Tommey Reed's Pulse Generator output test update.

[Tommey Reed]

Thanks for the info, love information.

So when I discharge from the pulse generator, where did the extra energy come from the second cap?

As my test shows using a charge cap to discharge into the pulse generator, at the same time the pulser allow more energy into the second capacitor.

This is the test:
http://www.youtube.com/user/OverUnityNow1#play/all/uploads-all/1/nveNtdrxPbM

The pwm was run on a battery to control the mosfet.
Tom.

[poynt99]

Tom,

In your video you started with 12.92V in one cap and ended up with about 7.7V in each after transfer through your PWM circuit. This is an improvement over direct transfer through a piece of wire where you would get about 6.46V on each.

The 7.7V on each does not show "extra' energy of any kind, but what it does show is less loss. With a piece of wire you lose 50% of the energy, no argument. With an inductor (your PWM circuit including the coil) this gives you less loss, but you are far far from perfect.

7.7V is an improvement, but if you try harder, you will be able to obtain about 8.9V on each cap. If you achieve this, your circuit will be running at about 95% efficiency. Sorry, still no OU.

.99

[Tommey Reed]

Ok, I'll take that. I was showing in my videos that energy from pre charge cap going into another cap was a loss. That's why I said 50% loss of transfer energy.



Tom

[Tito L. Oracion]

Ok, I'll take that. I was showing in my videos that energy from pre charge cap going into another cap was a loss. That's why I said 50% loss of transfer energy.



Tom

Hi tom good day

how did you made your PWM?
i mean how could it last the switching on and off?

God bless
otits 

[captainpecan]

Tom,  Keep experimenting.  Trust me, I've been down the road your on before.  Try putting a small DC motor in series between the caps, and see how much energy it actually uses to do work. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwp7podu06s fun little mind experiment that really get's you thinking!

Long story short, an inductor, and pulses do decrease losses. 99 is right in this respect, like I said, been down that road haven't we 99  .  But it does not mean extra energy is entering the circuit yet unfortunately.  Capacitors are lossy as hell.  But it's when you start realizing you can be get work done, while you retrieve half the energy that you start seeing efficiency climb.  Good luck.