Light is converted gravity

[newbie123]

Prove it wrong, instead of just stating it as being wrong.

According to wikipedia a transverse wave is oscillating up and down perpendicular to the direction of energy transfer or the direction of travel.  Plot this in 3D and it will have a corkscrew motion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transverse_waves

You're the one who is spreading misinformation due to denying or not understanding the truth.

Besides, a positive or truth can't be proven.  <<---That's more philosophy for you.

Just show me one respectable link that says transverse waves (or EM waves)  are "corkscrews" ...   Did you even think about post #27 ?

[brian334]

IotaYodi says:
You would have to consider the whole electromagnetic spectrum not just the visible parts.

I agree.
334

[gravityblock]

Just show me one respectable link that says transverse waves (or EM waves)  are "corkscrews" ...   Did you even think about post #27 ?

Yes, I have thought about post #27, but #27 doesn't seem to apply to yourself, it only applies to me.  LOL

The wikipedia link I give you about transverse waves, says if you have a clockwise/counter-clockwise motion then you will create a helical wave.  Helical and corkscrew are the same thing in this context.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew

The thing to remember is you have two transverse waves in the EM.  One from the electrical and one from the magnetic.  These waves are perpendicular to each other.  One wave is up/down, and the other wave is left/right.  This creates a corkscrew or helical motion in the direction of travel. 

[newbie123]

Yes, I have thought about post #27, but #27 doesn't seem to apply to yourself, it only applies to me.  LOL

Wrong. You are the one making extraordinary claims here, not me...    If you weren't making an extraordinary claim.. it would be very easy to find a link on the web that says EM waves travel in a corkscrew like motion..    Right?     Well, I haven't been able to find any..  But I can show you many links that say photons travel as transverse waves.. NOT corkscrews.. Lol..

Here for example,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation


Now if you apply philosophy to this concept, and say photons (in some other dimension perhaps) are "spinning" because they have quantum spin..   Maybe you really have transverse waves actually spinning.. Which would be a corkscrew like feature...

But this isn't physics.. It's philosophy (right now).

[gravityblock]

Wrong. You are the one making extraordinary claims here, not me...    If you weren't making an extraordinary claim.. it would be very easy to find a link on the web that says EM waves travel in a corkscrew like motion..    Right?     Well, I haven't been able to find any..  But I can show you many links that say photons travel as transverse waves.. NOT corkscrews.. Lol..

Here for example,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

There are two waves associated with a photon traveling through space.  One wave is from the electric field and the other wave is from the magnetic field.  They are perpendicular to each other, thus causing a corkscrew or helical motion when their paths are plotted together.  Plot their paths separately, then they will appear as two transverse waves, one from the electric field and one from the magnetic field.  A moving charge creates a magnetic field and a changing magnetic field creates an electric field.  They are tied together and are not separate, thus both transverse waves are tied together which creates a corkscrew or helical motion in the direction of energy transfer.  This helical motion or waves are responsible for gravity.  We can only detect the transverse waves individually.  The two transverse waves combined causes space-time to be curved, which gives us the affects of gravity.  They are combined, cause you can't have one without the other.

Since they haven't unified gravity with the other forces of nature, then I doubt you will find a good reference for this.  I say a reference is not needed because it is logical and common sense.  The references are there, they just need to be pieced together with common sense.

I don't need reference materials from someone else, when it is just common sense.