A new Apollo Moon Landing Conspiracy Emerges !!

[EMdevices]

Asymetric,   

I've also heard of people listening to signals coming from the direction of the moon during the Apollo missions (HAM radio folks) but that does not mean much.  Look at this link about bouncing signals off the moon, a technique invented by the military in WWII.     

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EME_(communications)

Also, seeing and tracking visualy something that is going to the moon does not mean there are people on board.  Prior to the Apollo missions we had already placed a few things on the surface of the moon. (I think a Surveryor craft is photographed by one of the Apollo missions)

Also,  I failed to point out that the two images just released from NASA, (Apollo 11, and Apollo 14) differ from one another.  Look at the shadows and how different they are, compare the length, width, relative to the object that makes the shadow etc...

Before these images came out, my theory has been that we went to the moon on later missions, but we faked the first to buy us time.  And once you fake one, you get to the moon and realize you have to fake all the others to STAY CONSISTENT.     

I'm just raising questions here, not advocating real hard, if we went or didn't go to the Moon.  Just observations, that's all.

EM

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Anyone who doesn't believe that this Humongous Saturn V rocket never went to the moon has something wrong with them.

and then there was Skylab, I watched it fall back to Earth that day then there is the International space station.

these people believe that man could never survive the trip due to radiation well tell that to the Russian cosmonaut living in space in a space station.

I can not believe so many people are that messed up, most are totally confused.

Cheeri'O
Jerry

[TechStuf]

I can not believe so many people are that messed up, most are totally confused.

LOL.....you are absolutely right.


So confused that we too would probably tape over stacks and stacks of ORIGINAL apollo moon footage like nasa says it did....if given the opportunity.


LOL.....

[onthecuttingedge2005]

All those people that don't believe can simply study the International Space Station's records and how much radiation exposure the cosmonaut would endure during his/her mission in orbit.

Data collected by NASA and a Russian-Austrian collaboration show that astronauts on the ISS are subjected to about 1 millisievert of radiation per day, about the same as someone would get from natural sources on Earth in a whole year. Spending three months in these conditions translates into about one-tenth the long-term cancer risk incurred by regular smokers.

Despite the years of high-quality research reported in rems and millirems (mrem, 10-3 rem), the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements wants us to give up the rad in favor of the gray (Gy), a unit 100 times larger. Similarly, the rem is to be replaced by the sievert (Sv), again so that 100 rem = 1 Sv. Unfortunately, the rad and rem were already a little large to work with (why the table below is expressed in millirems) and converting to grays and sieverts makes the problem worse. Happily, many workers continue to use the rad and rem, and so shall we. In fact, I will try to express all radiation doses in a single unit, the millirem.

Used to destroy the bone marrow in preparation for a marrow transplant (given over several days)   1,000,000
Approximate lethal dose ("LD50") if no treatment and given to the entire body in a short period   450,000
Causes radiation sickness (when absorbed in a short period)   >100,000
Increase in lifetime dose to most heavily exposed people living near Chernobyl   43,000
Average annual dose (excluding natural background) for medical X-ray technicians   320
Maximum permissible annual dose (excluding natural background and medical exposure) to general public   170
Natural background, Boston, MA, USA (per year)(excluding radon)   102
Natural background, Denver, CO, USA (per year)(excluding radon)   180
Additional annual dose if you live in a brick rather than a wood house   7
Annual dose in some houses in Ramsar, Iran   >13,000
Average dose to person living within 10 miles of Three-Mile Island (TMI) caused by the accident of 28 March 1979   8
Most heavily exposed person (a fisherman) near TMI   <100
Approximate dose received by a person spending 1 year at the fence surrounding a nuclear power station    0.1â€"0.6
Average dose to each person in the U. S. population from nuclear power plants (per year)   0.002
Received by the bone marrow during a set of dental x rays*   9.4
Received by the colon during a barium enema   1,500
Typical chest x ray   2
Received by breast during mammogram   ~300
Dose from a single full-body computed tomography (CT) scan   4,500
When delivered in a single dose, increases the risk of developing cancer by 1%   10,000
Average airline passenger (10 flights/year)   3
Flight crew and cabin attendants (per year)   160
Hourly dose to skin holding piece of the original "Fiesta Ware" (a brand of pottery)   200â€"300
Annual dose to each person in the U. S. population from fallout (former weapons testing plus Chernobyl)   0.06

[TechStuf]

The ISS which orbits BENEATH the Van Allen radiation belt, proves little.  Perhaps after further study, you will point to the 'rooster tails' kicked up by the lunar rover, or other simple demonstration which would have been practically impossible to fake in the late sixties, early seventies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRSpntQ-VtY

Clearly, the fine dust on the lunar surface, if replicated in a studio on earth, would kick up a dust cloud large enough to put the fakers in a fog for quite awhile.  And nobody of sound mind is willing to postulate a vacuum chamber the size of an airliner hanger.

So, there is more than ample proof that man went to the moon.


But alas, when and how exactly, is open to speculation....



It's too bad nasa taped over the original landing tapes by accident.