Light is converted gravity

[gravityblock]

GB,

Where are you getting your information exactly? Seriously...    Your information is so flawed it's not even funny.



What is this crap?     Gamma rays will NOT  "travel more space due to making more turns in their corkscrew motion as compared to a radio wave" ...      This single sentence is full of misinformation....         Corkscrew motion?  Did you make this up?        RF waves and gamma rays travel the same linear distance, true..  But  IF there is a difference in their tangential distance,  don't you think the shorter wave (high energy) photon would have less distance to travel?

Do you even understand (or care)  that main stream physics considers EM waves as transverse waves?  Not a "corkscrew motion"?   Do you understand that RF waves are longer than gamma?

This analogy has nothing to do with EM waves..

Relativity is based on this??     Really, now....

Transverse and corkscrew are the same thing.  Transverse waves are oscillating up and down perpendicular to the direction of travel.  If you plot it on a 2D surface, then it will have a wave motion that is up and down with a line going through the middle.  When you plot it in 3D, then you can see how it has a corkscrew motion.

This is another thing.  Teaching something that is 3D or 4D in nature and plotting in on a 2D surface doesn't work very well.

Radio waves have a lower frequency with a longer wavelength, than a gamma ray.  This is true, but the amplitude is greater or higher with a radio wave, meaning it will make less turns, thus moving in a straighter line.

If you stretched out their up and down distances as they travel with their forward distances, then you will see that the gamma rays do travel more space and more distance than a radio wave and has a greater overall speed, but their linear speeds are the same.

You keep thinking and learning in 2D, and I will think and learn in 3D and 4D.

[gravityblock]

Give me a break dude..    Everything thing you've said here is completely retarded.


Just show me proof that Military physics books have "better terminology"  and "less errors" than universities...

You're starting with personal attacks now.  Why don't you find the proof for yourself, instead of asking everyone else to prove something for you.  I'm not going to do your work for you.

I could care less what you think, it is obvious that the military has knowledge that isn't being taught in the universities.  Believe what you want, it will not change what they know.

[newbie123]

You're starting with personal attacks now. 

Sorry, I can only take so much bull shit...

Why don't you find the proof for yourself, instead of asking everyone else to prove something for you.  I'm not going to do your work for you.

That isn't how it works!!  If you claim something as a fact, you need to be able to support it with references (proof), NOT the other way around.

Think about it...   

Here's an example,

Someone could claim they have a 100 lb frog in their backyard...     Then say to a skeptic  "Prove that I don't  have a huge 100 lb  frog in my backyard"...     without even giving an address/city, video, pictures, etc...     This is essentially what you are doing  and it's completely idiotic....

[newbie123]

Transverse and corkscrew are the same thing. 

Wrong again!


If you want to speculate (aka Philosophy)  that's fine, but make it clear that you're doing so..   (unless you like spreading misinformation)

[gravityblock]

Wrong again!

Prove it wrong, instead of just stating it as being wrong.

According to wikipedia a transverse wave is oscillating up and down perpendicular to the direction of energy transfer or the direction of travel.  Plot this in 3D and it will have a corkscrew motion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transverse_waves

You're the one who is spreading misinformation due to denying or not understanding the truth.

Besides, a positive or truth can't be proven.  <<---That's more philosophy for you.