...
I've never seen any kind of usable power coming from an unbalanced transmission wave! 
what happens is direct conversion mainly into heath....as predicted ....


2 - Few years agò I tested a complex ONE TO MANY TMT system (1 x transmitter and 6x receivers) just to check existance of possible power multiplication at the combined receivers end.  Even if I noted some interesting facts...I failed to obtain in output more energy than the supplied input.


----I continue to read the article....

Note in the  article:
-first force is  the force that we create by our-self and introduce to the system
-second force is the force in NEAR FIELD that  is induced in the secondary winding of  transformer. that source is only  serving a source to   any other devices connected to it.
However  that is not the source in relation to primary force. It is only force that   was created by the first one.
- third force  is an independent force that is "pushed" to work for our benefit like horse   for the farmer





Unfortunate is for OU  community  that I   very much  agree with you.


The advantage of photon  radiation in  microwave region is  only when in NEAR FIELD  coupling  rate  of change , of  magnetic component of electromagnetic force, is able to induce something or anything in  secondary winding.( of the transformer) There is no gain proved to be  available for us  from that  arrangement.

As always  the voltage is  increased with current dropping  down  so that transfer is at no gain.
We need   "third  source"- /force that is being activated by the  primary force and  than stimulated   to the point where  under first force  influence,
- the power drown by the load is solely  coming from the third source 
That force is the one that is not being  charged  for-( does not cost us money)


Microwave region of frequencies  - has insufficient energy per photon to
interact with the matter,  other  than  being converted to  heat.


Wave-guides DO NOT serve as photon  summarizes. Photons  can not interact with themselves nor accumulate their own energy nor see  each other.
They have no idea how many photons  of the same or different  properties  is  there  exactly on their path., Photon of particular wave length   can interact only with suitable resonators of the same  wavelengths of its ½, ¼  and so on.


I see OU that is useful for us as No OU in reality.
e.g Tubing  used to  suck with your mouth , gasoline from the car tank  uses only one short  under pressure    impulse  and the rest of the flow  is done with gravity ( at the condition of  gravity dis-balance between the two tanks.
That serves as the example of  "third force"= gravity.


======================================
e.g. stimulating force of the hand  opening the valve  of the water  pipe is  small.
Comparing to water flow  paid  by a river.


When we leave classical mechanics  and go to the quantum world the same mechanism must be present.


So  I'm asking you if there is something in that paper that I simply did not noticed.


I read  so much of material and  it is  impossible to    make suitable analysis all the time.


Wesley

[Meta]

"And is why meta-physics should be included and not excluded from our discussion.  Right? Meta?

_________________________________________________________________

Yes, that's why my name is Meta.
It means "over and above" physics.
That which controls physics.
The hidden world.

Now NickZ is asking questions I can only take as needing an answer so I will.

What is light?

Packets, I hear, however I did make a hypothetical advance and say that light, "travels" in 2 opposite directions just like DNA spirals in 2 opposite directions so faster-than-light travel can be explained easily, seeing that the detectors are only detecting the returning packets, at the velocity of light. "Traveling" here, means more like communicating rather than moving. It seems the matrix of deep space communicates at the velocity of light.

And light or, technically, its energy, already pervades all of space but unless lights energy touches mass of any kind, it will not radiate its light unless reflected off the mass. In deep space there is lights energy but there's nothing to reflect it so we can't see it. Technically there's 1 electron per cubic foot of deep space.

[Meta]

verpies,

A "dimension" is defined by all of Science, as "a 90 degree rotation of an electron". Meta

Not strictly - a dimension is just an independent variable.

Of course in geometric systems, 90º symbolizes that independence, e.g. as in a perpendicular motion.

BTW: Any motion is a ratio of space to time.

____________________________________________________________

Let me ask you how you can demonstrate your claims without using more words. Do you have some kind of documented evidence? When we make claims we should be able to back them.

Define Independent variable. What creates it?

"BTW: Any motion is a ratio of space to time."

What does that mean?  You can only use more words to describe these words.

[Meta]

acca,

Kapanadze's device doesn't seem to have any antenna to pick up the spatial potential like a Moray device or Tesla's Black Box powering his car. I think Moray and Tesla used a series of step down transformers to bring the extremely high spatial potential down to usable levels.

[stivep]

Word: Meta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta
If there is no practicality  fallowing theory in any field than any  equivalent or substitution to theory  newly introduced is worth nothing.
At first it is only  concept  that has not been fallowed in modern times
Second even if that concept of perceptual processing  is really right way to go it  does not have push to rewrite science as we know,


I'm not denying nor protesting Meta involvement in this forum.
I'm not able to take any benefit  from  it.
the simple way to  explain it is that I  have the same comfort of going on  like Meta has  with his new form of processing  information.
At the end if it is proven that Meta was right  it would not give me any harm. 
If it is proven that Meta is wrong that would not be any revolution.


Definitely I do not see it as a conflict.
If you get somewhere where solid solution is  proposed - Meta  just share it,
I can admit that in "your world" I'm completely lost.
I'm in physics not metaphysics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

Metaphysical Cosmology is the branch of metaphysics that deals with the world as the totality of all phenomena in space and time. Historically, it has had quite a broad scope, and in many cases was founded in religion. The ancient Greeks drew no distinction between this use and their model for the cosmos. However, in modern times it addresses questions about the Universe which are beyond the scope of the physical sciences. It is distinguished from religious cosmology in that it approaches these questions using philosophical methods (e.g. dialectics).

With all due respects to all believers.


do not drag me there...
This is for me unacceptable form  of  wasting my time.
Charlatans have been working hard to  their own benefit based on facts that are  mixed together  fights with dragons and holly wars, killings  punishments an angels with swords .
And than even if one person is trying to clarify  that branch of science and place it as valuable tool - first it must be taken out of the trash and washed  out from all of the dirt.
And I see it as next to impossible. 



I wish you the best.

Wesley