The Abundance Paradigm

[Amaterasu]

I found serious flaw in the abundance paradigm, which is disregard of desires of human being is relative and can not be quantized.

Applying nao technologies on biosphere for enhancement of food production is as dangerous as the toxic chemicals and GM foods.

I believe in free energy devices should be released to free mankind out of poverty and miserable living condition. But, there is liable issue of free energy device itself because of insecure human nature.  National security is end of story.

We need to overhaul the dirty political system, the management of government. Democratic is dead. Many nations became totalitarion regimes backup by corporations. 

I hope all nations stop the freaking wars and threats once and for all. It's so pathetic.

I'm at a loss...  "Quantized?"  If you examine the paradigm, you will see that, in exact oposite of "quantized," the Conscious spark is given a full field of experience to choose, with choices evaluated by how these sparks measure to the three true laws, to experience with whatever 24 times per second dip into this Universe that they find they are granted.

So please...  Elaborate on this flaw of "quantisization" that you have found.  Maybe I missed something.

Thanks.

EDIT to add:  Because They instigate wars and then supply both sides...  Hoping we will just stop it is too short a measure.  That is why I wrote the book.  We need a complete undermining of Their control device:  Money/energy (money, in the final analysis is merely and accounting of energy).

[Amaterasu]

And do you that our current desires are true in nature or have been imposed on us since birth?

In any case there is certainly no danger in having robots containing the latest available technology (nano or whatever) working the land for us, creating housing, service, etc etc etc. Possibilities are only limited by our current imagination.

I am sure in time we will grow our intellect as we should have done before we were placed in this control grid.

@Skywatcher:Net neutrality is nothing more than censorship. I am sure the PTB would love to restrict the Internet and prevent "alternative" information from spreading. Guess what Baron de Rothschild and Mr David Rockefeller?

You will fail epically.

To add a message to all the hybrids: co-exist or get the hell off the planet.

As far as robots are concerned, in an abundance paradigm, there is no reason to have proprietary software.  Things are programmed open source, and when one's program is accoladed and selected by others for use, one is honored.

And with open source comes safety.  There will be no back doors.  And any who choose proprietary software do so in agreement with the "proprietor" and the acceptor.  No one's business but theirs, and they accept the risks.

Anyway, open interweb, open source, open discussion, open efforts.  Open information flow.

No flaws, despite contentions.  [smile]

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, great comments. I agree the use of fiat (fake) money or any money for that matter has to be phased out. I see money, whether fake or not, as a vehicle or tool to interfere with human exchange. It is not and was never needed, except in the minds of those that wish to control and dominate others lives. So yes i agree its energy but thought I would explain it a little further for you.
peace love light 

[Amaterasu]

Hi folks, great comments. I agree the use of fiat (fake) money or any money for that matter has to be phased out. I see money, whether fake or not, as a vehicle or tool to interfere with human exchange. It is not and was never needed, except in the minds of those that wish to control and dominate others lives. So yes i agree its energy but thought I would explain it a little further for you.
peace love light 

[smile]  I have been in the lower ranks of the banking system.  I have watched the daily operation of money.  I have a good grasp of the function of the power the numbers which represent "worth" have on our global society.  I see clearly the essence of what fiat money is and how it relates to what goes on from the scale of the street up unto the ivory towers of those operating the game.  But whether it is back-breaking efforts of people in the fields, to the clerical tasks to the creative efforts, to the fuel to burn running our machines, the money represents the energy we can extract: expended, traded, distributed, grown - whatever form that energy takes.

But if energy is abundant, we no longer need to account for it.  And that's why money in abundance is moot.

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, Hi Amaterasu, thanks for the replies. I agree that to some extent money represents an energy, but in my opinion is more like a vehicle or a catalyst to the real energy, ie. labor, food, fuel, etc. which provides for humanity albeit up to this point in a limited way. And yes energy like electricity in abundance would almost negate the need for money. The only problem I have with viewing money as energy is it assumes a constant of equality, as an example, say we have 100 watts powering a light bulb, that bulb will always light at the 100 watt level If fed 100 watts. Now as you may already know with fiat or ( fake ) money that 100 watts can be manipulated to give much less over time which relates directly to a clever form of slavery and also money that is backed by precious metals can have these dangers as well due to profit, greed, etc. all the things your pointing out. Hope that helps to explain my view a little better.
peace love light