New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[aaron5120]

arron:

the attached picture will help you you don't need 2 magnets the arrangement you provide sheilding and central magnet..

more power full magnets means more current......

Hi Winsonali,
Often the most elegant solution ends up being the most simple one. I must conceed that your solution is brilliant, and yet very simple!
Thank you very much , Winsonali, and my hat's off to your good self.
I will proceed to order the magnets and to make the iron shields now.
Best Regards,
Aaron5120

[neha9243]

 winsonali

I am fully agree with you.  keep the good work .

neha9243

[neha9243]

 aaron 5120

all the best and keep the good work

neha9243

[aaron5120]

aaron

here is more information and why this setup is better then conventional methods also i have mentioned how to wind the coil in this way it will reduce magnetic resistance and give you smooth output

also i have mention the MOSFET on / off times for load collection

Hi Winsonali,
Regarding the magnet pole setup I came up with a question and would like to have you clarification:
According to your magnet pole setup as per first attachment, the poles are alternating, that is N-S-N-S-N- etc, in order to regauge the coil and produce AC current in the pick up coils. The waveform you show in the picture confirmed that.
But according to the photos taken, the disks contains 5 disk magnets(see attachment 2), so they will be: N-S-N-S-N. But then the last one will repeat as N-N after going one round of 360 degrees.
Should not be it necessary to have minimum 6 disk magnets in each wooden disks instead of 5 magnets?
Please clarify this point, as it is very important for the replication, thanks!
aaron5120

[allcanadian]

@EMdevices
Quote
"I see some of you talk about breaking Lenz's Law and I think most people have the wrong impression about what it is. All lenz's law states is that the polarity of the voltage induced by the changing magnetic field is OPPOSING the applied voltage, it is simply analogous to the inertial force that always acts against the applied force.  Without inertia you would not build up momentum or energy, same with electricity.  If you don't have this effect it means you're not building up a magnetic field, which contains energy.  Some people build bifilar coils and claim they have broken Lenz's law, when in reality they have a poor coil with less inductance. I'm telling you guys, if you want free energy,   look for free SOURCES OF ENERGY, instead of wasting precious time on stupid notions like "breaking lenz's law"

I do not think it is a waste of time as any time we examine something or seek knowledge about it we learn something new and when we learn enough we gain an intimate understanding of what in fact it really is, this is called evolution. As well your statements would seem to hold to the conventional view when it should be obvious that few if any who have accomplished extraordinary things hold this view, we could say they were very unconventional in their thinking. As far as "stupid notions like breaking lenz law" is concerned, it is in fact a very easy thing to do when you understand "what" it really is. Consider your statement---"All lenz's law states is that the polarity of the voltage induced by the changing magnetic field is OPPOSING the applied voltage"---, when a magnet approaches a coil there is no applied voltage only induced voltage, when a changing(motional) permanent magnetic field induces a voltage in a coil there is no opposition until a current flows and produces a magnetic field in opposition to the motional one. It should be obvious that the induced voltage has little to do with Lenz Law until this induced voltage is allowed to flow as an electric current producing an opposing magnetic field. I wonder what might happen if instead of inducing a current in the coil we could store the induced voltage as an electric field to which Lenz law does not apply?. In fact this is what many inventors have done, they store energy as an electric or capacitive field and release this stored energy out of phase with the passing magnet on a rotor. As you can see this is not a conventional way of doing things and this is why it works, Lenz Law is not a "LAW" it is a theory upheld by repetition --- of doing the same things over and over. The world is not flat and it does not revolve around you, machines heavier than air can fly and this silly notion of breaking Lenz Law is in fact quite easy to understand but it depends on two things--- knowledge and perspective.
Regards
AC