New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[forest]

forest:

i have just gone through Steven Mark TPU for the first time after you mention his name in your post
i couldn't go in details coz its a very long thread but by looking at the circuit diagram i want to give my opinion may be i am wrong

this is high frequency air core transformer with feed back and trying to collect BEMF directly through termination points.
this method will blow MOSFETs and will not give you stable results. this kind of circuit were usually used in transformer coupling radio amplifiers in valve ACDC radios.
in this method all activities are taking place in active zone i really don't know how well it have performed
with my experience you need controlled isolated passive zone for parallel processing of energy collectors. 

I think TPU is rather 1 to 3 active transmitters collecting and converting kicks into continuous current (Tesla method) and 1 to 3 passive receivers - curious transformers which really accelerate small DC bias enlarging current . The same for Hubbard coil , the same for Kapanadze device , the same for Don Smith one of devices, the same for Hendershot and many others. You are mislead thinking that Tesla didn't perfected the output conversion stage - he did it but never said plainly about it. His magnifying transmitter patent proves this.From here , extra coil become antenna but he was not sending EM waves but pure conduction current. Yet your comparison still apply - one transmitter many receivers.

[winsonali]

Forest:

thanks for explanation its very good this is why we say knowledge comes by discussion i was not knowing these things and devices of don smith or steven mark.....some times you stuck in some issues and going through the experiences of others you get good ideas

my method is totally different i am just writing firm ware for the final procedures
Tesla is my mentor.

[gravityblock]

I see that this thread is leading nowhere. Ali, how can you talk about magnetic charges? No one has ever seen magnetic monopole and according to classic electrodynamical theory they dont exist. If you discovered magnetic monopole then you deserve Nobel prize.

Magnetic monopoles detected in a real magnet for the first time, http://www.physorg.com/news171209923.html  Also, according to the article they interact in the same way as electric charges.

There are several theories that predict the existence of monopoles.  You must be holding to the classic electrodynamical theory of being correct and the other theories are wrong.  How closed minded is this?  LOL

In this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-dbGUcnFaI&feature=channel , you can see the magnetic monopoles when the lines of flux are disconnected from each other.

When the field lines are connected to each other then there is a return path which creates a dipole because it's connecting two poles.  When they're not connected, then there is no return path for the flux, which is a monopole because it's only connected to a single pole.  Without monopoles, you can't have a dipole.  Monopoles carry the magnetic fields which creates a dipole.  In the video you can see how the monopoles carry the magnetic fields.  These monopoles are the "virtual photons" that physicists theorize about.

Read the article and study the video, then you will realize the article and video fit perfectly together.

GB

[winsonali]

gravityblock:
nice video and very informative article

in my experience when you move magnet over a coil its the speed of your movement that determine the voltage and current induced
in the coil Higher speed doesn't effect in any way the magnetic filed (nor it increase nor it decreases).
to get mechanical accuracy above 10,000RPM (150HZ) is pretty scary for a machine in continuous operation
the success is in solid state power generation

for this purpose EE must be released from its active zone to passive zone where it can move freely and then recaptured in active zones on multiple channels this will give us extra power generation then input

a very interesting behavior in SMPS we increase the switching frequency from 10 Khz  to 300 Khz we get very good current rating and good supply but its not overunity coz it remains in active zone when we increase load on output secondary coil of transformer induce higher FLUX then primary coil at this moment primary coil start consuming more current to balance the power level this is an active zone
now if we lit a bulb of 100 watts the power remains same no matter how many things receive the light this is a passive zone
when a radio starts transmission at 5 watt its power doesn't change no matter how many receiver starts receiving the signal.

   

 


   

[gravityblock]

@ali:

I'm impressed how you don't let baseless or uninformed statements such as jan.kolar to re-direct your thoughts on what your observing in your experiments.  Keep up the good work.

GB